对调查教师通常接受的专业发展影响的研究进行批判性回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jannika Lindvall , Nils Kirsten , Andreas Ryve , Jan-Eric Gustafsson
{"title":"对调查教师通常接受的专业发展影响的研究进行批判性回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Jannika Lindvall ,&nbsp;Nils Kirsten ,&nbsp;Andreas Ryve ,&nbsp;Jan-Eric Gustafsson","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this review, we map and summarize studies examining the effects of teachers’ participation in professional development (PD) on teaching practices and student achievement based on nationally representative datasets, reflecting both the teacher population and the PD they typically receive. We also critically assess the statistical approaches used in these studies to evaluate the credibility and robustness of their findings. The reviewed studies demonstrate that large-scale datasets (e.g., TIMSS and NAEP) offer valuable opportunities to study PD in representative settings. However, only a minority of the studies adequately address the methodological challenges associated with these datasets. As a result, while our meta-analysis indicates that PD participation correlates with teaching practices and student achievement, we caution against interpreting these results as causal due to methodological limitations in most of the reviewed studies. Finally, we propose strategies for future research to produce more credible results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 101482"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critical review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the effects of the professional development teachers typically receive\",\"authors\":\"Jannika Lindvall ,&nbsp;Nils Kirsten ,&nbsp;Andreas Ryve ,&nbsp;Jan-Eric Gustafsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this review, we map and summarize studies examining the effects of teachers’ participation in professional development (PD) on teaching practices and student achievement based on nationally representative datasets, reflecting both the teacher population and the PD they typically receive. We also critically assess the statistical approaches used in these studies to evaluate the credibility and robustness of their findings. The reviewed studies demonstrate that large-scale datasets (e.g., TIMSS and NAEP) offer valuable opportunities to study PD in representative settings. However, only a minority of the studies adequately address the methodological challenges associated with these datasets. As a result, while our meta-analysis indicates that PD participation correlates with teaching practices and student achievement, we caution against interpreting these results as causal due to methodological limitations in most of the reviewed studies. Finally, we propose strategies for future research to produce more credible results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101482\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000392\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇综述中,我们绘制并总结了基于全国代表性数据集的研究,这些数据集反映了教师群体和他们通常接受的专业发展(PD),研究了教师参与专业发展对教学实践和学生成绩的影响。我们还批判性地评估了这些研究中使用的统计方法,以评估其研究结果的可信度和稳健性。综述的研究表明,大规模数据集(例如TIMSS和NAEP)为代表性环境中的PD研究提供了宝贵的机会。然而,只有少数研究充分解决了与这些数据集相关的方法挑战。因此,虽然我们的荟萃分析表明PD参与与教学实践和学生成绩相关,但由于大多数回顾研究的方法局限性,我们警告不要将这些结果解释为因果关系。最后,我们提出了未来研究的策略,以产生更可信的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A critical review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the effects of the professional development teachers typically receive
In this review, we map and summarize studies examining the effects of teachers’ participation in professional development (PD) on teaching practices and student achievement based on nationally representative datasets, reflecting both the teacher population and the PD they typically receive. We also critically assess the statistical approaches used in these studies to evaluate the credibility and robustness of their findings. The reviewed studies demonstrate that large-scale datasets (e.g., TIMSS and NAEP) offer valuable opportunities to study PD in representative settings. However, only a minority of the studies adequately address the methodological challenges associated with these datasets. As a result, while our meta-analysis indicates that PD participation correlates with teaching practices and student achievement, we caution against interpreting these results as causal due to methodological limitations in most of the reviewed studies. Finally, we propose strategies for future research to produce more credible results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信