Loyiso V. Dunga , Kerry J. Sink , Megan G. Van der Bank , Linda R. Harris , Lara Van Niekerk , Myriam Perschke , Ruan Brand , Judy Mann-Lang , Mike Bruton , Mia Strand , Nina Rivers , Stephen Lamberth , Harriet Clift , Bernadette Snow , Edward Knott , Kira Gee
{"title":"为南非沿海环境的空间规划和管理试行具有重要文化意义的地区框架","authors":"Loyiso V. Dunga , Kerry J. Sink , Megan G. Van der Bank , Linda R. Harris , Lara Van Niekerk , Myriam Perschke , Ruan Brand , Judy Mann-Lang , Mike Bruton , Mia Strand , Nina Rivers , Stephen Lamberth , Harriet Clift , Bernadette Snow , Edward Knott , Kira Gee","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The identification and mapping of culturally significant areas are key inputs to Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) and the design and implementation of protected and conserved areas or other place-based management measures. Despite the recognised importance of coastal and marine cultural values, they are often missing from MSP processes and management measures, leading to mistrust, biased trade-offs, and inequitable management outcomes, undermining cultural ecosystem benefits, ecosystem services and the people who rely upon them. There are few African examples where cultural heritage has been considered in coastal and marine spatial planning and management. This study pilots an existing Culturally Significant Areas (CSA) framework in a South African context to demonstrate proof of concept in a new setting and contributes to progress in identifying and including cultural heritage and values in MSP and coastal management. We identified eight categories of CSA, drawing from literature, orature and expert knowledge. These included tangible and intangible aspects of cultural heritage, including iconic seascapes, traditional fishing grounds, sites of spiritual and ceremonial importance and oral tradition. We assessed a range of sites (4−14) per category for relative importance at a national scale based on five established CSA criteria: 1) cultural uniqueness, 2) broad cultural reliance, 3) degree of tradition, 4) importance to the resilience of the social-ecological system, and 5) impact of dramatic cultural change. This facilitated national-scale mapping of a preliminary set of 60 CSA. Challenges included nation-wide participation, conceptual difficulties and terminology, spatialisation of intangible heritage, scale and implementation challenges. Key enabling factors and recommendations are distilled and discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 106807"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Piloting a culturally significant areas framework for spatial planning and management in the coastal environment of South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Loyiso V. Dunga , Kerry J. Sink , Megan G. Van der Bank , Linda R. Harris , Lara Van Niekerk , Myriam Perschke , Ruan Brand , Judy Mann-Lang , Mike Bruton , Mia Strand , Nina Rivers , Stephen Lamberth , Harriet Clift , Bernadette Snow , Edward Knott , Kira Gee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The identification and mapping of culturally significant areas are key inputs to Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) and the design and implementation of protected and conserved areas or other place-based management measures. Despite the recognised importance of coastal and marine cultural values, they are often missing from MSP processes and management measures, leading to mistrust, biased trade-offs, and inequitable management outcomes, undermining cultural ecosystem benefits, ecosystem services and the people who rely upon them. There are few African examples where cultural heritage has been considered in coastal and marine spatial planning and management. This study pilots an existing Culturally Significant Areas (CSA) framework in a South African context to demonstrate proof of concept in a new setting and contributes to progress in identifying and including cultural heritage and values in MSP and coastal management. We identified eight categories of CSA, drawing from literature, orature and expert knowledge. These included tangible and intangible aspects of cultural heritage, including iconic seascapes, traditional fishing grounds, sites of spiritual and ceremonial importance and oral tradition. We assessed a range of sites (4−14) per category for relative importance at a national scale based on five established CSA criteria: 1) cultural uniqueness, 2) broad cultural reliance, 3) degree of tradition, 4) importance to the resilience of the social-ecological system, and 5) impact of dramatic cultural change. This facilitated national-scale mapping of a preliminary set of 60 CSA. Challenges included nation-wide participation, conceptual difficulties and terminology, spatialisation of intangible heritage, scale and implementation challenges. Key enabling factors and recommendations are distilled and discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":\"180 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106807\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25002222\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25002222","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Piloting a culturally significant areas framework for spatial planning and management in the coastal environment of South Africa
The identification and mapping of culturally significant areas are key inputs to Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) and the design and implementation of protected and conserved areas or other place-based management measures. Despite the recognised importance of coastal and marine cultural values, they are often missing from MSP processes and management measures, leading to mistrust, biased trade-offs, and inequitable management outcomes, undermining cultural ecosystem benefits, ecosystem services and the people who rely upon them. There are few African examples where cultural heritage has been considered in coastal and marine spatial planning and management. This study pilots an existing Culturally Significant Areas (CSA) framework in a South African context to demonstrate proof of concept in a new setting and contributes to progress in identifying and including cultural heritage and values in MSP and coastal management. We identified eight categories of CSA, drawing from literature, orature and expert knowledge. These included tangible and intangible aspects of cultural heritage, including iconic seascapes, traditional fishing grounds, sites of spiritual and ceremonial importance and oral tradition. We assessed a range of sites (4−14) per category for relative importance at a national scale based on five established CSA criteria: 1) cultural uniqueness, 2) broad cultural reliance, 3) degree of tradition, 4) importance to the resilience of the social-ecological system, and 5) impact of dramatic cultural change. This facilitated national-scale mapping of a preliminary set of 60 CSA. Challenges included nation-wide participation, conceptual difficulties and terminology, spatialisation of intangible heritage, scale and implementation challenges. Key enabling factors and recommendations are distilled and discussed.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.