运输从业员的远景规划

IF 3.9 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Glenn Lyons , Charlene Rohr , Annette Smith , Anna Rothnie , Janice Jaison , Andrew Curry
{"title":"运输从业员的远景规划","authors":"Glenn Lyons ,&nbsp;Charlene Rohr ,&nbsp;Annette Smith ,&nbsp;Anna Rothnie ,&nbsp;Janice Jaison ,&nbsp;Andrew Curry","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With increasing transport sector interest in vision-led rather than forecast-led planning, there is a growing need to think about what a good vision looks like, how a vision can be created, who should be involved in creating a vision, and, ultimately, what value a vision subsequently has. In the field of foresight and scenario planning, futures can be categorised as one of three types: probable, possible, and preferred. Preferred futures, or visions, characterise what we choose to work towards. They involve clarity around values, with the evident implication that values can be contested. The paper draws upon existing literature alongside the experience of the authors to examine considerations in the development of visions – as part of the vision-led approach to transport planning. It is framed by a set of ten guiding questions that, when taken in sequence, help to chart a course through the process of developing a vision (so-called ‘visioning’). The interdependent nature of the questions within the set is also highlighted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 101483"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visioning for transport practitioners\",\"authors\":\"Glenn Lyons ,&nbsp;Charlene Rohr ,&nbsp;Annette Smith ,&nbsp;Anna Rothnie ,&nbsp;Janice Jaison ,&nbsp;Andrew Curry\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With increasing transport sector interest in vision-led rather than forecast-led planning, there is a growing need to think about what a good vision looks like, how a vision can be created, who should be involved in creating a vision, and, ultimately, what value a vision subsequently has. In the field of foresight and scenario planning, futures can be categorised as one of three types: probable, possible, and preferred. Preferred futures, or visions, characterise what we choose to work towards. They involve clarity around values, with the evident implication that values can be contested. The paper draws upon existing literature alongside the experience of the authors to examine considerations in the development of visions – as part of the vision-led approach to transport planning. It is framed by a set of ten guiding questions that, when taken in sequence, help to chart a course through the process of developing a vision (so-called ‘visioning’). The interdependent nature of the questions within the set is also highlighted.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225001629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225001629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着运输部门越来越关注以愿景为导向而不是以预测为导向的规划,人们越来越需要思考一个好的愿景是什么样子的,如何创造一个愿景,谁应该参与创造一个愿景,以及最终,一个愿景随后具有什么价值。在预见和情景规划领域,未来可以分为三种类型:可能的、可能的和首选的。偏好的未来,或愿景,是我们选择为之努力的特征。它们涉及价值观的清晰性,并明显暗示价值观是可以被质疑的。本文利用现有文献以及作者的经验来研究愿景发展中的考虑因素-作为愿景主导的交通规划方法的一部分。它由10个指导性问题组成,如果按顺序回答这些问题,就有助于在制定愿景的过程中制定路线(所谓的“愿景”)。这组问题的相互依存性质也被强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Visioning for transport practitioners
With increasing transport sector interest in vision-led rather than forecast-led planning, there is a growing need to think about what a good vision looks like, how a vision can be created, who should be involved in creating a vision, and, ultimately, what value a vision subsequently has. In the field of foresight and scenario planning, futures can be categorised as one of three types: probable, possible, and preferred. Preferred futures, or visions, characterise what we choose to work towards. They involve clarity around values, with the evident implication that values can be contested. The paper draws upon existing literature alongside the experience of the authors to examine considerations in the development of visions – as part of the vision-led approach to transport planning. It is framed by a set of ten guiding questions that, when taken in sequence, help to chart a course through the process of developing a vision (so-called ‘visioning’). The interdependent nature of the questions within the set is also highlighted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信