电动汽车锂离子电池火灾的新实验方法:火灾行为和灭火剂有效性的研究

IF 6.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 THERMODYNAMICS
Onur Mammacıoğlu, Gokhan Coskun
{"title":"电动汽车锂离子电池火灾的新实验方法:火灾行为和灭火剂有效性的研究","authors":"Onur Mammacıoğlu, Gokhan Coskun","doi":"10.1016/j.csite.2025.106554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates fire incidents in lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles and evaluates the effectiveness of extinguishing agents under controlled conditions, highlighting the difficulty of extinguishing such fires due to the materials in the lithium-based battery components. The combustion of 18650 Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide (NMC) batteries was initiated using an overheating method in a specialized safety setup. The extinguishing agents tested include Water, BIOVERSAL, NOVEC 1230, and COG (high-viscosity liquid substance). The first phase involved a single-battery combustion test, followed by intervention tests under two conditions, which were the heat supply cut off and continuous heat application. Performance was evaluated based on combustion and explosion temperatures, ignition delay, and variations in ambient gas composition (O<ce:inf loc=\"post\">2</ce:inf>, CO, CO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">2</ce:inf>). Under heat-cut conditions, BIOVERSAL exhibited superior thermal resistance (∼ 247,6 °C), while Water provided a longer ignition delay of about 82 seconds. In continuous heat conditions, COG achieved the highest explosion temperature (∼ 247 °C) and longest ignition delay about 75 seconds, significantly outperforming NOVEC 1230, which showed the lowest suppression efficiency. In conclusion, BIOVERSAL and COG were the most effective extinguishing agents, with BIOVERSAL excelling under heat-cut conditions and COG proving most efficient under continuous heat exposure.","PeriodicalId":9658,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering","volume":"144 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A NEW EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO LITHIUM-ION BATTERY FIRES IN ELECTRIC VEHICLES: INVESTIGATION OF FIRE BEHAVIOR AND EFFECTIVENESS OF EXTINGUISHING AGENTS\",\"authors\":\"Onur Mammacıoğlu, Gokhan Coskun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csite.2025.106554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates fire incidents in lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles and evaluates the effectiveness of extinguishing agents under controlled conditions, highlighting the difficulty of extinguishing such fires due to the materials in the lithium-based battery components. The combustion of 18650 Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide (NMC) batteries was initiated using an overheating method in a specialized safety setup. The extinguishing agents tested include Water, BIOVERSAL, NOVEC 1230, and COG (high-viscosity liquid substance). The first phase involved a single-battery combustion test, followed by intervention tests under two conditions, which were the heat supply cut off and continuous heat application. Performance was evaluated based on combustion and explosion temperatures, ignition delay, and variations in ambient gas composition (O<ce:inf loc=\\\"post\\\">2</ce:inf>, CO, CO<ce:inf loc=\\\"post\\\">2</ce:inf>). Under heat-cut conditions, BIOVERSAL exhibited superior thermal resistance (∼ 247,6 °C), while Water provided a longer ignition delay of about 82 seconds. In continuous heat conditions, COG achieved the highest explosion temperature (∼ 247 °C) and longest ignition delay about 75 seconds, significantly outperforming NOVEC 1230, which showed the lowest suppression efficiency. In conclusion, BIOVERSAL and COG were the most effective extinguishing agents, with BIOVERSAL excelling under heat-cut conditions and COG proving most efficient under continuous heat exposure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering\",\"volume\":\"144 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2025.106554\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"THERMODYNAMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2025.106554","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了电动汽车中使用的锂离子电池的火灾事件,并评估了在受控条件下灭火剂的有效性,强调了由于锂基电池组件材料的原因,扑灭此类火灾的难度。18650锂镍锰钴氧化物(NMC)电池的燃烧是在专门的安全设置中使用过热方法启动的。测试的灭火剂包括Water、BIOVERSAL、NOVEC 1230和COG(高粘度液体物质)。第一阶段包括单电池燃烧测试,随后是两种条件下的干预测试,即供热切断和持续加热。性能评估基于燃烧和爆炸温度、点火延迟以及环境气体成分(O2、CO、CO2)的变化。在热切割条件下,BIOVERSAL表现出优异的耐热性(~ 247,6°C),而Water提供了更长的点火延迟时间,约为82秒。在连续加热条件下,COG达到了最高爆炸温度(~ 247°C)和最长点火延迟约75秒,显著优于抑制效率最低的NOVEC 1230。综上所述,BIOVERSAL和COG是最有效的灭火剂,其中BIOVERSAL在热切割条件下表现出色,而COG在持续热暴露条件下表现最有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A NEW EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO LITHIUM-ION BATTERY FIRES IN ELECTRIC VEHICLES: INVESTIGATION OF FIRE BEHAVIOR AND EFFECTIVENESS OF EXTINGUISHING AGENTS
This study investigates fire incidents in lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles and evaluates the effectiveness of extinguishing agents under controlled conditions, highlighting the difficulty of extinguishing such fires due to the materials in the lithium-based battery components. The combustion of 18650 Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide (NMC) batteries was initiated using an overheating method in a specialized safety setup. The extinguishing agents tested include Water, BIOVERSAL, NOVEC 1230, and COG (high-viscosity liquid substance). The first phase involved a single-battery combustion test, followed by intervention tests under two conditions, which were the heat supply cut off and continuous heat application. Performance was evaluated based on combustion and explosion temperatures, ignition delay, and variations in ambient gas composition (O2, CO, CO2). Under heat-cut conditions, BIOVERSAL exhibited superior thermal resistance (∼ 247,6 °C), while Water provided a longer ignition delay of about 82 seconds. In continuous heat conditions, COG achieved the highest explosion temperature (∼ 247 °C) and longest ignition delay about 75 seconds, significantly outperforming NOVEC 1230, which showed the lowest suppression efficiency. In conclusion, BIOVERSAL and COG were the most effective extinguishing agents, with BIOVERSAL excelling under heat-cut conditions and COG proving most efficient under continuous heat exposure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
812
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Case Studies in Thermal Engineering provides a forum for the rapid publication of short, structured Case Studies in Thermal Engineering and related Short Communications. It provides an essential compendium of case studies for researchers and practitioners in the field of thermal engineering and others who are interested in aspects of thermal engineering cases that could affect other engineering processes. The journal not only publishes new and novel case studies, but also provides a forum for the publication of high quality descriptions of classic thermal engineering problems. The scope of the journal includes case studies of thermal engineering problems in components, devices and systems using existing experimental and numerical techniques in the areas of mechanical, aerospace, chemical, medical, thermal management for electronics, heat exchangers, regeneration, solar thermal energy, thermal storage, building energy conservation, and power generation. Case studies of thermal problems in other areas will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信