一种新的评估牙槽裂移植后骨矿物质密度的三维方法:自体骨移植与人工骨移植的比较。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Siqi Wei, Zhilu Zhang, Yongqian Wang
{"title":"一种新的评估牙槽裂移植后骨矿物质密度的三维方法:自体骨移植与人工骨移植的比较。","authors":"Siqi Wei, Zhilu Zhang, Yongqian Wang","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alveolar bone grafting (ABG) is crucial for treating alveolar clefts in cleft lip and palate patients. While bone mineral density (BMD) is a key indicator of bone quality, traditional 2D measurement methods lack accuracy. This study introduces a novel 3D BMD assessment technique to compare autografts and synthetic grafts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis included 54 patients (36 autografts, 18 synthetic grafts) aged 8 to 12 years with unilateral alveolar clefts. Preoperative and postoperative CT scans (6 m) were processed using MIMICS software for 3D reconstruction. Newly formed bone regions were segmented, and mean HU were calculated. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were assessed through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and BMD differences were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The synthetic graft group exhibited significantly higher median BMD (636.38 HU) compared with autografts (483.88 HU, P<0.0001). The 3D method demonstrated excellent reliability, with ICCs >0.9 for both intraobserver and interobserver consistency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel 3D BMD measurement method provides a reliable and comprehensive assessment of bone quality post-ABG. Synthetic grafts resulted in higher BMD, potentially offering superior bone regeneration outcomes in clinical practice. This technique enhances clinical evaluation and graft material selection for alveolar cleft repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel 3D Approach for Assessing Bone Mineral Density After Alveolar Cleft Grafting: Comparison of Autografts and Synthetic Grafts.\",\"authors\":\"Siqi Wei, Zhilu Zhang, Yongqian Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alveolar bone grafting (ABG) is crucial for treating alveolar clefts in cleft lip and palate patients. While bone mineral density (BMD) is a key indicator of bone quality, traditional 2D measurement methods lack accuracy. This study introduces a novel 3D BMD assessment technique to compare autografts and synthetic grafts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis included 54 patients (36 autografts, 18 synthetic grafts) aged 8 to 12 years with unilateral alveolar clefts. Preoperative and postoperative CT scans (6 m) were processed using MIMICS software for 3D reconstruction. Newly formed bone regions were segmented, and mean HU were calculated. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were assessed through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and BMD differences were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The synthetic graft group exhibited significantly higher median BMD (636.38 HU) compared with autografts (483.88 HU, P<0.0001). The 3D method demonstrated excellent reliability, with ICCs >0.9 for both intraobserver and interobserver consistency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel 3D BMD measurement method provides a reliable and comprehensive assessment of bone quality post-ABG. Synthetic grafts resulted in higher BMD, potentially offering superior bone regeneration outcomes in clinical practice. This technique enhances clinical evaluation and graft material selection for alveolar cleft repair.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011613\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011613","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要牙槽骨移植是治疗唇腭裂患者牙槽骨裂的重要手段。骨矿物质密度(BMD)是骨质量的关键指标,传统的二维测量方法缺乏准确性。本研究介绍了一种新的3D骨密度评估技术来比较自体移植物和合成移植物。方法:回顾性分析54例8 ~ 12岁单侧牙槽裂患者(36例自体骨移植,18例人工骨移植)。术前和术后CT扫描(6 m)使用MIMICS软件进行三维重建。对新形成的骨区进行分割,计算平均HU。通过类内相关系数(ICC)评估观察者内部和观察者之间的信度,并使用Mann-Whitney U检验分析BMD差异。结果:合成移植物组的中位骨密度(636.38 HU)明显高于自体移植物组(483.88 HU),观察者内和观察者间一致性P0.9。结论:新型三维骨密度测量方法提供了一种可靠、全面的骨质量评估方法。合成移植物导致更高的骨密度,在临床实践中可能提供更好的骨再生结果。该技术提高了牙槽裂修复的临床评价和移植物材料的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Novel 3D Approach for Assessing Bone Mineral Density After Alveolar Cleft Grafting: Comparison of Autografts and Synthetic Grafts.

Introduction: Alveolar bone grafting (ABG) is crucial for treating alveolar clefts in cleft lip and palate patients. While bone mineral density (BMD) is a key indicator of bone quality, traditional 2D measurement methods lack accuracy. This study introduces a novel 3D BMD assessment technique to compare autografts and synthetic grafts.

Methods: A retrospective analysis included 54 patients (36 autografts, 18 synthetic grafts) aged 8 to 12 years with unilateral alveolar clefts. Preoperative and postoperative CT scans (6 m) were processed using MIMICS software for 3D reconstruction. Newly formed bone regions were segmented, and mean HU were calculated. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were assessed through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and BMD differences were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: The synthetic graft group exhibited significantly higher median BMD (636.38 HU) compared with autografts (483.88 HU, P<0.0001). The 3D method demonstrated excellent reliability, with ICCs >0.9 for both intraobserver and interobserver consistency.

Conclusions: The novel 3D BMD measurement method provides a reliable and comprehensive assessment of bone quality post-ABG. Synthetic grafts resulted in higher BMD, potentially offering superior bone regeneration outcomes in clinical practice. This technique enhances clinical evaluation and graft material selection for alveolar cleft repair.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信