一个创新的框架促进了线虫指数在土壤健康评估中的实际应用

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Reza Ghaderi, Helen L. Hayden, Ramesha H. Jayaramaiah, Hang-Wei Hu, Ji-Zheng He
{"title":"一个创新的框架促进了线虫指数在土壤健康评估中的实际应用","authors":"Reza Ghaderi,&nbsp;Helen L. Hayden,&nbsp;Ramesha H. Jayaramaiah,&nbsp;Hang-Wei Hu,&nbsp;Ji-Zheng He","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nematodes are versatile bioindicators of the soil food web in both agricultural and natural ecosystems. Multiple nematode-based indices (NBIs), derived from morphological, life history and community traits, provide invaluable information on various aspects of soil health. However, a standardised approach is required to explicitly link NBIs to the soil health concept. Moreover, unifying all NBIs into a single quantitative index could offer a more comprehensive and straightforward bioindicator for soil health. The ecological foundations for individual NBIs have been well established, but a single standardised bioindicator for soil microfaunal communities including nematodes, remains absent. Here, we integrated existing knowledge on NBIs into an innovative framework for quantitatively assessing soil health and ecosystem functions. Moreover, we propose a new Nematode Soil Health (NSH) index which summarises all NBIs into a single quantitative bioindicator. The framework was tested with five case datasets covering different soil types, depths, land uses and seasonal variations. Results for Datasets 1 and 2 indicated no significant difference in NSH values among soil types (Ferrosol, Chromosol and Vertosol) but significantly greater NSH in topsoil compared to subsoil layers. Dataset 3 revealed that soil amendments with fauna significantly increased the NSH index compared to defaunated soils, supporting the role of soil faunal communities in maintaining soil health. The NSH index (in Dataset 4) was also significantly higher in perennial pastures than annual croplands and exhibited (in Dataset 5) seasonal variation, with higher values in spring compared to autumn. Although this framework requires further calibration, testing and standardisation on more nematode community datasets, it could be combined with quantitative estimations or graphical representations of NBIs to provide additional information relevant to soil health conditions. The NSH index has the potential to foster the practical application of NBIs in soil health assessment programs, enhancing their adoption by practitioners and farmers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70149","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Innovative Framework Fosters Practical Application of Nematode-Based Indices in Soil Health Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Reza Ghaderi,&nbsp;Helen L. Hayden,&nbsp;Ramesha H. Jayaramaiah,&nbsp;Hang-Wei Hu,&nbsp;Ji-Zheng He\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejss.70149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Nematodes are versatile bioindicators of the soil food web in both agricultural and natural ecosystems. Multiple nematode-based indices (NBIs), derived from morphological, life history and community traits, provide invaluable information on various aspects of soil health. However, a standardised approach is required to explicitly link NBIs to the soil health concept. Moreover, unifying all NBIs into a single quantitative index could offer a more comprehensive and straightforward bioindicator for soil health. The ecological foundations for individual NBIs have been well established, but a single standardised bioindicator for soil microfaunal communities including nematodes, remains absent. Here, we integrated existing knowledge on NBIs into an innovative framework for quantitatively assessing soil health and ecosystem functions. Moreover, we propose a new Nematode Soil Health (NSH) index which summarises all NBIs into a single quantitative bioindicator. The framework was tested with five case datasets covering different soil types, depths, land uses and seasonal variations. Results for Datasets 1 and 2 indicated no significant difference in NSH values among soil types (Ferrosol, Chromosol and Vertosol) but significantly greater NSH in topsoil compared to subsoil layers. Dataset 3 revealed that soil amendments with fauna significantly increased the NSH index compared to defaunated soils, supporting the role of soil faunal communities in maintaining soil health. The NSH index (in Dataset 4) was also significantly higher in perennial pastures than annual croplands and exhibited (in Dataset 5) seasonal variation, with higher values in spring compared to autumn. Although this framework requires further calibration, testing and standardisation on more nematode community datasets, it could be combined with quantitative estimations or graphical representations of NBIs to provide additional information relevant to soil health conditions. The NSH index has the potential to foster the practical application of NBIs in soil health assessment programs, enhancing their adoption by practitioners and farmers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"76 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70149\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70149\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70149","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

线虫是农业和自然生态系统中土壤食物网的多功能生物指标。基于形态、生活史和群落特征的多种线虫指数(nbi)提供了土壤健康各个方面的宝贵信息。然而,需要一种标准化的方法来明确地将国家基础设施指数与土壤健康概念联系起来。此外,将所有nbi统一为单一的定量指标可以为土壤健康提供更全面和直接的生物指标。单个nbi的生态学基础已经很好地建立起来,但是一个单一的标准化的土壤微动物群落生物指标,包括线虫,仍然缺乏。在这里,我们将现有的nbi知识整合到一个创新的框架中,用于定量评估土壤健康和生态系统功能。此外,我们提出了一个新的线虫土壤健康指数(NSH),它将所有的nbi总结为一个单一的定量生物指标。该框架用五个案例数据集进行了测试,这些数据集涵盖了不同的土壤类型、深度、土地利用和季节变化。数据集1和2的结果表明,不同土壤类型(Ferrosol、Chromosol和Vertosol)的NSH值无显著差异,但表层土壤的NSH值明显高于下层土壤。数据集3显示,与退化土壤相比,有动物的土壤改良显著增加了NSH指数,支持土壤动物群落在维持土壤健康中的作用。多年生牧场的NSH指数(数据集4)也显著高于一年生农田,且数据集5呈现季节变化,春季高于秋季。尽管该框架需要对更多的线虫群落数据集进行进一步校准、测试和标准化,但它可以与nbi的定量估计或图形表示相结合,以提供与土壤健康状况相关的额外信息。NSH指数有潜力促进nbi在土壤健康评估项目中的实际应用,提高从业者和农民对nbi的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Innovative Framework Fosters Practical Application of Nematode-Based Indices in Soil Health Assessment

Nematodes are versatile bioindicators of the soil food web in both agricultural and natural ecosystems. Multiple nematode-based indices (NBIs), derived from morphological, life history and community traits, provide invaluable information on various aspects of soil health. However, a standardised approach is required to explicitly link NBIs to the soil health concept. Moreover, unifying all NBIs into a single quantitative index could offer a more comprehensive and straightforward bioindicator for soil health. The ecological foundations for individual NBIs have been well established, but a single standardised bioindicator for soil microfaunal communities including nematodes, remains absent. Here, we integrated existing knowledge on NBIs into an innovative framework for quantitatively assessing soil health and ecosystem functions. Moreover, we propose a new Nematode Soil Health (NSH) index which summarises all NBIs into a single quantitative bioindicator. The framework was tested with five case datasets covering different soil types, depths, land uses and seasonal variations. Results for Datasets 1 and 2 indicated no significant difference in NSH values among soil types (Ferrosol, Chromosol and Vertosol) but significantly greater NSH in topsoil compared to subsoil layers. Dataset 3 revealed that soil amendments with fauna significantly increased the NSH index compared to defaunated soils, supporting the role of soil faunal communities in maintaining soil health. The NSH index (in Dataset 4) was also significantly higher in perennial pastures than annual croplands and exhibited (in Dataset 5) seasonal variation, with higher values in spring compared to autumn. Although this framework requires further calibration, testing and standardisation on more nematode community datasets, it could be combined with quantitative estimations or graphical representations of NBIs to provide additional information relevant to soil health conditions. The NSH index has the potential to foster the practical application of NBIs in soil health assessment programs, enhancing their adoption by practitioners and farmers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信