三种商用人胚胎玻璃化冷冻试剂盒对马体内胚胎冷冻保存效果的比较。

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Sandra Wilsher, Ann Ismer, Agustina Grippo, Maarten Hoogewijs, Pedro Bussade, Sofia Kovacsy
{"title":"三种商用人胚胎玻璃化冷冻试剂盒对马体内胚胎冷冻保存效果的比较。","authors":"Sandra Wilsher, Ann Ismer, Agustina Grippo, Maarten Hoogewijs, Pedro Bussade, Sofia Kovacsy","doi":"10.1111/evj.14539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different cryoprotectants can influence the ability of embryos to successfully survive vitrification and subsequent warming before transfer.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare pregnancy rates for embryos ≤500 μm vitrified, without puncture or aspiration of the blastocoele cavity, with one of three commercial human embryo vitrification kits containing the same penetrating cryoprotectants (DMSO and EG) but varying in their non-penetrating cryoprotectants (NPCPAs; sucrose, trehalose, dextran serum supplement [DSS], and hydroxypropyl cellulose [HPC]).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In vivo experiments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embryos (n = 108) were vitrified using either a Kitazato (NPCPAs = trehalose, hydroxypropyl cellulose), Vit Kit Freeze (NPCPAs = sucrose, DSS), or Vit Kit Freeze NX (NPCPAs = trehalose, DSS) vitrification kit by exposing each embryo to kit-specific equilibration solution for 15 min, before the vitrification solution for ≤90 sec including loading onto a Cryolock device, which was capped and plunged into LN2. All embryos were warmed in the same media by placing the Cryolock tip into 1 mL of 1.0 M sucrose in a HEPES-based medium (1 min), followed by 0.5 M sucrose (4 min) and then commercial Holding medium (4 min) before transfer to a Day 6 recipient mare. For each kit, embryos were divided by size into three groups (G1 ≤ 300 μm; G2 > 300-400 μm; G3 > 400-500 μm; n = 8-14/group/kit).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pregnancy rates were equivalent for the Kitazato, Vit Kit Freeze, and Vit Kit Freeze NX kits for embryos in G1 (12/14 [85.7%] vs. 8/11 [72.7%] vs. 7/8 [87.5%], respectively, p = 0.63) and for G2 (10/12 [83.3%] vs. 10/11 [90.9%] vs. 9/11 [81.8%], respectively, p = 0.81). For G3 embryos, pregnancy rates were higher for the Kitazato versus either of the other kits (10/14 [71.4%] vs. 3/12 [21.4%] vs. 2/14 [14.3%], respectively, p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Main limitations: </strong>Limited numbers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different non-penetrating/extracellular cryoprotectants can influence the success of vitrifying equine embryos 400-500 μm. The combination of trehalose and hydroxypropyl cellulose appears to be beneficial in this respect.</p>","PeriodicalId":11796,"journal":{"name":"Equine Veterinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of the efficacy of three commercial human embryo vitrification kits for cryopreservation of in vivo produced equine embryos.\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Wilsher, Ann Ismer, Agustina Grippo, Maarten Hoogewijs, Pedro Bussade, Sofia Kovacsy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/evj.14539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different cryoprotectants can influence the ability of embryos to successfully survive vitrification and subsequent warming before transfer.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare pregnancy rates for embryos ≤500 μm vitrified, without puncture or aspiration of the blastocoele cavity, with one of three commercial human embryo vitrification kits containing the same penetrating cryoprotectants (DMSO and EG) but varying in their non-penetrating cryoprotectants (NPCPAs; sucrose, trehalose, dextran serum supplement [DSS], and hydroxypropyl cellulose [HPC]).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In vivo experiments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embryos (n = 108) were vitrified using either a Kitazato (NPCPAs = trehalose, hydroxypropyl cellulose), Vit Kit Freeze (NPCPAs = sucrose, DSS), or Vit Kit Freeze NX (NPCPAs = trehalose, DSS) vitrification kit by exposing each embryo to kit-specific equilibration solution for 15 min, before the vitrification solution for ≤90 sec including loading onto a Cryolock device, which was capped and plunged into LN2. All embryos were warmed in the same media by placing the Cryolock tip into 1 mL of 1.0 M sucrose in a HEPES-based medium (1 min), followed by 0.5 M sucrose (4 min) and then commercial Holding medium (4 min) before transfer to a Day 6 recipient mare. For each kit, embryos were divided by size into three groups (G1 ≤ 300 μm; G2 > 300-400 μm; G3 > 400-500 μm; n = 8-14/group/kit).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pregnancy rates were equivalent for the Kitazato, Vit Kit Freeze, and Vit Kit Freeze NX kits for embryos in G1 (12/14 [85.7%] vs. 8/11 [72.7%] vs. 7/8 [87.5%], respectively, p = 0.63) and for G2 (10/12 [83.3%] vs. 10/11 [90.9%] vs. 9/11 [81.8%], respectively, p = 0.81). For G3 embryos, pregnancy rates were higher for the Kitazato versus either of the other kits (10/14 [71.4%] vs. 3/12 [21.4%] vs. 2/14 [14.3%], respectively, p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Main limitations: </strong>Limited numbers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different non-penetrating/extracellular cryoprotectants can influence the success of vitrifying equine embryos 400-500 μm. The combination of trehalose and hydroxypropyl cellulose appears to be beneficial in this respect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Equine Veterinary Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Equine Veterinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14539\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equine Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14539","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不同的冷冻保护剂会影响胚胎在移植前玻璃化和随后的加热中成功存活的能力。目的:比较三种商用人胚胎玻璃化试剂盒中含有相同的穿透性冷冻保护剂(DMSO和EG),但其非穿透性冷冻保护剂(npcpa)不同的胚胎,在不穿刺或抽吸囊胚腔的情况下,玻璃化≤500 μm的胚胎的妊娠率;蔗糖,海藻糖,葡聚糖血清补充剂[DSS]和羟丙基纤维素[HPC])。研究设计:体内实验。方法:胚胎(n = 108)使用Kitazato (NPCPAs =海藻糖,羟丙基纤维素),Vit Kit Freeze (NPCPAs =蔗糖,DSS)或Vit Kit Freeze NX (NPCPAs =海藻糖,DSS)玻璃化试剂盒进行玻璃化,将每个胚胎暴露在试剂盒特定的平衡液中15分钟,然后玻璃化溶液≤90秒,包括上传到冷冻装置上,盖上盖子并放入LN2中。所有胚胎在相同的培养基中加热,将cryrock尖端放入以hepes为基础的培养基中1ml 1.0 M蔗糖中(1分钟),然后放入0.5 M蔗糖(4分钟),然后放入商业持有培养基(4分钟),然后转移到第6天的受体母马。每个试剂盒中,胚胎按大小分为3组(G1≤300 μm;G2 > 300-400 μm;G3 > 400-500 μm;n = 8-14/组/试剂盒)。结果:G1期胚胎Kitazato、Vit Kit Freeze和Vit Kit Freeze NX试剂盒的妊娠率相等(分别为12/14[85.7%]、8/11[72.7%]、7/8 [87.5%],p = 0.63), G2期胚胎(分别为10/12[83.3%]、10/11[90.9%]、9/11 [81.8%],p = 0.81)。对于G3胚胎,Kitazato的妊娠率高于其他两组(分别为10/14[71.4%]、3/12[21.4%]和2/14 [14.3%],p = 0.003)。主要限制:数量有限。结论:不同的非穿透性/细胞外冷冻保护剂会影响400 ~ 500 μm马胚胎玻璃化的成功率。海藻糖和羟丙基纤维素的组合在这方面似乎是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of the efficacy of three commercial human embryo vitrification kits for cryopreservation of in vivo produced equine embryos.

Background: Different cryoprotectants can influence the ability of embryos to successfully survive vitrification and subsequent warming before transfer.

Objectives: To compare pregnancy rates for embryos ≤500 μm vitrified, without puncture or aspiration of the blastocoele cavity, with one of three commercial human embryo vitrification kits containing the same penetrating cryoprotectants (DMSO and EG) but varying in their non-penetrating cryoprotectants (NPCPAs; sucrose, trehalose, dextran serum supplement [DSS], and hydroxypropyl cellulose [HPC]).

Study design: In vivo experiments.

Methods: Embryos (n = 108) were vitrified using either a Kitazato (NPCPAs = trehalose, hydroxypropyl cellulose), Vit Kit Freeze (NPCPAs = sucrose, DSS), or Vit Kit Freeze NX (NPCPAs = trehalose, DSS) vitrification kit by exposing each embryo to kit-specific equilibration solution for 15 min, before the vitrification solution for ≤90 sec including loading onto a Cryolock device, which was capped and plunged into LN2. All embryos were warmed in the same media by placing the Cryolock tip into 1 mL of 1.0 M sucrose in a HEPES-based medium (1 min), followed by 0.5 M sucrose (4 min) and then commercial Holding medium (4 min) before transfer to a Day 6 recipient mare. For each kit, embryos were divided by size into three groups (G1 ≤ 300 μm; G2 > 300-400 μm; G3 > 400-500 μm; n = 8-14/group/kit).

Results: Pregnancy rates were equivalent for the Kitazato, Vit Kit Freeze, and Vit Kit Freeze NX kits for embryos in G1 (12/14 [85.7%] vs. 8/11 [72.7%] vs. 7/8 [87.5%], respectively, p = 0.63) and for G2 (10/12 [83.3%] vs. 10/11 [90.9%] vs. 9/11 [81.8%], respectively, p = 0.81). For G3 embryos, pregnancy rates were higher for the Kitazato versus either of the other kits (10/14 [71.4%] vs. 3/12 [21.4%] vs. 2/14 [14.3%], respectively, p = 0.003).

Main limitations: Limited numbers.

Conclusions: Different non-penetrating/extracellular cryoprotectants can influence the success of vitrifying equine embryos 400-500 μm. The combination of trehalose and hydroxypropyl cellulose appears to be beneficial in this respect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Equine Veterinary Journal
Equine Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Equine Veterinary Journal publishes evidence to improve clinical practice or expand scientific knowledge underpinning equine veterinary medicine. This unrivalled international scientific journal is published 6 times per year, containing peer-reviewed articles with original and potentially important findings. Contributions are received from sources worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信