以案例为基础的综合自主学习形式促进MBBS二年级学生主动学习的有效性。

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_683_24
Suvarna Sande, Manisha M Rajguru
{"title":"以案例为基础的综合自主学习形式促进MBBS二年级学生主动学习的有效性。","authors":"Suvarna Sande, Manisha M Rajguru","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_683_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-directed learning (SDL), which is related to the management of lifelong learning for better outcomes, is one of the most effective teaching techniques for adult learners. This study aims to see effectiveness of integrated SDL in the form of case-based learning (CBL) to promote active learning among second-year MBBS students, assess the learning gain, and find student's perception regarding integrated SDL in the form of CBL.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on second-year MBBS students in Nagpur. Block teaching (integrated topics of Microbiology, Pathology, and Pharmacology) of different topics, followed by SDL-CBL session, was conducted. Modules for integrated SDL were prepared. Pretest and posttest using MCQs as an assessment tool and students' feedback about SDL-CBL sessions were collected. Learning outcome was assessed by quantitative methods like comparison of pre- and posttest scores and learning gain was calculated by appropriate formulas.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Analysis of pretest and posttest scores was done which showed an increase in score after posttest for each session. ALG, RLG, and class average normalized gain were calculated. Learning outcome by assessment of learning gain showed significant observations. More than 90% of students had given a Likert's scale scoring of 5 (strongly agree) on about integrated SDL feedback.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Block teaching, followed by integrated SDL-CBL modality, was found to be effective for in-depth and meaningful understanding of the topic. It fosters peer engagement, produces higher application-based knowledge, and makes learning more interesting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"14 ","pages":"208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12200200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of integrated self-directed learning in the form of case-based learning to promote active learning among second-year MBBS students.\",\"authors\":\"Suvarna Sande, Manisha M Rajguru\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jehp.jehp_683_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-directed learning (SDL), which is related to the management of lifelong learning for better outcomes, is one of the most effective teaching techniques for adult learners. This study aims to see effectiveness of integrated SDL in the form of case-based learning (CBL) to promote active learning among second-year MBBS students, assess the learning gain, and find student's perception regarding integrated SDL in the form of CBL.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on second-year MBBS students in Nagpur. Block teaching (integrated topics of Microbiology, Pathology, and Pharmacology) of different topics, followed by SDL-CBL session, was conducted. Modules for integrated SDL were prepared. Pretest and posttest using MCQs as an assessment tool and students' feedback about SDL-CBL sessions were collected. Learning outcome was assessed by quantitative methods like comparison of pre- and posttest scores and learning gain was calculated by appropriate formulas.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Analysis of pretest and posttest scores was done which showed an increase in score after posttest for each session. ALG, RLG, and class average normalized gain were calculated. Learning outcome by assessment of learning gain showed significant observations. More than 90% of students had given a Likert's scale scoring of 5 (strongly agree) on about integrated SDL feedback.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Block teaching, followed by integrated SDL-CBL modality, was found to be effective for in-depth and meaningful understanding of the topic. It fosters peer engagement, produces higher application-based knowledge, and makes learning more interesting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12200200/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_683_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_683_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自主学习(Self-directed learning, SDL)是成人学习者最有效的教学方法之一,涉及终身学习的管理,以获得更好的学习效果。本研究旨在观察以案例为基础的整合SDL在促进MBBS二年级学生主动学习方面的有效性,评估学习收益,并发现学生对以案例为基础的整合SDL的认知。材料与方法:对那格浦尔MBBS二年级学生进行横断面研究。采用不同主题的分组教学(微生物学、病理学和药理学的综合主题),然后进行SDL-CBL教学。编制了集成SDL模块。采用mcq作为评估工具进行前测和后测,收集学生对SDL-CBL会话的反馈。学习效果通过前后测试分数比较等定量方法评估,学习收益通过适当的公式计算。结果:对前测和后测成绩进行了分析,结果显示,每一次后测后测的成绩都有所提高。计算ALG、RLG和类平均归一化增益。学习成果通过学习收获的评估显示出显著的观察结果。超过90%的学生在综合SDL反馈的李克特量表得分为5分(非常同意)。结论:块式教学,再辅以SDL-CBL的综合教学模式,对深入、有意义地理解主题是有效的。它促进同伴参与,产生更高的基于应用的知识,并使学习更有趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of integrated self-directed learning in the form of case-based learning to promote active learning among second-year MBBS students.

Background: Self-directed learning (SDL), which is related to the management of lifelong learning for better outcomes, is one of the most effective teaching techniques for adult learners. This study aims to see effectiveness of integrated SDL in the form of case-based learning (CBL) to promote active learning among second-year MBBS students, assess the learning gain, and find student's perception regarding integrated SDL in the form of CBL.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on second-year MBBS students in Nagpur. Block teaching (integrated topics of Microbiology, Pathology, and Pharmacology) of different topics, followed by SDL-CBL session, was conducted. Modules for integrated SDL were prepared. Pretest and posttest using MCQs as an assessment tool and students' feedback about SDL-CBL sessions were collected. Learning outcome was assessed by quantitative methods like comparison of pre- and posttest scores and learning gain was calculated by appropriate formulas.

Result: Analysis of pretest and posttest scores was done which showed an increase in score after posttest for each session. ALG, RLG, and class average normalized gain were calculated. Learning outcome by assessment of learning gain showed significant observations. More than 90% of students had given a Likert's scale scoring of 5 (strongly agree) on about integrated SDL feedback.

Conclusion: Block teaching, followed by integrated SDL-CBL modality, was found to be effective for in-depth and meaningful understanding of the topic. It fosters peer engagement, produces higher application-based knowledge, and makes learning more interesting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信