促红细胞生成剂类型对血液透析患者恶性肿瘤的影响。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-16 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfaf148
Seok Hui Kang, Yu Jeong Lim, Bo Yeon Kim, Ji Young Choi, Jun Young Do
{"title":"促红细胞生成剂类型对血液透析患者恶性肿瘤的影响。","authors":"Seok Hui Kang, Yu Jeong Lim, Bo Yeon Kim, Ji Young Choi, Jun Young Do","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfaf148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) types vary in their affinity for receptors, investigating their association with malignancies could offer valuable insights. This study aims to evaluate the effect of ESA types on malignancy incidence in hemodialysis (HD) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service has operated a nationwide HD quality assessment program to address the high medical costs and mortality rates among HD patients. This retrospective study analyzed data from 33 960 HD patients, who underwent fourth and fifth HD quality assessments. Participants were divided into three groups: short-, intermediate- and long-acting groups. The onset of any malignancy was defined as the date of the first diagnosis based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes for the 12 most common malignancies. Patient survival was assessed for those with a first diagnosis of any malignancy during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The short-, intermediate- and long-acting groups comprised 26 006, 6448 and 1506 patients, respectively (over ∼75 months of follow-up). The 5-year malignancy-free rates were 88.4%, 88.2% and 87.0% for short-, intermediate- and long-acting groups, respectively (<i>P</i> = .024 for short/intermediate-acting vs long-acting group). Univariable and multivariable analyses showed higher malignancy risk in the long-acting group, especially in males, older individuals and those on higher ESA doses. We performed analyses using a balanced cohort after propensity score weighting. The balanced cohort also confirmed higher malignancy risk in the long-acting group, while survival rates remained unaffected by ESA type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our population-based cohort study reveals an association between long-acting ESAs use and the incidence of any malignancy, with a particularly strong influence on high-dose users. This suggests that avoiding long-acting ESAs may be advisable for patients at high risk of malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"18 6","pages":"sfaf148"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12199780/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent types on malignancy in hemodialysis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Seok Hui Kang, Yu Jeong Lim, Bo Yeon Kim, Ji Young Choi, Jun Young Do\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ckj/sfaf148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) types vary in their affinity for receptors, investigating their association with malignancies could offer valuable insights. This study aims to evaluate the effect of ESA types on malignancy incidence in hemodialysis (HD) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service has operated a nationwide HD quality assessment program to address the high medical costs and mortality rates among HD patients. This retrospective study analyzed data from 33 960 HD patients, who underwent fourth and fifth HD quality assessments. Participants were divided into three groups: short-, intermediate- and long-acting groups. The onset of any malignancy was defined as the date of the first diagnosis based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes for the 12 most common malignancies. Patient survival was assessed for those with a first diagnosis of any malignancy during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The short-, intermediate- and long-acting groups comprised 26 006, 6448 and 1506 patients, respectively (over ∼75 months of follow-up). The 5-year malignancy-free rates were 88.4%, 88.2% and 87.0% for short-, intermediate- and long-acting groups, respectively (<i>P</i> = .024 for short/intermediate-acting vs long-acting group). Univariable and multivariable analyses showed higher malignancy risk in the long-acting group, especially in males, older individuals and those on higher ESA doses. We performed analyses using a balanced cohort after propensity score weighting. The balanced cohort also confirmed higher malignancy risk in the long-acting group, while survival rates remained unaffected by ESA type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our population-based cohort study reveals an association between long-acting ESAs use and the incidence of any malignancy, with a particularly strong influence on high-dose users. This suggests that avoiding long-acting ESAs may be advisable for patients at high risk of malignancy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"volume\":\"18 6\",\"pages\":\"sfaf148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12199780/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf148\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于促红细胞生成剂(ESA)类型对受体的亲和力不同,研究它们与恶性肿瘤的关系可以提供有价值的见解。本研究旨在探讨ESA类型对血液透析(HD)患者恶性肿瘤发生率的影响。方法:健康保险审查和评估服务处开展了一项全国性的HD质量评估计划,以解决HD患者的高医疗费用和死亡率。这项回顾性研究分析了33960名HD患者的数据,这些患者接受了第四次和第五次HD质量评估。参与者被分为三组:短效组、中效组和长效组。根据12种最常见恶性肿瘤的《国际疾病分类》第十次修订代码,将任何恶性肿瘤的发病定义为首次诊断的日期。在随访期间对首次诊断为任何恶性肿瘤的患者进行生存评估。结果:短效、中效和长效组分别有26006例、6448例和1506例患者(随访超过75个月)。短效组、中效组和长效组5年无恶性肿瘤率分别为88.4%、88.2%和87.0%(短效/中效组与长效组P = 0.024)。单变量和多变量分析显示,长效组的恶性肿瘤风险更高,尤其是男性、老年人和服用高剂量ESA的人群。在倾向得分加权后,我们使用平衡队列进行分析。平衡队列也证实长效组的恶性肿瘤风险较高,而生存率不受ESA类型的影响。结论:我们基于人群的队列研究揭示了长效esa的使用与任何恶性肿瘤的发生率之间的关联,特别是对高剂量使用者的影响。这表明,对于恶性肿瘤高风险的患者,避免长效esa可能是可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent types on malignancy in hemodialysis patients.

Background: Since erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) types vary in their affinity for receptors, investigating their association with malignancies could offer valuable insights. This study aims to evaluate the effect of ESA types on malignancy incidence in hemodialysis (HD) patients.

Methods: The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service has operated a nationwide HD quality assessment program to address the high medical costs and mortality rates among HD patients. This retrospective study analyzed data from 33 960 HD patients, who underwent fourth and fifth HD quality assessments. Participants were divided into three groups: short-, intermediate- and long-acting groups. The onset of any malignancy was defined as the date of the first diagnosis based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes for the 12 most common malignancies. Patient survival was assessed for those with a first diagnosis of any malignancy during follow-up.

Results: The short-, intermediate- and long-acting groups comprised 26 006, 6448 and 1506 patients, respectively (over ∼75 months of follow-up). The 5-year malignancy-free rates were 88.4%, 88.2% and 87.0% for short-, intermediate- and long-acting groups, respectively (P = .024 for short/intermediate-acting vs long-acting group). Univariable and multivariable analyses showed higher malignancy risk in the long-acting group, especially in males, older individuals and those on higher ESA doses. We performed analyses using a balanced cohort after propensity score weighting. The balanced cohort also confirmed higher malignancy risk in the long-acting group, while survival rates remained unaffected by ESA type.

Conclusion: Our population-based cohort study reveals an association between long-acting ESAs use and the incidence of any malignancy, with a particularly strong influence on high-dose users. This suggests that avoiding long-acting ESAs may be advisable for patients at high risk of malignancy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信