Blaine Johnson, William Riley, Michael Arcaro, Kristina Iwai, Rachel Nordgren, Maria Lucia Madariaga, Tae Song, Avery Tung
{"title":"便携式离体器官灌注劳动力调查报告:人员配备模式和临床趋势。","authors":"Blaine Johnson, William Riley, Michael Arcaro, Kristina Iwai, Rachel Nordgren, Maria Lucia Madariaga, Tae Song, Avery Tung","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Historically, organs recovered for transplant have been transported using static cold preservation. However, newer portable ex vivo organ perfusion (PEVOP) strategies allow warm organ perfusion during transport. Although PEVOP is a complex process requiring additional staffing resources, few publications address the staffing requirements for this technology. To clarify this issue, we surveyed all 35 United States institutions with PEVOP programs in 2020 and again in 2025 about organization, staffing, and training. We achieved a 100% response rate in both years. The number of institutions with active PEVOP programs decreased from 35 in 2020 to 31 in 2025, while the number of organ platforms increased from 52 to 56. The proportion of platforms operated by manufacturers surged from 17.3% to 96.4% ( p < 0.00001), while the percentage run by physicians dropped from 51.9% to 6.7% ( p = 0.00174). Challenges to adequate PEVOP staffing, including administrative and financial burdens, as well as staff reluctance, remained consistent across surveys and were significant barriers to its use. These findings may assist institutions in developing strategies to meet the future needs of the workforce while maximizing the safe and effective use of this innovative technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Report of the Portable Ex Vivo Organ Perfusion Workforce Survey: Staffing Models and Clinical Trends.\",\"authors\":\"Blaine Johnson, William Riley, Michael Arcaro, Kristina Iwai, Rachel Nordgren, Maria Lucia Madariaga, Tae Song, Avery Tung\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Historically, organs recovered for transplant have been transported using static cold preservation. However, newer portable ex vivo organ perfusion (PEVOP) strategies allow warm organ perfusion during transport. Although PEVOP is a complex process requiring additional staffing resources, few publications address the staffing requirements for this technology. To clarify this issue, we surveyed all 35 United States institutions with PEVOP programs in 2020 and again in 2025 about organization, staffing, and training. We achieved a 100% response rate in both years. The number of institutions with active PEVOP programs decreased from 35 in 2020 to 31 in 2025, while the number of organ platforms increased from 52 to 56. The proportion of platforms operated by manufacturers surged from 17.3% to 96.4% ( p < 0.00001), while the percentage run by physicians dropped from 51.9% to 6.7% ( p = 0.00174). Challenges to adequate PEVOP staffing, including administrative and financial burdens, as well as staff reluctance, remained consistent across surveys and were significant barriers to its use. These findings may assist institutions in developing strategies to meet the future needs of the workforce while maximizing the safe and effective use of this innovative technology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002477\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002477","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Report of the Portable Ex Vivo Organ Perfusion Workforce Survey: Staffing Models and Clinical Trends.
Historically, organs recovered for transplant have been transported using static cold preservation. However, newer portable ex vivo organ perfusion (PEVOP) strategies allow warm organ perfusion during transport. Although PEVOP is a complex process requiring additional staffing resources, few publications address the staffing requirements for this technology. To clarify this issue, we surveyed all 35 United States institutions with PEVOP programs in 2020 and again in 2025 about organization, staffing, and training. We achieved a 100% response rate in both years. The number of institutions with active PEVOP programs decreased from 35 in 2020 to 31 in 2025, while the number of organ platforms increased from 52 to 56. The proportion of platforms operated by manufacturers surged from 17.3% to 96.4% ( p < 0.00001), while the percentage run by physicians dropped from 51.9% to 6.7% ( p = 0.00174). Challenges to adequate PEVOP staffing, including administrative and financial burdens, as well as staff reluctance, remained consistent across surveys and were significant barriers to its use. These findings may assist institutions in developing strategies to meet the future needs of the workforce while maximizing the safe and effective use of this innovative technology.
期刊介绍:
ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world.
The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.