机器学习算法预测肾细胞癌患者肾切除术后存活率:一项回顾性研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Peipei Wang, Zhao Hou, Dingyang Lv, Fan Cui, Huiyu Zhou, Jie Wen, Weibing Shuang
{"title":"机器学习算法预测肾细胞癌患者肾切除术后存活率:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Peipei Wang, Zhao Hou, Dingyang Lv, Fan Cui, Huiyu Zhou, Jie Wen, Weibing Shuang","doi":"10.21037/cco-24-137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor prognosis brings great physical suffering and financial burden to patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after nephrectomy. This study aims to explore the application of machine learning for feature selection in predicting survivability and construct a well-performed prognostic model for identifying and managing the high-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 737 patients with RCC after nephrectomy. Important features were respectively selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and random survival forest (RSF), and the LASSO-Cox model and RSF-Cox model were constructed in conjunction with Cox regression. And their predictive performance were evaluated and compared by the C-index, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and Kaplan-Meier curve. Besides, a Cox model was constructed using all clinical variables and compared with the C-index and AUC of the two models described above to demonstrate the necessity of feature selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 725 cases fitted this study ultimately, of which 48 died during the period of follow-up. The shared variables for the two models were tumor size, preoperative plasma fibrinogen content, N stage, and Fuhrman grade. In the training set, the C-index of the Cox, LASSO-Cox and RSF-Cox was 0.863, 0.893 and 0.874, and the 5-year AUC was 0.816, 0.880 and 0.837. And in the validation set, the C-index was 0.837, 0.856 and 0.821, and the 5-year AUC was 0.790, 0.855 and 0.852. The calibration and DCA curves suggested that the LASSO-Cox model outperformed the RSF-Cox model in survival prediction and net benefit. Significant survival differences were observed between the low and high-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LASSO-Cox model we constructed has been simplified and obtained higher efficiency, which can help to inform early intervention and clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9945,"journal":{"name":"Chinese clinical oncology","volume":"14 3","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning algorithms in predicting survivability of patients with renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Peipei Wang, Zhao Hou, Dingyang Lv, Fan Cui, Huiyu Zhou, Jie Wen, Weibing Shuang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/cco-24-137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor prognosis brings great physical suffering and financial burden to patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after nephrectomy. This study aims to explore the application of machine learning for feature selection in predicting survivability and construct a well-performed prognostic model for identifying and managing the high-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 737 patients with RCC after nephrectomy. Important features were respectively selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and random survival forest (RSF), and the LASSO-Cox model and RSF-Cox model were constructed in conjunction with Cox regression. And their predictive performance were evaluated and compared by the C-index, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and Kaplan-Meier curve. Besides, a Cox model was constructed using all clinical variables and compared with the C-index and AUC of the two models described above to demonstrate the necessity of feature selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 725 cases fitted this study ultimately, of which 48 died during the period of follow-up. The shared variables for the two models were tumor size, preoperative plasma fibrinogen content, N stage, and Fuhrman grade. In the training set, the C-index of the Cox, LASSO-Cox and RSF-Cox was 0.863, 0.893 and 0.874, and the 5-year AUC was 0.816, 0.880 and 0.837. And in the validation set, the C-index was 0.837, 0.856 and 0.821, and the 5-year AUC was 0.790, 0.855 and 0.852. The calibration and DCA curves suggested that the LASSO-Cox model outperformed the RSF-Cox model in survival prediction and net benefit. Significant survival differences were observed between the low and high-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LASSO-Cox model we constructed has been simplified and obtained higher efficiency, which can help to inform early intervention and clinical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-24-137\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-24-137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾细胞癌(RCC)术后预后不良给患者带来巨大的身体痛苦和经济负担。本研究旨在探索机器学习特征选择在预测生存能力中的应用,并构建一个性能良好的预后模型,用于识别和管理高危患者。方法:回顾性分析737例肾切除术后肾细胞癌患者。分别通过最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归和随机生存森林(RSF)选择重要特征,并结合Cox回归构建LASSO-Cox模型和RSF-Cox模型。采用c指数、校正曲线、决策曲线分析(DCA)、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)和Kaplan-Meier曲线对其预测效果进行评价和比较。此外,利用所有临床变量构建Cox模型,并与上述两种模型的C-index和AUC进行比较,以证明特征选择的必要性。结果:最终共有725例病例符合本研究,其中48例在随访期间死亡。两种模型的共同变量是肿瘤大小、术前血浆纤维蛋白原含量、N分期和Fuhrman分级。在训练集中,Cox、LASSO-Cox和RSF-Cox的c指数分别为0.863、0.893和0.874,5年AUC分别为0.816、0.880和0.837。验证集中C-index分别为0.837、0.856和0.821,5年AUC分别为0.790、0.855和0.852。校正曲线和DCA曲线显示LASSO-Cox模型在生存预测和净收益方面优于RSF-Cox模型。在低危组和高危组之间观察到显著的生存差异。结论:我们构建的LASSO-Cox模型简化了,获得了更高的效率,有助于早期干预和临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning algorithms in predicting survivability of patients with renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: a retrospective study.

Background: Poor prognosis brings great physical suffering and financial burden to patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after nephrectomy. This study aims to explore the application of machine learning for feature selection in predicting survivability and construct a well-performed prognostic model for identifying and managing the high-risk patients.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 737 patients with RCC after nephrectomy. Important features were respectively selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and random survival forest (RSF), and the LASSO-Cox model and RSF-Cox model were constructed in conjunction with Cox regression. And their predictive performance were evaluated and compared by the C-index, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and Kaplan-Meier curve. Besides, a Cox model was constructed using all clinical variables and compared with the C-index and AUC of the two models described above to demonstrate the necessity of feature selection.

Results: A total of 725 cases fitted this study ultimately, of which 48 died during the period of follow-up. The shared variables for the two models were tumor size, preoperative plasma fibrinogen content, N stage, and Fuhrman grade. In the training set, the C-index of the Cox, LASSO-Cox and RSF-Cox was 0.863, 0.893 and 0.874, and the 5-year AUC was 0.816, 0.880 and 0.837. And in the validation set, the C-index was 0.837, 0.856 and 0.821, and the 5-year AUC was 0.790, 0.855 and 0.852. The calibration and DCA curves suggested that the LASSO-Cox model outperformed the RSF-Cox model in survival prediction and net benefit. Significant survival differences were observed between the low and high-risk groups.

Conclusions: The LASSO-Cox model we constructed has been simplified and obtained higher efficiency, which can help to inform early intervention and clinical decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Chinese Clinical Oncology (Print ISSN 2304-3865; Online ISSN 2304-3873; Chin Clin Oncol; CCO) publishes articles that describe new findings in the field of oncology, and provides current and practical information on diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of cancer. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to: multimodality therapy, biomarkers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to cancer. The aim of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of original research articles as well as review articles in all areas related to cancer. It is an international, peer-reviewed journal with a focus on cutting-edge findings in this rapidly changing field. To that end, Chin Clin Oncol is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into best multimodality practice. The journal features a distinguished editorial board, which brings together a team of highly experienced specialists in cancer treatment and research. The diverse experience of the board members allows our editorial panel to lend their expertise to a broad spectrum of cancer subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信