生物可降解废物可持续管理替代方案的比较分析。

IF 8.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Rıfat Yıldırım
{"title":"生物可降解废物可持续管理替代方案的比较分析。","authors":"Rıfat Yıldırım","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjaf078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The main focus of this study is to evaluate possible alternatives for organic waste disposal and compare different waste management options in order to determine the most appropriate disposal method for bio-wastes in sustainable waste management. With increasing urbanization and population growth, managing bio-wastes has become critical for environmentally friendly solutions. Traditional landfill methods contribute to global warming through greenhouse gas emissions, while methods such as composting, biogas production, bokashi, vermicomposting, and biochar production, which offer bio-based product generation and renewable energy potential, present sustainable alternatives. In this research, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a multi-criteria decision-making method, was used to evaluate these methods based on criteria such as investment costs, operating costs, carbon footprint, energy recovery, and contributions to agricultural health. The AHP results indicate that biogas is the most suitable method for bio-wastes management. Despite high initial investment and operating costs, biogas is highlighted for its significant carbon footprint reduction and high energy efficiency. Biochar and compost rank second and third, respectively, followed by bokashi and vermicompost among the evaluated options. These findings show that biogas plants around the world have significant potential as a renewable energy source and can help reduce dependence on external energy sources. This study evaluates bio-waste disposal methods with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Alternatives for Sustainable Management of Biodegradable Wastes.\",\"authors\":\"Rıfat Yıldırım\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/inteam/vjaf078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The main focus of this study is to evaluate possible alternatives for organic waste disposal and compare different waste management options in order to determine the most appropriate disposal method for bio-wastes in sustainable waste management. With increasing urbanization and population growth, managing bio-wastes has become critical for environmentally friendly solutions. Traditional landfill methods contribute to global warming through greenhouse gas emissions, while methods such as composting, biogas production, bokashi, vermicomposting, and biochar production, which offer bio-based product generation and renewable energy potential, present sustainable alternatives. In this research, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a multi-criteria decision-making method, was used to evaluate these methods based on criteria such as investment costs, operating costs, carbon footprint, energy recovery, and contributions to agricultural health. The AHP results indicate that biogas is the most suitable method for bio-wastes management. Despite high initial investment and operating costs, biogas is highlighted for its significant carbon footprint reduction and high energy efficiency. Biochar and compost rank second and third, respectively, followed by bokashi and vermicompost among the evaluated options. These findings show that biogas plants around the world have significant potential as a renewable energy source and can help reduce dependence on external energy sources. This study evaluates bio-waste disposal methods with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf078\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要重点是评估有机废物处理的可能替代方案,并比较不同的废物管理方案,以确定可持续废物管理中最合适的生物废物处理方法。随着城市化和人口增长的加剧,管理生物废物已成为环境友好解决方案的关键。传统的填埋方法通过温室气体排放导致全球变暖,而堆肥、沼气生产、bokashi、蚯蚓堆肥和生物炭生产等方法提供了生物基产品生产和可再生能源潜力,提供了可持续的替代方案。基于投资成本、运营成本、碳足迹、能源回收和对农业健康的贡献等标准,采用层次分析法(AHP)对这些方法进行评价。AHP结果表明,沼气是最适合处理生物废弃物的方法。尽管初始投资和运营成本很高,但沼气因其显著的碳足迹减少和高能效而备受关注。生物炭和堆肥分别排在第二位和第三位,其次是bokashi和蚯蚓堆肥。这些发现表明,世界各地的沼气厂作为一种可再生能源具有巨大的潜力,可以帮助减少对外部能源的依赖。本研究运用层次分析法(AHP)对生物废弃物处理方法进行评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Alternatives for Sustainable Management of Biodegradable Wastes.

The main focus of this study is to evaluate possible alternatives for organic waste disposal and compare different waste management options in order to determine the most appropriate disposal method for bio-wastes in sustainable waste management. With increasing urbanization and population growth, managing bio-wastes has become critical for environmentally friendly solutions. Traditional landfill methods contribute to global warming through greenhouse gas emissions, while methods such as composting, biogas production, bokashi, vermicomposting, and biochar production, which offer bio-based product generation and renewable energy potential, present sustainable alternatives. In this research, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a multi-criteria decision-making method, was used to evaluate these methods based on criteria such as investment costs, operating costs, carbon footprint, energy recovery, and contributions to agricultural health. The AHP results indicate that biogas is the most suitable method for bio-wastes management. Despite high initial investment and operating costs, biogas is highlighted for its significant carbon footprint reduction and high energy efficiency. Biochar and compost rank second and third, respectively, followed by bokashi and vermicompost among the evaluated options. These findings show that biogas plants around the world have significant potential as a renewable energy source and can help reduce dependence on external energy sources. This study evaluates bio-waste disposal methods with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESTOXICOLOGY&nbs-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas: Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making Health and ecological risk and impact assessment Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems Sustaining ecosystems Managing large-scale environmental change Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society: Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信