S. Morgan Hughey , Heather Zeidler , Kendra Stewart , Lesley Leake , Jennifer Yip , Valerie Friedmann
{"title":"推进公平的公园使用权:美国25个城市的政策扫描","authors":"S. Morgan Hughey , Heather Zeidler , Kendra Stewart , Lesley Leake , Jennifer Yip , Valerie Friedmann","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Municipal policy can address disparities in equitable access to quality parks, but currently, no tools are available to systematically identify such policies, and little research shows the prevalence and distribution of policies across cities. This research aimed to 1) validate a policy scan data collection tool, 2) describe the prevalence of park access policies by categories, and 3) analyze demographic and geographic trends in a U.S. city sample. The policy scan tool was piloted in 25 U.S. cities and captured municipal park access policies in the following categories: Parks Needs Assessment, Community Engagement, Public Funding, Shared Use Agreements, Maintenance, Land Use and Development, Connectivity, and Anti-Displacement. Specific policy mechanisms within policy categories were also defined. Key informant interviews confirmed that the policy scan tool detected park access policies (83–100 % accuracy rate). Cities most often had at least one policy in Connectivity (n = 24; 96 %), Land Use and Development (n = 21;84 %), and Public Funding (n = 18;72 %). Land Use and Development and Anti-Displacement were most commonly found in codes of ordinances, while Public Funding and Shared Use were typically identified in standalone policies, such as resolutions, executive orders, or multi-agency agreements. Cities in the West and South regions had a significantly greater number of policies compared to those in the Northeast region. This study reveals what types of policies cities across the U.S. are using to increase access to parks and green space, further highlighting the need for policy implementation and outcome research related to parks and green space access and equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 105424"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing equitable park access: a policy scan of 25 U.S. cities\",\"authors\":\"S. Morgan Hughey , Heather Zeidler , Kendra Stewart , Lesley Leake , Jennifer Yip , Valerie Friedmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Municipal policy can address disparities in equitable access to quality parks, but currently, no tools are available to systematically identify such policies, and little research shows the prevalence and distribution of policies across cities. This research aimed to 1) validate a policy scan data collection tool, 2) describe the prevalence of park access policies by categories, and 3) analyze demographic and geographic trends in a U.S. city sample. The policy scan tool was piloted in 25 U.S. cities and captured municipal park access policies in the following categories: Parks Needs Assessment, Community Engagement, Public Funding, Shared Use Agreements, Maintenance, Land Use and Development, Connectivity, and Anti-Displacement. Specific policy mechanisms within policy categories were also defined. Key informant interviews confirmed that the policy scan tool detected park access policies (83–100 % accuracy rate). Cities most often had at least one policy in Connectivity (n = 24; 96 %), Land Use and Development (n = 21;84 %), and Public Funding (n = 18;72 %). Land Use and Development and Anti-Displacement were most commonly found in codes of ordinances, while Public Funding and Shared Use were typically identified in standalone policies, such as resolutions, executive orders, or multi-agency agreements. Cities in the West and South regions had a significantly greater number of policies compared to those in the Northeast region. This study reveals what types of policies cities across the U.S. are using to increase access to parks and green space, further highlighting the need for policy implementation and outcome research related to parks and green space access and equity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape and Urban Planning\",\"volume\":\"263 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape and Urban Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204625001318\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204625001318","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advancing equitable park access: a policy scan of 25 U.S. cities
Municipal policy can address disparities in equitable access to quality parks, but currently, no tools are available to systematically identify such policies, and little research shows the prevalence and distribution of policies across cities. This research aimed to 1) validate a policy scan data collection tool, 2) describe the prevalence of park access policies by categories, and 3) analyze demographic and geographic trends in a U.S. city sample. The policy scan tool was piloted in 25 U.S. cities and captured municipal park access policies in the following categories: Parks Needs Assessment, Community Engagement, Public Funding, Shared Use Agreements, Maintenance, Land Use and Development, Connectivity, and Anti-Displacement. Specific policy mechanisms within policy categories were also defined. Key informant interviews confirmed that the policy scan tool detected park access policies (83–100 % accuracy rate). Cities most often had at least one policy in Connectivity (n = 24; 96 %), Land Use and Development (n = 21;84 %), and Public Funding (n = 18;72 %). Land Use and Development and Anti-Displacement were most commonly found in codes of ordinances, while Public Funding and Shared Use were typically identified in standalone policies, such as resolutions, executive orders, or multi-agency agreements. Cities in the West and South regions had a significantly greater number of policies compared to those in the Northeast region. This study reveals what types of policies cities across the U.S. are using to increase access to parks and green space, further highlighting the need for policy implementation and outcome research related to parks and green space access and equity.
期刊介绍:
Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.