Lyric Richardson, Alex Olmos, Tony Montgomery, Kylie Burleson, Pasquale Succi, Sean M Lubiak, Taylor K Dinyer-McNeely, Shane M Hammer, Haley C Bergstrom, Ethan C Hill, Michael A Trevino
{"title":"在高强度的非自愿性任务中,血流限制会加速招募。","authors":"Lyric Richardson, Alex Olmos, Tony Montgomery, Kylie Burleson, Pasquale Succi, Sean M Lubiak, Taylor K Dinyer-McNeely, Shane M Hammer, Haley C Bergstrom, Ethan C Hill, Michael A Trevino","doi":"10.1055/a-2644-5025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined blood flow restriction (BFR) usage and motor unit (MU) behavior of the biceps brachii during a single high-intensity contraction. Twelve resistance-trained males (25±5 y) completed maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of the elbow flexors, followed by a 70% MVC with BFR and without BFR (CON). Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals from the 70% MVCs were decomposed to extract MU: recruitment thresholds (RTs), action potential amplitudes (MUAP<sub>AMPS</sub>), and mean firing rates (MFRs). EMG amplitude (EMG<sub>RMS</sub>) at 70% MVC was normalized (N-EMG<sub>RMS</sub>) to MVC EMG<sub>RMS</sub>. Paired samples <i>t</i>-tests compared the <i>y</i>-intercepts and slopes of the MUAP<sub>AMP</sub> and MFR vs. RT relationships and N-EMG<sub>RMS</sub> between treatments. For the MUAP<sub>AMP</sub> vs. RT relationships, the <i>y</i>-intercepts were greater (<i>p</i>=0.016) for CON than BFR, whereas the slopes were greater (<i>p</i>=0.024) for BFR than CON. For the MFR vs. RT relationships, the <i>y</i>-intercepts were greater (<i>p</i>=0.039) for BFR than CON, whereas the slopes were more negative (<i>p</i>=0.023) for BFR than CON. N-EMG<sub>RMS</sub> was greater (<i>p</i>=0.038) for BFR than CON. BFR accelerated higher-threshold MU recruitment, increased lower-threshold MU firing rates, and increased N-EMG<sub>RMS</sub> during a single high-intensity muscle action. BFR may be beneficial for accelerating MU recruitment in populations/scenarios where near-maximal efforts are contraindicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":14439,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood Flow Restriction Accelerates Recruitment During a High-Intensity Non-Volitional Task.\",\"authors\":\"Lyric Richardson, Alex Olmos, Tony Montgomery, Kylie Burleson, Pasquale Succi, Sean M Lubiak, Taylor K Dinyer-McNeely, Shane M Hammer, Haley C Bergstrom, Ethan C Hill, Michael A Trevino\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2644-5025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined blood flow restriction (BFR) usage and motor unit (MU) behavior of the biceps brachii during a single high-intensity contraction. Twelve resistance-trained males (25±5 y) completed maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of the elbow flexors, followed by a 70% MVC with BFR and without BFR (CON). Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals from the 70% MVCs were decomposed to extract MU: recruitment thresholds (RTs), action potential amplitudes (MUAP<sub>AMPS</sub>), and mean firing rates (MFRs). EMG amplitude (EMG<sub>RMS</sub>) at 70% MVC was normalized (N-EMG<sub>RMS</sub>) to MVC EMG<sub>RMS</sub>. Paired samples <i>t</i>-tests compared the <i>y</i>-intercepts and slopes of the MUAP<sub>AMP</sub> and MFR vs. RT relationships and N-EMG<sub>RMS</sub> between treatments. For the MUAP<sub>AMP</sub> vs. RT relationships, the <i>y</i>-intercepts were greater (<i>p</i>=0.016) for CON than BFR, whereas the slopes were greater (<i>p</i>=0.024) for BFR than CON. For the MFR vs. RT relationships, the <i>y</i>-intercepts were greater (<i>p</i>=0.039) for BFR than CON, whereas the slopes were more negative (<i>p</i>=0.023) for BFR than CON. N-EMG<sub>RMS</sub> was greater (<i>p</i>=0.038) for BFR than CON. BFR accelerated higher-threshold MU recruitment, increased lower-threshold MU firing rates, and increased N-EMG<sub>RMS</sub> during a single high-intensity muscle action. BFR may be beneficial for accelerating MU recruitment in populations/scenarios where near-maximal efforts are contraindicated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of sports medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of sports medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2644-5025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2644-5025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Blood Flow Restriction Accelerates Recruitment During a High-Intensity Non-Volitional Task.
This study examined blood flow restriction (BFR) usage and motor unit (MU) behavior of the biceps brachii during a single high-intensity contraction. Twelve resistance-trained males (25±5 y) completed maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of the elbow flexors, followed by a 70% MVC with BFR and without BFR (CON). Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals from the 70% MVCs were decomposed to extract MU: recruitment thresholds (RTs), action potential amplitudes (MUAPAMPS), and mean firing rates (MFRs). EMG amplitude (EMGRMS) at 70% MVC was normalized (N-EMGRMS) to MVC EMGRMS. Paired samples t-tests compared the y-intercepts and slopes of the MUAPAMP and MFR vs. RT relationships and N-EMGRMS between treatments. For the MUAPAMP vs. RT relationships, the y-intercepts were greater (p=0.016) for CON than BFR, whereas the slopes were greater (p=0.024) for BFR than CON. For the MFR vs. RT relationships, the y-intercepts were greater (p=0.039) for BFR than CON, whereas the slopes were more negative (p=0.023) for BFR than CON. N-EMGRMS was greater (p=0.038) for BFR than CON. BFR accelerated higher-threshold MU recruitment, increased lower-threshold MU firing rates, and increased N-EMGRMS during a single high-intensity muscle action. BFR may be beneficial for accelerating MU recruitment in populations/scenarios where near-maximal efforts are contraindicated.
期刊介绍:
The IJSM provides a forum for the publication of papers dealing with both basic and applied information that advance the field of sports medicine and exercise science, and offer a better understanding of biomedicine. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, short communications, and letters to the Editors.