Lilian Kuhnert Campos, Nébia Maria Almeida de Figueiredo
{"title":"低社会经济地位妇女的感受、实践和母乳喂养话语。","authors":"Lilian Kuhnert Campos, Nébia Maria Almeida de Figueiredo","doi":"10.1177/08903344251344906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breastfeeding, widely recognized for its significant health benefits, presents multifaceted challenges that contribute to low breastfeeding rates in many countries worldwide. In postmodern society, women's decisions regarding breastfeeding are influenced by numerous factors, including socioeconomic status, work-related demands, social norms, digital media, and individual subjectivities.</p><p><strong>Research aim: </strong>This study aims to identify and analyze the subjective factors that shape women's perceptions of breastfeeding in low-income settings, including the impact of breastfeeding discourse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research employed a qualitative approach, utilizing Cartography for data collection and Laurence Bardin's Content Analysis for interpretation. Nineteen postpartum women from a public hospital participated in the study, sharing their emotions, perceptions, and objective factors influencing their breastfeeding decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A complex interplay of positive and negative sentiments was observed. Bonding, defined as a feeling of connection to the baby, emerged as the most prominent positive emotion. On the other hand, fear and insecurity-primarily related to concerns about pain and insufficient milk supply-were identified as the dominant negative emotions. Additionally, participants expressed embarrassment about breastfeeding in public and emphasized the crucial role of information and support provided by healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the subjective factors influencing breastfeeding choices among underprivileged women is essential for providing effective information and support. Reframing the breastfeeding discourse to reinforce women's confidence in their abilities, and emphasizing the societal responsibility for support, can help ensure a positive experience for all women and contribute to higher breastfeeding rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":15948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Lactation","volume":" ","pages":"434-444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feelings, Practices, and the Breastfeeding Discourse Among Women of Low Socioeconomic Status.\",\"authors\":\"Lilian Kuhnert Campos, Nébia Maria Almeida de Figueiredo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08903344251344906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breastfeeding, widely recognized for its significant health benefits, presents multifaceted challenges that contribute to low breastfeeding rates in many countries worldwide. In postmodern society, women's decisions regarding breastfeeding are influenced by numerous factors, including socioeconomic status, work-related demands, social norms, digital media, and individual subjectivities.</p><p><strong>Research aim: </strong>This study aims to identify and analyze the subjective factors that shape women's perceptions of breastfeeding in low-income settings, including the impact of breastfeeding discourse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research employed a qualitative approach, utilizing Cartography for data collection and Laurence Bardin's Content Analysis for interpretation. Nineteen postpartum women from a public hospital participated in the study, sharing their emotions, perceptions, and objective factors influencing their breastfeeding decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A complex interplay of positive and negative sentiments was observed. Bonding, defined as a feeling of connection to the baby, emerged as the most prominent positive emotion. On the other hand, fear and insecurity-primarily related to concerns about pain and insufficient milk supply-were identified as the dominant negative emotions. Additionally, participants expressed embarrassment about breastfeeding in public and emphasized the crucial role of information and support provided by healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the subjective factors influencing breastfeeding choices among underprivileged women is essential for providing effective information and support. Reframing the breastfeeding discourse to reinforce women's confidence in their abilities, and emphasizing the societal responsibility for support, can help ensure a positive experience for all women and contribute to higher breastfeeding rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Lactation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"434-444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Lactation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344251344906\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Lactation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344251344906","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Feelings, Practices, and the Breastfeeding Discourse Among Women of Low Socioeconomic Status.
Background: Breastfeeding, widely recognized for its significant health benefits, presents multifaceted challenges that contribute to low breastfeeding rates in many countries worldwide. In postmodern society, women's decisions regarding breastfeeding are influenced by numerous factors, including socioeconomic status, work-related demands, social norms, digital media, and individual subjectivities.
Research aim: This study aims to identify and analyze the subjective factors that shape women's perceptions of breastfeeding in low-income settings, including the impact of breastfeeding discourse.
Methods: The research employed a qualitative approach, utilizing Cartography for data collection and Laurence Bardin's Content Analysis for interpretation. Nineteen postpartum women from a public hospital participated in the study, sharing their emotions, perceptions, and objective factors influencing their breastfeeding decisions.
Results: A complex interplay of positive and negative sentiments was observed. Bonding, defined as a feeling of connection to the baby, emerged as the most prominent positive emotion. On the other hand, fear and insecurity-primarily related to concerns about pain and insufficient milk supply-were identified as the dominant negative emotions. Additionally, participants expressed embarrassment about breastfeeding in public and emphasized the crucial role of information and support provided by healthcare professionals.
Conclusion: Understanding the subjective factors influencing breastfeeding choices among underprivileged women is essential for providing effective information and support. Reframing the breastfeeding discourse to reinforce women's confidence in their abilities, and emphasizing the societal responsibility for support, can help ensure a positive experience for all women and contribute to higher breastfeeding rates.
期刊介绍:
Committed to the promotion of diversity and equity in all our policies and practices, our aims are:
To provide our readers and the international communities of clinicians, educators and scholars working in the field of lactation with current and quality-based evidence, from a broad array of disciplines, including the medical sciences, basic sciences, social sciences and the humanities.
To provide student and novice researchers, as well as, researchers whose native language is not English, with expert editorial guidance while preparing their work for publication in JHL.
In each issue, the Journal of Human Lactation publishes original research, original theoretical and conceptual articles, discussions of policy and practice issues, and the following special features:
Advocacy: A column that discusses a ‘hot’ topic in lactation advocacy
About Research: A column focused on an in-depth discussion of a different research topic each issue
Lactation Newsmakers: An interview with a widely-recognized outstanding expert in the field from around the globe
Research Commentary: A brief discussion of the issues raised in a specific research article published in the current issue
Book review(s): Reviews written by content experts about relevant new publications
International News Briefs: From major international lactation organizations.