Robyn Marijn Schipper, Loandi Richter-Mouton, Lise Korsten
{"title":"水-土壤-植物-食物关系中隐孢子虫的优化分子检测:推进农业系统监测。","authors":"Robyn Marijn Schipper, Loandi Richter-Mouton, Lise Korsten","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Cryptosporidium</em>, a protozoan parasite causing severe diarrheal illness in humans and animals, poses detection challenges due to low parasite concentrations, inhibitors, and inefficient DNA extraction. This study optimized DNA extraction and detection of Cryptosporidium in environmental samples and evaluated their practical use in agriculture. After evaluating 11 DNA extraction methods from spiked phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) samples, three methods for molecular detection of <em>Cryptosporidium</em> in water, soil, and fresh produce were selected and further tested using real-time PCR. A total of 188 artificially contaminated samples were prepared, consisting of distilled water (<em>n</em> = 36), environmental water (<em>n</em> = 44), soil (<em>n</em> = 36), and fresh produce (lettuce and spinach; <em>n</em> = 72). Each sample was inoculated with serial dilutions of 12,500 to 5 <em>Cryptosporidium</em> oocysts and tested using real-time PCR and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to evaluate detection sensitivity. Results demonstrated that extraction performance varied by matrix, with two spin-column kits excelling for water and another for soil and produce. DNA from as few as five oocysts was occasionally detectable, with ddPCR being less prone to be affected by PCR inhibitors than real-time PCR. These methods were then applied to detect Cryptosporidium in 210 environmental samples (water, soil, produce) from South African small-scale farms. None of the samples tested positive with real-time PCR, while ddPCR detected <em>Cryptosporidium</em> in 13.6% of water, 23.3% of soil, and 34.7% of fresh produce samples. Surface water showed the highest contamination at 28.6%. Soil amended with both fertilizer and manure had a 45% contamination rate. Among vegetables, roots were most affected (46.7%), followed by fruiting (40%) and leafy greens (30.15%). These findings highlight the health risks of Cryptosporidium in food systems and the need for improved detection methods to enhance surveillance and inform future outbreak prevention strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 9","pages":"Article 100568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimized Molecular Detection of Cryptosporidium Within the Water-Soil-Plant-Food Nexus: Advancing Surveillance in Agricultural Systems\",\"authors\":\"Robyn Marijn Schipper, Loandi Richter-Mouton, Lise Korsten\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><em>Cryptosporidium</em>, a protozoan parasite causing severe diarrheal illness in humans and animals, poses detection challenges due to low parasite concentrations, inhibitors, and inefficient DNA extraction. This study optimized DNA extraction and detection of Cryptosporidium in environmental samples and evaluated their practical use in agriculture. After evaluating 11 DNA extraction methods from spiked phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) samples, three methods for molecular detection of <em>Cryptosporidium</em> in water, soil, and fresh produce were selected and further tested using real-time PCR. A total of 188 artificially contaminated samples were prepared, consisting of distilled water (<em>n</em> = 36), environmental water (<em>n</em> = 44), soil (<em>n</em> = 36), and fresh produce (lettuce and spinach; <em>n</em> = 72). Each sample was inoculated with serial dilutions of 12,500 to 5 <em>Cryptosporidium</em> oocysts and tested using real-time PCR and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to evaluate detection sensitivity. Results demonstrated that extraction performance varied by matrix, with two spin-column kits excelling for water and another for soil and produce. DNA from as few as five oocysts was occasionally detectable, with ddPCR being less prone to be affected by PCR inhibitors than real-time PCR. These methods were then applied to detect Cryptosporidium in 210 environmental samples (water, soil, produce) from South African small-scale farms. None of the samples tested positive with real-time PCR, while ddPCR detected <em>Cryptosporidium</em> in 13.6% of water, 23.3% of soil, and 34.7% of fresh produce samples. Surface water showed the highest contamination at 28.6%. Soil amended with both fertilizer and manure had a 45% contamination rate. Among vegetables, roots were most affected (46.7%), followed by fruiting (40%) and leafy greens (30.15%). These findings highlight the health risks of Cryptosporidium in food systems and the need for improved detection methods to enhance surveillance and inform future outbreak prevention strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"88 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 100568\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001206\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimized Molecular Detection of Cryptosporidium Within the Water-Soil-Plant-Food Nexus: Advancing Surveillance in Agricultural Systems
Cryptosporidium, a protozoan parasite causing severe diarrheal illness in humans and animals, poses detection challenges due to low parasite concentrations, inhibitors, and inefficient DNA extraction. This study optimized DNA extraction and detection of Cryptosporidium in environmental samples and evaluated their practical use in agriculture. After evaluating 11 DNA extraction methods from spiked phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) samples, three methods for molecular detection of Cryptosporidium in water, soil, and fresh produce were selected and further tested using real-time PCR. A total of 188 artificially contaminated samples were prepared, consisting of distilled water (n = 36), environmental water (n = 44), soil (n = 36), and fresh produce (lettuce and spinach; n = 72). Each sample was inoculated with serial dilutions of 12,500 to 5 Cryptosporidium oocysts and tested using real-time PCR and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to evaluate detection sensitivity. Results demonstrated that extraction performance varied by matrix, with two spin-column kits excelling for water and another for soil and produce. DNA from as few as five oocysts was occasionally detectable, with ddPCR being less prone to be affected by PCR inhibitors than real-time PCR. These methods were then applied to detect Cryptosporidium in 210 environmental samples (water, soil, produce) from South African small-scale farms. None of the samples tested positive with real-time PCR, while ddPCR detected Cryptosporidium in 13.6% of water, 23.3% of soil, and 34.7% of fresh produce samples. Surface water showed the highest contamination at 28.6%. Soil amended with both fertilizer and manure had a 45% contamination rate. Among vegetables, roots were most affected (46.7%), followed by fruiting (40%) and leafy greens (30.15%). These findings highlight the health risks of Cryptosporidium in food systems and the need for improved detection methods to enhance surveillance and inform future outbreak prevention strategies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.