全身或局部使用双膦酸盐与动物正畸牙齿运动:系统综述。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Fryal Mohammad Ali Rahme, Ahmad S Burhan, Mohammad Y Hajeer, Fehmie R Nawaya
{"title":"全身或局部使用双膦酸盐与动物正畸牙齿运动:系统综述。","authors":"Fryal Mohammad Ali Rahme, Ahmad S Burhan, Mohammad Y Hajeer, Fehmie R Nawaya","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjaf027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Applying a pharmacological substance to provide appropriate anchorage is a simple procedure that does not depend on the patient, does not irritate the soft tissue inside or outside the mouth, is accepted by the patient aesthetically, and has a lower cost than anchorage devices. Bisphosphonates (BPs) have been suggested in the orthodontic literature for anchorage, but there is little evidence regarding their effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review aimed to assess the quality of evidence from animal research that demonstrated how bisphosphonate, when administered locally and systemically, reduced the movement of teeth in orthodontics.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We performed a broad electronic search to retrieve relevant studies from eight databases and hand-searching from 1990 up to June 2024 to identify the animal trials that met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>The review included animal studies that evaluated the rate of tooth movement following localized injection of bisphosphonates with simulated orthodontic tooth movement.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>The Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation's tool (SYRCLE) was used to assess the risk of bias for the included papers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>690 titles were found using the search method. Following screening, 361 articles were excluded. The full texts of the remaining 65 papers were read entirely, and ten papers were included in this review. Two studies were judged as having a 'low risk of bias', whereas the other showed an 'unclear risk of bias'. When BPs treatment was used in comparison to the naive and saline groups, the results showed a decrease in OTM, osteoclast number, and alveolar bone loss, but there are conflicting findings about how BPs affect root resorption. In the periodontal ligament, the BPs groups showed decreased vascularization and increased necrotic zones without causing osteonecrosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Local or systemic application of bisphosphonate can alter the bone remodeling cycle, affecting osteoclast activity and, consequently, orthodontic tooth movement. So, they could be applied to give a high degree of anchorage to limit adverse movement. However, longer-term research is needed to evaluate potential side effects from bisphosphonate use during orthodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The systematic review protocol was registered on 23/8/2022 in the National Institute of Health Research's PROSPERO; the registration number is CRD42022348745.</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":"47 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic or local administration of bisphosphonate and the orthodontic tooth movement in animals: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Fryal Mohammad Ali Rahme, Ahmad S Burhan, Mohammad Y Hajeer, Fehmie R Nawaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ejo/cjaf027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Applying a pharmacological substance to provide appropriate anchorage is a simple procedure that does not depend on the patient, does not irritate the soft tissue inside or outside the mouth, is accepted by the patient aesthetically, and has a lower cost than anchorage devices. Bisphosphonates (BPs) have been suggested in the orthodontic literature for anchorage, but there is little evidence regarding their effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review aimed to assess the quality of evidence from animal research that demonstrated how bisphosphonate, when administered locally and systemically, reduced the movement of teeth in orthodontics.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We performed a broad electronic search to retrieve relevant studies from eight databases and hand-searching from 1990 up to June 2024 to identify the animal trials that met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>The review included animal studies that evaluated the rate of tooth movement following localized injection of bisphosphonates with simulated orthodontic tooth movement.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>The Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation's tool (SYRCLE) was used to assess the risk of bias for the included papers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>690 titles were found using the search method. Following screening, 361 articles were excluded. The full texts of the remaining 65 papers were read entirely, and ten papers were included in this review. Two studies were judged as having a 'low risk of bias', whereas the other showed an 'unclear risk of bias'. When BPs treatment was used in comparison to the naive and saline groups, the results showed a decrease in OTM, osteoclast number, and alveolar bone loss, but there are conflicting findings about how BPs affect root resorption. In the periodontal ligament, the BPs groups showed decreased vascularization and increased necrotic zones without causing osteonecrosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Local or systemic application of bisphosphonate can alter the bone remodeling cycle, affecting osteoclast activity and, consequently, orthodontic tooth movement. So, they could be applied to give a high degree of anchorage to limit adverse movement. However, longer-term research is needed to evaluate potential side effects from bisphosphonate use during orthodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The systematic review protocol was registered on 23/8/2022 in the National Institute of Health Research's PROSPERO; the registration number is CRD42022348745.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:应用药理学物质提供适当的锚定是一种简单的程序,不依赖于患者,不会刺激口腔内外的软组织,患者在美学上可以接受,并且比锚定装置成本更低。双膦酸盐(bp)在正畸文献中被建议用于支抗,但关于其有效性的证据很少。目的:本系统综述旨在评估来自动物研究的证据的质量,这些证据表明,局部和全身使用双膦酸盐可以减少正畸中牙齿的运动。检索方法:我们进行了广泛的电子检索,从8个数据库检索相关研究,并从1990年至2024年6月进行了人工检索,以确定符合本系统评价纳入标准的动物试验。选择标准:该综述包括动物研究,评估局部注射双膦酸盐后模拟正畸牙齿移动的牙齿移动率。数据收集和分析:使用实验动物实验系统评价中心的工具(sycle)评估纳入论文的偏倚风险。结果:检索到690篇文献。经过筛选,361篇文章被排除在外。对剩余的65篇论文进行全文阅读,其中10篇论文被纳入本综述。两项研究被判定为“低偏倚风险”,而另一项研究显示“偏倚风险不明确”。与未治疗组和生理盐水组相比,bp治疗的结果显示OTM、破骨细胞数量和牙槽骨丢失减少,但bp如何影响牙根吸收存在矛盾的发现。在牙周韧带中,bp组血管化减少,坏死区增加,但未引起骨坏死。结论:局部或全身应用双膦酸盐可改变骨重塑周期,影响破骨细胞活性,从而影响正畸牙齿的运动。因此,它们可以用于提供高度锚固以限制不利运动。然而,需要长期的研究来评估在正畸治疗中使用双膦酸盐的潜在副作用。注册:系统评价方案于23/8/2022在美国国立卫生研究院的PROSPERO注册;注册号为CRD42022348745。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systemic or local administration of bisphosphonate and the orthodontic tooth movement in animals: a systematic review.

Background: Applying a pharmacological substance to provide appropriate anchorage is a simple procedure that does not depend on the patient, does not irritate the soft tissue inside or outside the mouth, is accepted by the patient aesthetically, and has a lower cost than anchorage devices. Bisphosphonates (BPs) have been suggested in the orthodontic literature for anchorage, but there is little evidence regarding their effectiveness.

Objectives: This systematic review aimed to assess the quality of evidence from animal research that demonstrated how bisphosphonate, when administered locally and systemically, reduced the movement of teeth in orthodontics.

Search methods: We performed a broad electronic search to retrieve relevant studies from eight databases and hand-searching from 1990 up to June 2024 to identify the animal trials that met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review.

Selection criteria: The review included animal studies that evaluated the rate of tooth movement following localized injection of bisphosphonates with simulated orthodontic tooth movement.

Data collection and analysis: The Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation's tool (SYRCLE) was used to assess the risk of bias for the included papers.

Results: 690 titles were found using the search method. Following screening, 361 articles were excluded. The full texts of the remaining 65 papers were read entirely, and ten papers were included in this review. Two studies were judged as having a 'low risk of bias', whereas the other showed an 'unclear risk of bias'. When BPs treatment was used in comparison to the naive and saline groups, the results showed a decrease in OTM, osteoclast number, and alveolar bone loss, but there are conflicting findings about how BPs affect root resorption. In the periodontal ligament, the BPs groups showed decreased vascularization and increased necrotic zones without causing osteonecrosis.

Conclusions: Local or systemic application of bisphosphonate can alter the bone remodeling cycle, affecting osteoclast activity and, consequently, orthodontic tooth movement. So, they could be applied to give a high degree of anchorage to limit adverse movement. However, longer-term research is needed to evaluate potential side effects from bisphosphonate use during orthodontic treatment.

Registration: The systematic review protocol was registered on 23/8/2022 in the National Institute of Health Research's PROSPERO; the registration number is CRD42022348745.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of orthodontics
European journal of orthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信