氟喹诺酮类药物和噩梦的风险:利用美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统数据库中的个案安全报告进行文献综述和不成比例分析。

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-27 DOI:10.1177/02698811251344684
Mohammad Ali Omrani, Christian T Tsobo, Niaz Chalabianloo, Fatemeh Ahmadi, Sheikh S Abdullah, Flory T Muanda
{"title":"氟喹诺酮类药物和噩梦的风险:利用美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统数据库中的个案安全报告进行文献综述和不成比例分析。","authors":"Mohammad Ali Omrani, Christian T Tsobo, Niaz Chalabianloo, Fatemeh Ahmadi, Sheikh S Abdullah, Flory T Muanda","doi":"10.1177/02698811251344684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluoroquinolones (FQs) have been linked to various neuropsychiatric effects, including nightmares, mostly through case reports. However, data on nightmares remain limited and underreported.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To review the literature on FQ-related nightmares and estimate the risk of nightmares associated with FQs compared to other antibiotics using data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted to identify studies on FQ-related nightmares. Active-comparator restricted disproportionality analyses were performed in FAERS (2004Q1-2023Q4) for ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin compared to azithromycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. We calculated reporting odds ratios (RORs), proportional reporting ratios, adjusted ROR (accounting age, sex, weight, and specific indications), and information components (IC<sub>025</sub>) to detect safety signals for the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities term \"nightmare.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review identified seven studies, with the prevalence of nightmares ranging from 0.01% to 8% across three trials. Disproportionality analyses indicated that FQ-associated nightmare reports were 6- to 10-fold higher than those linked to azithromycin (ROR: 6.18, 95% CI: 4.14-9.23) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (ROR: 10.38, 95% CI: 4.92-21.89), largely reported by consumers. These findings were consistent across frequentist and Bayesian methods and adjusted analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FQs may increase the risk of nightmares. Our findings provide valuable insights for future research on their safety profile. Further research is needed to validate these findings and guide safe FQ use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"782-789"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12287549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluoroquinolones and risk of nightmares: A literature review and disproportionality analysis using individual case safety reports from Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Ali Omrani, Christian T Tsobo, Niaz Chalabianloo, Fatemeh Ahmadi, Sheikh S Abdullah, Flory T Muanda\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02698811251344684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluoroquinolones (FQs) have been linked to various neuropsychiatric effects, including nightmares, mostly through case reports. However, data on nightmares remain limited and underreported.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To review the literature on FQ-related nightmares and estimate the risk of nightmares associated with FQs compared to other antibiotics using data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted to identify studies on FQ-related nightmares. Active-comparator restricted disproportionality analyses were performed in FAERS (2004Q1-2023Q4) for ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin compared to azithromycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. We calculated reporting odds ratios (RORs), proportional reporting ratios, adjusted ROR (accounting age, sex, weight, and specific indications), and information components (IC<sub>025</sub>) to detect safety signals for the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities term \\\"nightmare.\\\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review identified seven studies, with the prevalence of nightmares ranging from 0.01% to 8% across three trials. Disproportionality analyses indicated that FQ-associated nightmare reports were 6- to 10-fold higher than those linked to azithromycin (ROR: 6.18, 95% CI: 4.14-9.23) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (ROR: 10.38, 95% CI: 4.92-21.89), largely reported by consumers. These findings were consistent across frequentist and Bayesian methods and adjusted analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FQs may increase the risk of nightmares. Our findings provide valuable insights for future research on their safety profile. Further research is needed to validate these findings and guide safe FQ use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"782-789\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12287549/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811251344684\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811251344684","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:氟喹诺酮类药物(FQs)与各种神经精神影响有关,包括噩梦,主要是通过病例报告。然而,关于噩梦的数据仍然有限且报道不足。目的:回顾有关FQs相关噩梦的文献,并利用美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中的数据,与其他抗生素相比,估计FQs相关噩梦的风险。方法:对有关fq相关噩梦的研究进行文献回顾。在FAERS (2004Q1-2023Q4)中对环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星与阿奇霉素和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑进行了活性比较器限制性歧化分析。我们计算报告优势比(RORs)、比例报告比、调整ROR(考虑年龄、性别、体重和特定适应症)和信息成分(IC025),以检测监管活动医学词典术语“噩梦”的安全信号。结果:该综述确定了七项研究,在三项试验中,噩梦的患病率从0.01%到8%不等。不成比例分析表明,与fq相关的噩梦报告比与阿奇霉素(ROR: 6.18, 95% CI: 4.14-9.23)和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(ROR: 10.38, 95% CI: 4.92-21.89)相关的报告高6- 10倍,主要由消费者报告。这些发现在频率分析和贝叶斯方法以及调整后的分析中是一致的。结论:FQs可能会增加做噩梦的风险。我们的发现为未来对其安全性的研究提供了有价值的见解。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现并指导安全使用FQ。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fluoroquinolones and risk of nightmares: A literature review and disproportionality analysis using individual case safety reports from Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database.

Fluoroquinolones and risk of nightmares: A literature review and disproportionality analysis using individual case safety reports from Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database.

Fluoroquinolones and risk of nightmares: A literature review and disproportionality analysis using individual case safety reports from Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database.

Fluoroquinolones and risk of nightmares: A literature review and disproportionality analysis using individual case safety reports from Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database.

Background: Fluoroquinolones (FQs) have been linked to various neuropsychiatric effects, including nightmares, mostly through case reports. However, data on nightmares remain limited and underreported.

Aims: To review the literature on FQ-related nightmares and estimate the risk of nightmares associated with FQs compared to other antibiotics using data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Methods: A literature review was conducted to identify studies on FQ-related nightmares. Active-comparator restricted disproportionality analyses were performed in FAERS (2004Q1-2023Q4) for ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin compared to azithromycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. We calculated reporting odds ratios (RORs), proportional reporting ratios, adjusted ROR (accounting age, sex, weight, and specific indications), and information components (IC025) to detect safety signals for the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities term "nightmare."

Results: The review identified seven studies, with the prevalence of nightmares ranging from 0.01% to 8% across three trials. Disproportionality analyses indicated that FQ-associated nightmare reports were 6- to 10-fold higher than those linked to azithromycin (ROR: 6.18, 95% CI: 4.14-9.23) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (ROR: 10.38, 95% CI: 4.92-21.89), largely reported by consumers. These findings were consistent across frequentist and Bayesian methods and adjusted analyses.

Conclusion: FQs may increase the risk of nightmares. Our findings provide valuable insights for future research on their safety profile. Further research is needed to validate these findings and guide safe FQ use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信