全球棉花生产中除草剂抗性现状:趋势与展望

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Christos A. Damalas, Spyridon D. Koutroubas
{"title":"全球棉花生产中除草剂抗性现状:趋势与展望","authors":"Christos A. Damalas,&nbsp;Spyridon D. Koutroubas","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The evolution of herbicide innovations continues to deliver benefits to cotton growers, but the threat of resistant weeds with repeated application of the same active ingredients has been steadily increasing over the last 20 years. In this study, a critical overview of herbicide resistance cases in cotton production globally is reported following data retrieved from the International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database and the scholarly literature. The first case of herbicide resistance in cotton dates back to 1973, referring to trifluralin-resistant <em>Eleusine indica</em> in the United States. Since then, one hundred and nineteen (119) cases refer to resistant weeds in cotton during the period from 1973 to 2020. More than three-fourths of the resistant-weed cases (76.5 %) in cotton come from the United States. The cases increased dramatically after 2000. The most frequently reported broadleaf weeds with herbicide resistance are <em>Amaranthus palmeri</em>, <em>Amaranthus tuberculatus</em>, and <em>Xanthium strumarium</em>. The most frequently reported grasses with herbicide resistance are <em>Eleusine indica</em> and <em>Sorghum halepense</em>. Most cases of herbicide resistance refer to glyphosate (HRAC Group-9) and ALS inhibitors (HRAC Group-2), followed by microtubule assembly inhibitors (HRAC Group-3) and ACCase inhibitors (HRAC Group-1). To ensure the value of herbicides, growers must change weed control towards a more sustainable way, re-implementing an integrated approach to weed control with rotation of herbicide groups as a key principle for reducing herbicide resistance. Moreover, residual herbicides should be backed up with additional practices, such as tillage, cultivation plus chipping, and knockdown herbicides, other than glyphosate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current status of herbicide resistance in global cotton production: trends and perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Christos A. Damalas,&nbsp;Spyridon D. Koutroubas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The evolution of herbicide innovations continues to deliver benefits to cotton growers, but the threat of resistant weeds with repeated application of the same active ingredients has been steadily increasing over the last 20 years. In this study, a critical overview of herbicide resistance cases in cotton production globally is reported following data retrieved from the International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database and the scholarly literature. The first case of herbicide resistance in cotton dates back to 1973, referring to trifluralin-resistant <em>Eleusine indica</em> in the United States. Since then, one hundred and nineteen (119) cases refer to resistant weeds in cotton during the period from 1973 to 2020. More than three-fourths of the resistant-weed cases (76.5 %) in cotton come from the United States. The cases increased dramatically after 2000. The most frequently reported broadleaf weeds with herbicide resistance are <em>Amaranthus palmeri</em>, <em>Amaranthus tuberculatus</em>, and <em>Xanthium strumarium</em>. The most frequently reported grasses with herbicide resistance are <em>Eleusine indica</em> and <em>Sorghum halepense</em>. Most cases of herbicide resistance refer to glyphosate (HRAC Group-9) and ALS inhibitors (HRAC Group-2), followed by microtubule assembly inhibitors (HRAC Group-3) and ACCase inhibitors (HRAC Group-1). To ensure the value of herbicides, growers must change weed control towards a more sustainable way, re-implementing an integrated approach to weed control with rotation of herbicide groups as a key principle for reducing herbicide resistance. Moreover, residual herbicides should be backed up with additional practices, such as tillage, cultivation plus chipping, and knockdown herbicides, other than glyphosate.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Protection\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002121\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

除草剂创新的发展继续为棉花种植者带来好处,但在过去的20年里,反复使用相同活性成分的抗性杂草的威胁一直在稳步增加。在本研究中,根据从国际抗除草剂杂草数据库和学术文献中检索的数据,报告了全球棉花生产中除草剂抗性病例的关键概述。棉花抗除草剂的第一个案例可以追溯到1973年,指的是美国的抗三氟拉灵的伊莲。从那以后,从1973年到2020年,119例是指棉花中的抗性杂草。超过四分之三的棉花抗性杂草病例(76.5%)来自美国。2000年以后病例急剧增加。最常报道的具有除草剂抗性的阔叶杂草是棕苋菜(Amaranthus palmeri)、结核苋菜(Amaranthus tuberculatus)和苍耳(Xanthium strumarium)。报道最多的抗除草剂禾草是籼稻和高粱。除草剂抗性以草甘膦(HRAC Group-9)和ALS抑制剂(HRAC Group-2)最多,其次是微管组装抑制剂(HRAC Group-3)和ACCase抑制剂(HRAC Group-1)。为了确保除草剂的价值,种植者必须将杂草控制转向更可持续的方式,重新实施综合的杂草控制方法,并将除草剂组的轮作作为降低除草剂抗性的关键原则。此外,残留除草剂应辅以额外的做法,如耕作、种植加切碎、击倒除草甘膦以外的除草剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current status of herbicide resistance in global cotton production: trends and perspectives
The evolution of herbicide innovations continues to deliver benefits to cotton growers, but the threat of resistant weeds with repeated application of the same active ingredients has been steadily increasing over the last 20 years. In this study, a critical overview of herbicide resistance cases in cotton production globally is reported following data retrieved from the International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database and the scholarly literature. The first case of herbicide resistance in cotton dates back to 1973, referring to trifluralin-resistant Eleusine indica in the United States. Since then, one hundred and nineteen (119) cases refer to resistant weeds in cotton during the period from 1973 to 2020. More than three-fourths of the resistant-weed cases (76.5 %) in cotton come from the United States. The cases increased dramatically after 2000. The most frequently reported broadleaf weeds with herbicide resistance are Amaranthus palmeri, Amaranthus tuberculatus, and Xanthium strumarium. The most frequently reported grasses with herbicide resistance are Eleusine indica and Sorghum halepense. Most cases of herbicide resistance refer to glyphosate (HRAC Group-9) and ALS inhibitors (HRAC Group-2), followed by microtubule assembly inhibitors (HRAC Group-3) and ACCase inhibitors (HRAC Group-1). To ensure the value of herbicides, growers must change weed control towards a more sustainable way, re-implementing an integrated approach to weed control with rotation of herbicide groups as a key principle for reducing herbicide resistance. Moreover, residual herbicides should be backed up with additional practices, such as tillage, cultivation plus chipping, and knockdown herbicides, other than glyphosate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crop Protection
Crop Protection 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics: -Abiotic damage- Agronomic control methods- Assessment of pest and disease damage- Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases- Biological control- Biorational pesticides- Control of animal pests of world crops- Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms- Control of weeds and integrated management- Economic considerations- Effects of plant growth regulators- Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use- Environmental effects of pesticides- Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control- GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications- Importance and control of postharvest crop losses- Integrated control- Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies- Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection- Pesticide application methods- Pest management- Phytobiomes for pest and disease control- Resistance management- Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信