Jingjing Xia, Yaqun Yuan, Chenxi Li, Anna Kucharska-Newton, Qu Tian, Jayant M Pinto, Jiantao Ma, Eleanor M Simonsick, Honglei Chen
{"title":"老年人的嗅觉和糖尿病。","authors":"Jingjing Xia, Yaqun Yuan, Chenxi Li, Anna Kucharska-Newton, Qu Tian, Jayant M Pinto, Jiantao Ma, Eleanor M Simonsick, Honglei Chen","doi":"10.1093/chemse/bjaf020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both poor olfaction and diabetes are common in older adults. It is biologically plausible that they may be related and interact to affect the health of older adults. We examined the association between poor olfaction and diabetes and their joint associations with mortality among 2,416 older adults from the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. Olfaction was assessed at year 3 (1999 to 2000) using the Brief Smell Identification Test (B-SIT). We used year 4 (2000 to 2001) as the study baseline and followed participants to year 11 (2007 to 2008) to identify incident diabetes and year 14 (2010 to 2011) to assess mortality. We used logistic regression to analyze the association of poor olfaction with prevalent diabetes and Cox proportional hazard models to assess its relationship to incident diabetes and its joint association with diabetes on mortality. Of the 2,416 participants, 611 (25.3%) had diabetes at baseline and 138 (7.6%) developed incident diabetes during 6.4 ± 1.7 yr of follow-up. Compared to those with good olfaction, the odds ratio of prevalent diabetes was 1.11 (95% confidence interval/CI: 0.87 to 1.42) for those with poor olfaction, and the corresponding hazard ratio (HR) for incident diabetes was 1.01 (95%CI: 0.66 to 1.57). During 8.2 ± 2.8 yr of follow-up, 1007 (41.7%) participants died. Compared with participants without poor olfaction and diabetes, those with both were twice likely to die during the follow-up (HR = 2.16, 95%CI: 1.71 to 2.73). However, we found no evidence for synergistic interaction (P = 0.97). In conclusion, poor olfaction is not associated with the risk of diabetes, and these two conditions independently predict mortality in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":9771,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Senses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Olfaction and diabetes among older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Jingjing Xia, Yaqun Yuan, Chenxi Li, Anna Kucharska-Newton, Qu Tian, Jayant M Pinto, Jiantao Ma, Eleanor M Simonsick, Honglei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/chemse/bjaf020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Both poor olfaction and diabetes are common in older adults. It is biologically plausible that they may be related and interact to affect the health of older adults. We examined the association between poor olfaction and diabetes and their joint associations with mortality among 2,416 older adults from the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. Olfaction was assessed at year 3 (1999 to 2000) using the Brief Smell Identification Test (B-SIT). We used year 4 (2000 to 2001) as the study baseline and followed participants to year 11 (2007 to 2008) to identify incident diabetes and year 14 (2010 to 2011) to assess mortality. We used logistic regression to analyze the association of poor olfaction with prevalent diabetes and Cox proportional hazard models to assess its relationship to incident diabetes and its joint association with diabetes on mortality. Of the 2,416 participants, 611 (25.3%) had diabetes at baseline and 138 (7.6%) developed incident diabetes during 6.4 ± 1.7 yr of follow-up. Compared to those with good olfaction, the odds ratio of prevalent diabetes was 1.11 (95% confidence interval/CI: 0.87 to 1.42) for those with poor olfaction, and the corresponding hazard ratio (HR) for incident diabetes was 1.01 (95%CI: 0.66 to 1.57). During 8.2 ± 2.8 yr of follow-up, 1007 (41.7%) participants died. Compared with participants without poor olfaction and diabetes, those with both were twice likely to die during the follow-up (HR = 2.16, 95%CI: 1.71 to 2.73). However, we found no evidence for synergistic interaction (P = 0.97). In conclusion, poor olfaction is not associated with the risk of diabetes, and these two conditions independently predict mortality in older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Senses\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228038/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Senses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjaf020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Senses","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjaf020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Both poor olfaction and diabetes are common in older adults. It is biologically plausible that they may be related and interact to affect the health of older adults. We examined the association between poor olfaction and diabetes and their joint associations with mortality among 2,416 older adults from the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. Olfaction was assessed at year 3 (1999 to 2000) using the Brief Smell Identification Test (B-SIT). We used year 4 (2000 to 2001) as the study baseline and followed participants to year 11 (2007 to 2008) to identify incident diabetes and year 14 (2010 to 2011) to assess mortality. We used logistic regression to analyze the association of poor olfaction with prevalent diabetes and Cox proportional hazard models to assess its relationship to incident diabetes and its joint association with diabetes on mortality. Of the 2,416 participants, 611 (25.3%) had diabetes at baseline and 138 (7.6%) developed incident diabetes during 6.4 ± 1.7 yr of follow-up. Compared to those with good olfaction, the odds ratio of prevalent diabetes was 1.11 (95% confidence interval/CI: 0.87 to 1.42) for those with poor olfaction, and the corresponding hazard ratio (HR) for incident diabetes was 1.01 (95%CI: 0.66 to 1.57). During 8.2 ± 2.8 yr of follow-up, 1007 (41.7%) participants died. Compared with participants without poor olfaction and diabetes, those with both were twice likely to die during the follow-up (HR = 2.16, 95%CI: 1.71 to 2.73). However, we found no evidence for synergistic interaction (P = 0.97). In conclusion, poor olfaction is not associated with the risk of diabetes, and these two conditions independently predict mortality in older adults.
期刊介绍:
Chemical Senses publishes original research and review papers on all aspects of chemoreception in both humans and animals. An important part of the journal''s coverage is devoted to techniques and the development and application of new methods for investigating chemoreception and chemosensory structures.