在高强度的非自愿性任务中,血流限制会加速招募。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Lyric Richardson, Alex Olmos, Tony Montgomery, Kylie Burleson, Pasquale Succi, Sean M Lubiak, Taylor K Dinyer-McNeely, Shane M Hammer, Haley C Bergstrom, Ethan C Hill, Michael A Trevino
{"title":"在高强度的非自愿性任务中,血流限制会加速招募。","authors":"Lyric Richardson, Alex Olmos, Tony Montgomery, Kylie Burleson, Pasquale Succi, Sean M Lubiak, Taylor K Dinyer-McNeely, Shane M Hammer, Haley C Bergstrom, Ethan C Hill, Michael A Trevino","doi":"10.1055/a-2644-5025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined blood flow restriction (BFR) usage and motor unit (MU) behavior of the biceps brachii during a single high-intensity contraction. Twelve resistance-trained males (25±5 y) completed maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of the elbow flexors, followed by a 70% MVC with BFR and without BFR (CON). Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals from the 70% MVCs were decomposed to extract MU: recruitment thresholds (RTs), action potential amplitudes (MUAP<sub>AMPS</sub>), and mean firing rates (MFRs). EMG amplitude (EMG<sub>RMS</sub>) at 70% MVC was normalized (N-EMG<sub>RMS</sub>) to MVC EMG<sub>RMS</sub>. Paired samples <i>t</i>-tests compared the <i>y</i>-intercepts and slopes of the MUAP<sub>AMP</sub> and MFR vs. RT relationships and N-EMG<sub>RMS</sub> between treatments. For the MUAP<sub>AMP</sub> vs. RT relationships, the <i>y</i>-intercepts were greater (<i>p</i>=0.016) for CON than BFR, whereas the slopes were greater (<i>p</i>=0.024) for BFR than CON. For the MFR vs. RT relationships, the <i>y</i>-intercepts were greater (<i>p</i>=0.039) for BFR than CON, whereas the slopes were more negative (<i>p</i>=0.023) for BFR than CON. N-EMG<sub>RMS</sub> was greater (<i>p</i>=0.038) for BFR than CON. BFR accelerated higher-threshold MU recruitment, increased lower-threshold MU firing rates, and increased N-EMG<sub>RMS</sub> during a single high-intensity muscle action. BFR may be beneficial for accelerating MU recruitment in populations/scenarios where near-maximal efforts are contraindicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":14439,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood Flow Restriction Accelerates Recruitment During a High-Intensity Non-Volitional Task.\",\"authors\":\"Lyric Richardson, Alex Olmos, Tony Montgomery, Kylie Burleson, Pasquale Succi, Sean M Lubiak, Taylor K Dinyer-McNeely, Shane M Hammer, Haley C Bergstrom, Ethan C Hill, Michael A Trevino\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2644-5025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined blood flow restriction (BFR) usage and motor unit (MU) behavior of the biceps brachii during a single high-intensity contraction. Twelve resistance-trained males (25±5 y) completed maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of the elbow flexors, followed by a 70% MVC with BFR and without BFR (CON). Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals from the 70% MVCs were decomposed to extract MU: recruitment thresholds (RTs), action potential amplitudes (MUAP<sub>AMPS</sub>), and mean firing rates (MFRs). EMG amplitude (EMG<sub>RMS</sub>) at 70% MVC was normalized (N-EMG<sub>RMS</sub>) to MVC EMG<sub>RMS</sub>. Paired samples <i>t</i>-tests compared the <i>y</i>-intercepts and slopes of the MUAP<sub>AMP</sub> and MFR vs. RT relationships and N-EMG<sub>RMS</sub> between treatments. For the MUAP<sub>AMP</sub> vs. RT relationships, the <i>y</i>-intercepts were greater (<i>p</i>=0.016) for CON than BFR, whereas the slopes were greater (<i>p</i>=0.024) for BFR than CON. For the MFR vs. RT relationships, the <i>y</i>-intercepts were greater (<i>p</i>=0.039) for BFR than CON, whereas the slopes were more negative (<i>p</i>=0.023) for BFR than CON. N-EMG<sub>RMS</sub> was greater (<i>p</i>=0.038) for BFR than CON. BFR accelerated higher-threshold MU recruitment, increased lower-threshold MU firing rates, and increased N-EMG<sub>RMS</sub> during a single high-intensity muscle action. BFR may be beneficial for accelerating MU recruitment in populations/scenarios where near-maximal efforts are contraindicated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of sports medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of sports medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2644-5025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2644-5025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究检测了单次高强度收缩时肱二头肌(BB)的血流量限制(BFR)使用和运动单位(MU)行为。12名接受阻力训练的男性(25±5岁)完成了肘关节屈肌的最大自主等距收缩(MVCs),随后进行了70%的有(BFR)和无BFR (CON)的MVC。对70% MVCs的表面肌电图(EMG)信号进行分解,提取MU:招募阈值(RTs)、动作电位振幅(MUAPAMPS)和平均放电率(MFRs)。将70% MVC时的EMGRMS归一化(N-EMGRMS)为MVC EMGRMS。配对样本t检验比较了治疗间MUAPAMP和MFR与RT关系的y截距和斜率,以及N-EMGRMS。对于MUAPAMP与RT的关系,CON的y截距大于BFR (p=0.016),而BFR的斜率大于CON (p=0.024)。对于MFR与RT的关系,BFR的y截距大于CON (p=0.039),而BFR的斜率大于CON (p=0.023)。N-EMGRMS对BFR的影响大于CON (p=0.038)。BFR加速了高阈值MU的募集,增加了低阈值MU的发射率。并在单次高强度肌肉运动中增加N-EMGRMS。在禁忌症的人群/情况下,BFR可能有利于加速MU的招募。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blood Flow Restriction Accelerates Recruitment During a High-Intensity Non-Volitional Task.

This study examined blood flow restriction (BFR) usage and motor unit (MU) behavior of the biceps brachii during a single high-intensity contraction. Twelve resistance-trained males (25±5 y) completed maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of the elbow flexors, followed by a 70% MVC with BFR and without BFR (CON). Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals from the 70% MVCs were decomposed to extract MU: recruitment thresholds (RTs), action potential amplitudes (MUAPAMPS), and mean firing rates (MFRs). EMG amplitude (EMGRMS) at 70% MVC was normalized (N-EMGRMS) to MVC EMGRMS. Paired samples t-tests compared the y-intercepts and slopes of the MUAPAMP and MFR vs. RT relationships and N-EMGRMS between treatments. For the MUAPAMP vs. RT relationships, the y-intercepts were greater (p=0.016) for CON than BFR, whereas the slopes were greater (p=0.024) for BFR than CON. For the MFR vs. RT relationships, the y-intercepts were greater (p=0.039) for BFR than CON, whereas the slopes were more negative (p=0.023) for BFR than CON. N-EMGRMS was greater (p=0.038) for BFR than CON. BFR accelerated higher-threshold MU recruitment, increased lower-threshold MU firing rates, and increased N-EMGRMS during a single high-intensity muscle action. BFR may be beneficial for accelerating MU recruitment in populations/scenarios where near-maximal efforts are contraindicated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The IJSM provides a forum for the publication of papers dealing with both basic and applied information that advance the field of sports medicine and exercise science, and offer a better understanding of biomedicine. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, short communications, and letters to the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信