免疫检查点抑制剂耐药非小细胞肺癌局部治疗后免疫检查点抑制剂的再挑战。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Satoshi Hirano, Tetsuo Fujita, Hidekazu Takahashi, Kento Noda, Naoki Yoshida, Kosei Matsuda, Hikaru Shojima, Kohei Shikano, Hiroyuki Amano, Makoto Nakamura, Masakatsu Onozawa, Hitoshi Araki, Takashi Aruga, Sukeyuki Nakamura
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂耐药非小细胞肺癌局部治疗后免疫检查点抑制剂的再挑战。","authors":"Satoshi Hirano, Tetsuo Fujita, Hidekazu Takahashi, Kento Noda, Naoki Yoshida, Kosei Matsuda, Hikaru Shojima, Kohei Shikano, Hiroyuki Amano, Makoto Nakamura, Masakatsu Onozawa, Hitoshi Araki, Takashi Aruga, Sukeyuki Nakamura","doi":"10.21037/cco-25-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has enabled long-term survival for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the proportion of patients achieving this is still low compared to patients with melanoma. Many NSCLC patients experience early progression (primary resistance) following ICI treatment, or relapse after initial responses (acquired resistance). While chemotherapy regimens, typically involving cytotoxic agents, are commonly used after ICI resistance, little evidence has been accumulated regarding the efficacy of ICI rechallenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ICI rechallenge in patients who experienced failure of primary treatment with ICI-containing regimens. Additionally, we assessed whether the administration of local therapy prior to rechallenge influenced the efficacy of ICI rechallenge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the records of advanced NSCLC patients for whom response was evaluated as progressive disease (PD) after receiving an ICI-containing regimen as first-line therapy and underwent rechallenge with an ICI in Funabashi Municipal Medical Center between January 2020 and March 2024. We analyzed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on whether local therapy (including beyond PD with local therapy) was performed. PFS was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method, with statistical significance set at P<0.05 using log-rank testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 20 patients, with 10 patients in the local therapy group and 10 in the no-local therapy group. No significant differences in patient characteristics were apparent between groups, although the no-local therapy group tended to show a higher number of organs with residual metastases at the time of rechallenge. When ICI rechallenge was administered after local therapy, median PFS was significantly longer in the local therapy group (9.0 months) than in the no-local therapy group (1.6 months, P=0.02), particularly in cases where radiation therapy was applied to the primary lesion just before rechallenge. However, no significant difference in OS was evident between the local treatment group (21.4 months) and the no-local treatment group (18.8 months; P=0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rechallenge with ICI following local therapy in NSCLC patients who developed resistance to ICIs may extend PFS, suggesting potential value as a therapeutic option.</p>","PeriodicalId":9945,"journal":{"name":"Chinese clinical oncology","volume":"14 3","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitor after local therapy for immune checkpoint inhibitor-resistant non-small cell lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Hirano, Tetsuo Fujita, Hidekazu Takahashi, Kento Noda, Naoki Yoshida, Kosei Matsuda, Hikaru Shojima, Kohei Shikano, Hiroyuki Amano, Makoto Nakamura, Masakatsu Onozawa, Hitoshi Araki, Takashi Aruga, Sukeyuki Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/cco-25-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has enabled long-term survival for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the proportion of patients achieving this is still low compared to patients with melanoma. Many NSCLC patients experience early progression (primary resistance) following ICI treatment, or relapse after initial responses (acquired resistance). While chemotherapy regimens, typically involving cytotoxic agents, are commonly used after ICI resistance, little evidence has been accumulated regarding the efficacy of ICI rechallenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ICI rechallenge in patients who experienced failure of primary treatment with ICI-containing regimens. Additionally, we assessed whether the administration of local therapy prior to rechallenge influenced the efficacy of ICI rechallenge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the records of advanced NSCLC patients for whom response was evaluated as progressive disease (PD) after receiving an ICI-containing regimen as first-line therapy and underwent rechallenge with an ICI in Funabashi Municipal Medical Center between January 2020 and March 2024. We analyzed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on whether local therapy (including beyond PD with local therapy) was performed. PFS was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method, with statistical significance set at P<0.05 using log-rank testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 20 patients, with 10 patients in the local therapy group and 10 in the no-local therapy group. No significant differences in patient characteristics were apparent between groups, although the no-local therapy group tended to show a higher number of organs with residual metastases at the time of rechallenge. When ICI rechallenge was administered after local therapy, median PFS was significantly longer in the local therapy group (9.0 months) than in the no-local therapy group (1.6 months, P=0.02), particularly in cases where radiation therapy was applied to the primary lesion just before rechallenge. However, no significant difference in OS was evident between the local treatment group (21.4 months) and the no-local treatment group (18.8 months; P=0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rechallenge with ICI following local therapy in NSCLC patients who developed resistance to ICIs may extend PFS, suggesting potential value as a therapeutic option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-25-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-25-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的引入使非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的长期生存成为可能。然而,与黑色素瘤患者相比,实现这一目标的患者比例仍然很低。许多NSCLC患者在ICI治疗后出现早期进展(原发性耐药),或在初始反应后复发(获得性耐药)。虽然在ICI耐药后通常使用化疗方案(通常包括细胞毒性药物),但很少有证据表明ICI再挑战的有效性。本研究的目的是评估ICI再挑战在首次使用含ICI方案治疗失败的患者中的疗效。此外,我们评估了再挑战前的局部治疗是否会影响ICI再挑战的疗效。方法:我们回顾性回顾了2020年1月至2024年3月在船桥市医疗中心接受含ICI方案作为一线治疗并再次接受ICI治疗后,被评估为进展性疾病(PD)的晚期NSCLC患者的记录。我们分析了无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)基于是否进行局部治疗(包括局部治疗的PD以外)。采用Kaplan-Meier法比较PFS,结果有统计学意义:本研究纳入20例患者,局部治疗组10例,非局部治疗组10例。两组患者特征无明显差异,尽管非局部治疗组在再挑战时倾向于显示更多残留转移的器官。当局部治疗后再给予ICI时,局部治疗组的中位PFS(9.0个月)明显长于非局部治疗组(1.6个月,P=0.02),特别是在再治疗前对原发病变进行放射治疗的病例。然而,局部治疗组(21.4个月)与非局部治疗组(18.8个月;P = 0.12)。结论:对ICI产生耐药性的非小细胞肺癌患者在局部治疗后再次使用ICI可能延长PFS,表明其作为治疗选择的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitor after local therapy for immune checkpoint inhibitor-resistant non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has enabled long-term survival for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the proportion of patients achieving this is still low compared to patients with melanoma. Many NSCLC patients experience early progression (primary resistance) following ICI treatment, or relapse after initial responses (acquired resistance). While chemotherapy regimens, typically involving cytotoxic agents, are commonly used after ICI resistance, little evidence has been accumulated regarding the efficacy of ICI rechallenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ICI rechallenge in patients who experienced failure of primary treatment with ICI-containing regimens. Additionally, we assessed whether the administration of local therapy prior to rechallenge influenced the efficacy of ICI rechallenge.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of advanced NSCLC patients for whom response was evaluated as progressive disease (PD) after receiving an ICI-containing regimen as first-line therapy and underwent rechallenge with an ICI in Funabashi Municipal Medical Center between January 2020 and March 2024. We analyzed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on whether local therapy (including beyond PD with local therapy) was performed. PFS was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method, with statistical significance set at P<0.05 using log-rank testing.

Results: The study included 20 patients, with 10 patients in the local therapy group and 10 in the no-local therapy group. No significant differences in patient characteristics were apparent between groups, although the no-local therapy group tended to show a higher number of organs with residual metastases at the time of rechallenge. When ICI rechallenge was administered after local therapy, median PFS was significantly longer in the local therapy group (9.0 months) than in the no-local therapy group (1.6 months, P=0.02), particularly in cases where radiation therapy was applied to the primary lesion just before rechallenge. However, no significant difference in OS was evident between the local treatment group (21.4 months) and the no-local treatment group (18.8 months; P=0.12).

Conclusions: Rechallenge with ICI following local therapy in NSCLC patients who developed resistance to ICIs may extend PFS, suggesting potential value as a therapeutic option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Chinese Clinical Oncology (Print ISSN 2304-3865; Online ISSN 2304-3873; Chin Clin Oncol; CCO) publishes articles that describe new findings in the field of oncology, and provides current and practical information on diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of cancer. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to: multimodality therapy, biomarkers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to cancer. The aim of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of original research articles as well as review articles in all areas related to cancer. It is an international, peer-reviewed journal with a focus on cutting-edge findings in this rapidly changing field. To that end, Chin Clin Oncol is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into best multimodality practice. The journal features a distinguished editorial board, which brings together a team of highly experienced specialists in cancer treatment and research. The diverse experience of the board members allows our editorial panel to lend their expertise to a broad spectrum of cancer subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信