Moslem Daliri , Ali Salarpouri , Siamak Behzadi , Saud M. Al Jufaili , Saeid Gorgin , Elyas Soleimani , Danial Ghaderi , Mohammad Momeni
{"title":"在波斯湾实施有效的临时捕鱼禁令","authors":"Moslem Daliri , Ali Salarpouri , Siamak Behzadi , Saud M. Al Jufaili , Saeid Gorgin , Elyas Soleimani , Danial Ghaderi , Mohammad Momeni","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Implementing a fishing ban, which prohibits all fishing activities, is a significant fisheries measure aimed at reducing fishing pressure and restoring depleted fish populations. Overfishing, along with climate change, poses a serious threat to fish biodiversity and the livelihoods of fishers in the Persian Gulf, particularly in Iran. This study employed a bottom-up approach to facilitate consensus-building between the fishing communities in southern Iran and governmental authorities, ultimately leading to the adoption of an extended fishing ban in the northern Persian Gulf. To achieve this objective, an initial survey was conducted by distributiing and collectiing 652 questionnaires to evaluate the perceptions of key stakeholder groups— including fishers, officials from the Iranian Fisheries Organization (IFO) and the Iranian Department of Environment (IDE), as well as scientific experts— regarding current levels of fishing mortality in the region. Subsequently, the optimal timing for enforcing a fishing ban was assessed by computing the Fishing Ban Score (FBS) index. The FBS values were calculated by multiplying three componetns: the monthly ovarian development percentages of 40 commercially important or dominant fish species in the catch (including 32 teleosts, 5 crustaceans, 2 sharks, and 1 cephalopod), the weighted importance of each species to fisheries, and the current status of the fish stocks. The results revealed that while most fishermen expressed concerns about weak fisheries co-management, they were equally apprehensive about the ongoing exploitation of fish in the region. Spring—particularly May, with an FBS of 38.20—was identified as the optimal time for implementing the fishing ban. Finally, a stakeholder meeting was convened, during which participants discussed the findings and ultimately reached a consensus to implement an annual fishing ban commencing in May. Given the transboundary nature of fish stocks in the Persian Gulf, it is recommended that neighboring countries collaborate with Iran in adopting a coordinated and more effective fishing ban across the region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 106813"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward an effective temporary fishing ban law enforcement in the Persian Gulf\",\"authors\":\"Moslem Daliri , Ali Salarpouri , Siamak Behzadi , Saud M. Al Jufaili , Saeid Gorgin , Elyas Soleimani , Danial Ghaderi , Mohammad Momeni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Implementing a fishing ban, which prohibits all fishing activities, is a significant fisheries measure aimed at reducing fishing pressure and restoring depleted fish populations. Overfishing, along with climate change, poses a serious threat to fish biodiversity and the livelihoods of fishers in the Persian Gulf, particularly in Iran. This study employed a bottom-up approach to facilitate consensus-building between the fishing communities in southern Iran and governmental authorities, ultimately leading to the adoption of an extended fishing ban in the northern Persian Gulf. To achieve this objective, an initial survey was conducted by distributiing and collectiing 652 questionnaires to evaluate the perceptions of key stakeholder groups— including fishers, officials from the Iranian Fisheries Organization (IFO) and the Iranian Department of Environment (IDE), as well as scientific experts— regarding current levels of fishing mortality in the region. Subsequently, the optimal timing for enforcing a fishing ban was assessed by computing the Fishing Ban Score (FBS) index. The FBS values were calculated by multiplying three componetns: the monthly ovarian development percentages of 40 commercially important or dominant fish species in the catch (including 32 teleosts, 5 crustaceans, 2 sharks, and 1 cephalopod), the weighted importance of each species to fisheries, and the current status of the fish stocks. The results revealed that while most fishermen expressed concerns about weak fisheries co-management, they were equally apprehensive about the ongoing exploitation of fish in the region. Spring—particularly May, with an FBS of 38.20—was identified as the optimal time for implementing the fishing ban. Finally, a stakeholder meeting was convened, during which participants discussed the findings and ultimately reached a consensus to implement an annual fishing ban commencing in May. Given the transboundary nature of fish stocks in the Persian Gulf, it is recommended that neighboring countries collaborate with Iran in adopting a coordinated and more effective fishing ban across the region.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":\"180 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106813\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25002283\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25002283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Toward an effective temporary fishing ban law enforcement in the Persian Gulf
Implementing a fishing ban, which prohibits all fishing activities, is a significant fisheries measure aimed at reducing fishing pressure and restoring depleted fish populations. Overfishing, along with climate change, poses a serious threat to fish biodiversity and the livelihoods of fishers in the Persian Gulf, particularly in Iran. This study employed a bottom-up approach to facilitate consensus-building between the fishing communities in southern Iran and governmental authorities, ultimately leading to the adoption of an extended fishing ban in the northern Persian Gulf. To achieve this objective, an initial survey was conducted by distributiing and collectiing 652 questionnaires to evaluate the perceptions of key stakeholder groups— including fishers, officials from the Iranian Fisheries Organization (IFO) and the Iranian Department of Environment (IDE), as well as scientific experts— regarding current levels of fishing mortality in the region. Subsequently, the optimal timing for enforcing a fishing ban was assessed by computing the Fishing Ban Score (FBS) index. The FBS values were calculated by multiplying three componetns: the monthly ovarian development percentages of 40 commercially important or dominant fish species in the catch (including 32 teleosts, 5 crustaceans, 2 sharks, and 1 cephalopod), the weighted importance of each species to fisheries, and the current status of the fish stocks. The results revealed that while most fishermen expressed concerns about weak fisheries co-management, they were equally apprehensive about the ongoing exploitation of fish in the region. Spring—particularly May, with an FBS of 38.20—was identified as the optimal time for implementing the fishing ban. Finally, a stakeholder meeting was convened, during which participants discussed the findings and ultimately reached a consensus to implement an annual fishing ban commencing in May. Given the transboundary nature of fish stocks in the Persian Gulf, it is recommended that neighboring countries collaborate with Iran in adopting a coordinated and more effective fishing ban across the region.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.