{"title":"青少年邻里机会、认知功能和大脑结构的关系","authors":"Lan Zhou , Tianying Cai , Ka I Ip","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Access to essential neighborhood opportunities (e.g., quality education, nutritious foods, clean air) is critical for development, but the influence of these factors on neurocognition remains unclear. Leveraging the ABCD (Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development) Study, we examined associations between neighborhood opportunity, cognitive function, and brain structure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were 10,463 (ages 9–10 years) children. Neighborhood opportunity was measured by the Child Opportunity Index (COI 2.0), which assesses educational, health/environmental, and social/economic opportunities. Cognitive function was measured via the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery, and T1-weighted imaging provided brain structural measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Youths living in higher-opportunity neighborhoods exhibited better performance across all cognitive measures (β = 0.11–0.37, <em>p</em> < .001) and larger whole-brain gray matter volume (β = 0.10, <em>p</em> < .001), surface area (β = 0.06, <em>p</em> < .001), cortical thickness (β = 0.11, <em>p</em> < .001), and specific brain volume regions implicated in cognitive function. These associations persisted after controlling for demographic and household factors (e.g., material hardship, family conflict, and parental education). Relative weight analyses revealed that socioeconomic neighborhood opportunities had the strongest influence on cognitive function (33.35%–51.56%) and brain measures (48.95%–60.98%), although educational and health/environmental opportunities also contributed uniquely. Structural equation modeling found that whole-brain gray matter volume and surface area mediated the relationship between COI and cognitive outcomes at the 2-year follow-up, with regional effects in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Neighborhood opportunity is a critical factor that shapes neurocognitive development, beyond effects of household-level indicators and neighborhood deprivation. The findings highlight the importance of using an asset-based approach to understand how multiple neighborhood resources may foster neurocognitive development and advance health equity for youth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72373,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry global open science","volume":"5 5","pages":"Article 100533"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Neighborhood Opportunity, Cognitive Function, and Brain Structure in Youths\",\"authors\":\"Lan Zhou , Tianying Cai , Ka I Ip\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Access to essential neighborhood opportunities (e.g., quality education, nutritious foods, clean air) is critical for development, but the influence of these factors on neurocognition remains unclear. Leveraging the ABCD (Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development) Study, we examined associations between neighborhood opportunity, cognitive function, and brain structure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were 10,463 (ages 9–10 years) children. Neighborhood opportunity was measured by the Child Opportunity Index (COI 2.0), which assesses educational, health/environmental, and social/economic opportunities. Cognitive function was measured via the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery, and T1-weighted imaging provided brain structural measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Youths living in higher-opportunity neighborhoods exhibited better performance across all cognitive measures (β = 0.11–0.37, <em>p</em> < .001) and larger whole-brain gray matter volume (β = 0.10, <em>p</em> < .001), surface area (β = 0.06, <em>p</em> < .001), cortical thickness (β = 0.11, <em>p</em> < .001), and specific brain volume regions implicated in cognitive function. These associations persisted after controlling for demographic and household factors (e.g., material hardship, family conflict, and parental education). Relative weight analyses revealed that socioeconomic neighborhood opportunities had the strongest influence on cognitive function (33.35%–51.56%) and brain measures (48.95%–60.98%), although educational and health/environmental opportunities also contributed uniquely. Structural equation modeling found that whole-brain gray matter volume and surface area mediated the relationship between COI and cognitive outcomes at the 2-year follow-up, with regional effects in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Neighborhood opportunity is a critical factor that shapes neurocognitive development, beyond effects of household-level indicators and neighborhood deprivation. The findings highlight the importance of using an asset-based approach to understand how multiple neighborhood resources may foster neurocognitive development and advance health equity for youth.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological psychiatry global open science\",\"volume\":\"5 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 100533\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological psychiatry global open science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174325000874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry global open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174325000874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
获得基本的社区机会(如优质教育、营养食物、清洁空气)对发展至关重要,但这些因素对神经认知的影响尚不清楚。利用ABCD(青少年大脑认知发展)研究,我们研究了邻里机会、认知功能和大脑结构之间的关系。方法研究对象为10463名儿童(9-10岁)。社区机会由儿童机会指数(coi2.0)衡量,该指数评估教育、健康/环境和社会/经济机会。认知功能通过NIH工具箱认知电池测量,t1加权成像提供脑结构测量。结果生活在高机会社区的青少年在所有认知测试中表现更好(β = 0.11-0.37, p <;.001),全脑灰质体积增大(β = 0.10, p <;.001),表面积(β = 0.06, p <;.001),皮质厚度(β = 0.11, p <;.001),以及与认知功能相关的特定脑容量区域。在控制了人口统计和家庭因素(如物质困难、家庭冲突和父母教育)后,这些关联仍然存在。相对权重分析显示,社会经济邻里机会对认知功能(33.35% ~ 51.56%)和大脑测量(48.95% ~ 60.98%)的影响最大,尽管教育和健康/环境机会也有独特的影响。结构方程模型发现,在2年随访中,全脑灰质体积和表面积介导了COI与认知结果之间的关系,在背外侧前额叶皮层和前扣带皮层中存在区域效应。结论邻里机会是影响神经认知发展的重要因素,超越了家庭指标和邻里剥夺的影响。研究结果强调了使用基于资产的方法来了解多种社区资源如何促进神经认知发展和促进青少年健康公平的重要性。
Association Between Neighborhood Opportunity, Cognitive Function, and Brain Structure in Youths
Background
Access to essential neighborhood opportunities (e.g., quality education, nutritious foods, clean air) is critical for development, but the influence of these factors on neurocognition remains unclear. Leveraging the ABCD (Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development) Study, we examined associations between neighborhood opportunity, cognitive function, and brain structure.
Methods
Participants were 10,463 (ages 9–10 years) children. Neighborhood opportunity was measured by the Child Opportunity Index (COI 2.0), which assesses educational, health/environmental, and social/economic opportunities. Cognitive function was measured via the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery, and T1-weighted imaging provided brain structural measures.
Results
Youths living in higher-opportunity neighborhoods exhibited better performance across all cognitive measures (β = 0.11–0.37, p < .001) and larger whole-brain gray matter volume (β = 0.10, p < .001), surface area (β = 0.06, p < .001), cortical thickness (β = 0.11, p < .001), and specific brain volume regions implicated in cognitive function. These associations persisted after controlling for demographic and household factors (e.g., material hardship, family conflict, and parental education). Relative weight analyses revealed that socioeconomic neighborhood opportunities had the strongest influence on cognitive function (33.35%–51.56%) and brain measures (48.95%–60.98%), although educational and health/environmental opportunities also contributed uniquely. Structural equation modeling found that whole-brain gray matter volume and surface area mediated the relationship between COI and cognitive outcomes at the 2-year follow-up, with regional effects in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex.
Conclusions
Neighborhood opportunity is a critical factor that shapes neurocognitive development, beyond effects of household-level indicators and neighborhood deprivation. The findings highlight the importance of using an asset-based approach to understand how multiple neighborhood resources may foster neurocognitive development and advance health equity for youth.