成人ADHD临床评估的症状效度与表现效度:网络分析的启示?

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Anselm B M Fuermaier, Oliver Hirsch, Björn Albrecht, Mira-Lynn Chavanon, Hanna Christiansen
{"title":"成人ADHD临床评估的症状效度与表现效度:网络分析的启示?","authors":"Anselm B M Fuermaier, Oliver Hirsch, Björn Albrecht, Mira-Lynn Chavanon, Hanna Christiansen","doi":"10.1177/10870547251348779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>First-time diagnoses of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults can be challenging due to diverse methodologies available for assessment, and the choices clinicians need to make about how to interpret diagnostic criteria. Network analysis is a statistical approach that has received growing attention in clinical research of recent years. It has the potential to aid visualization and illustrate the intricate relationships between the wide range of clinical measures.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The goal of the present study is to examine the value of network analysis on a sample of <i>N</i> = 896 adults newly diagnosed with ADHD in an outpatient referral context.</p><p><strong>Method and results: </strong>The network depicts the interrelationship of a comprehensive set of measures and test variables, including symptom self- and other-reports, cognitive tests, motor activity, as well as measures of symptom and performance validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our network analysis supports ADHD symptom clusters with distinct networks of motor activity and attention/impulsivity and reflects the mode of assessment, i.e., neuropsychological versus self- and observer-ratings. The network further depicts the dissociable role of symptom and performance validity measures, and the different nature of embedded and freestanding validity tests. We discuss the future application of network analysis in clinical research on ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"10870547251348779"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Symptom and Performance Validity Measures in the Clinical Assessment of Adult ADHD: What Do We Learn from Network Analysis?\",\"authors\":\"Anselm B M Fuermaier, Oliver Hirsch, Björn Albrecht, Mira-Lynn Chavanon, Hanna Christiansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10870547251348779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>First-time diagnoses of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults can be challenging due to diverse methodologies available for assessment, and the choices clinicians need to make about how to interpret diagnostic criteria. Network analysis is a statistical approach that has received growing attention in clinical research of recent years. It has the potential to aid visualization and illustrate the intricate relationships between the wide range of clinical measures.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The goal of the present study is to examine the value of network analysis on a sample of <i>N</i> = 896 adults newly diagnosed with ADHD in an outpatient referral context.</p><p><strong>Method and results: </strong>The network depicts the interrelationship of a comprehensive set of measures and test variables, including symptom self- and other-reports, cognitive tests, motor activity, as well as measures of symptom and performance validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our network analysis supports ADHD symptom clusters with distinct networks of motor activity and attention/impulsivity and reflects the mode of assessment, i.e., neuropsychological versus self- and observer-ratings. The network further depicts the dissociable role of symptom and performance validity measures, and the different nature of embedded and freestanding validity tests. We discuss the future application of network analysis in clinical research on ADHD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Attention Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10870547251348779\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Attention Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547251348779\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Attention Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547251348779","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:成人注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的首次诊断可能具有挑战性,因为可用于评估的方法多种多样,临床医生需要做出如何解释诊断标准的选择。网络分析是近年来在临床研究中越来越受到重视的一种统计方法。它有可能帮助可视化和说明各种临床措施之间复杂的关系。目的:本研究的目的是检验网络分析在N = 896例新诊断为ADHD的成人门诊转诊背景下的价值。方法和结果:该网络描述了一套全面的测量和测试变量之间的相互关系,包括症状自我和他人报告、认知测试、运动活动,以及症状和表现有效性的测量。结论:我们的网络分析支持ADHD症状群具有不同的运动活动和注意/冲动网络,并反映了评估模式,即神经心理学与自我和观察者评分。该网络进一步描述了症状效度测量和绩效效度测量的分离作用,以及嵌入效度测试和独立效度测试的不同性质。讨论了网络分析在ADHD临床研究中的应用前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Symptom and Performance Validity Measures in the Clinical Assessment of Adult ADHD: What Do We Learn from Network Analysis?

Background: First-time diagnoses of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults can be challenging due to diverse methodologies available for assessment, and the choices clinicians need to make about how to interpret diagnostic criteria. Network analysis is a statistical approach that has received growing attention in clinical research of recent years. It has the potential to aid visualization and illustrate the intricate relationships between the wide range of clinical measures.

Aim: The goal of the present study is to examine the value of network analysis on a sample of N = 896 adults newly diagnosed with ADHD in an outpatient referral context.

Method and results: The network depicts the interrelationship of a comprehensive set of measures and test variables, including symptom self- and other-reports, cognitive tests, motor activity, as well as measures of symptom and performance validity.

Conclusion: Our network analysis supports ADHD symptom clusters with distinct networks of motor activity and attention/impulsivity and reflects the mode of assessment, i.e., neuropsychological versus self- and observer-ratings. The network further depicts the dissociable role of symptom and performance validity measures, and the different nature of embedded and freestanding validity tests. We discuss the future application of network analysis in clinical research on ADHD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Attention Disorders (JAD) focuses on basic and applied science concerning attention and related functions in children, adolescents, and adults. JAD publishes articles on diagnosis, comorbidity, neuropsychological functioning, psychopharmacology, and psychosocial issues. The journal also addresses practice, policy, and theory, as well as review articles, commentaries, in-depth analyses, empirical research articles, and case presentations or program evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信