Alannah C. Brett , Elizabeth A. Holley , Raphael Deberdt , Lukas Fahle , Nicole M. Smith
{"title":"美国锂生产:社会技术评价、环境影响和社会接受度","authors":"Alannah C. Brett , Elizabeth A. Holley , Raphael Deberdt , Lukas Fahle , Nicole M. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The low-carbon transition has motivated a global exploration and development surge for lithium (Li). The United States has only one Li mine and commercial refinery, and one Li-byproduct producer in 2024. Projects from exploration to production are classified in four production types: hard-rock mining of Li pegmatites, soft-rock mining of Li clays and sediments, and solution mining of Li brines through evaporative concentration or direct lithium extraction (DLE). This contribution reviews all major U.S. lithium projects to total known (mid 2024) reserves of 0.71 Mt and resources of 27.8 Mt (million metric tonnes contained lithium). Upon this foundation, the political ecology of Li development is analyzed, focused on interconnected environmental impacts and social perceptions. Lithium pegmatite deposits (12 % of reserves; 2 % of resources) have seen open pit mining proposals raise concerns over water quality and landscape disruption. From Li clays and sediments (71 % of reserves; 74 % of resources) controversies have developed over Tribal cultural resources and potential impacts on desert playa ecosystems. Salar-type brines (10 % of reserves; 1 % of resources) supply the sole Li mine through evaporative concentration. High water usage in this method has led to research and development of DLE methods that may enable lithium recovery from geothermal brines and oilfield brines (11 % and 6 % of resources respectively). A summary conceptual diagram of the lithium landscape, highlights interconnected global, domestic, and site-specific factors necessary for responsible U.S. lithium production. This work illuminates how resource availability, technology, and social dynamics converge to shape the outcomes of lithium development and U.S. supply security.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 105599"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lithium production in the United States: Socio-technical review of sites, environmental impacts, and social acceptance\",\"authors\":\"Alannah C. Brett , Elizabeth A. Holley , Raphael Deberdt , Lukas Fahle , Nicole M. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The low-carbon transition has motivated a global exploration and development surge for lithium (Li). The United States has only one Li mine and commercial refinery, and one Li-byproduct producer in 2024. Projects from exploration to production are classified in four production types: hard-rock mining of Li pegmatites, soft-rock mining of Li clays and sediments, and solution mining of Li brines through evaporative concentration or direct lithium extraction (DLE). This contribution reviews all major U.S. lithium projects to total known (mid 2024) reserves of 0.71 Mt and resources of 27.8 Mt (million metric tonnes contained lithium). Upon this foundation, the political ecology of Li development is analyzed, focused on interconnected environmental impacts and social perceptions. Lithium pegmatite deposits (12 % of reserves; 2 % of resources) have seen open pit mining proposals raise concerns over water quality and landscape disruption. From Li clays and sediments (71 % of reserves; 74 % of resources) controversies have developed over Tribal cultural resources and potential impacts on desert playa ecosystems. Salar-type brines (10 % of reserves; 1 % of resources) supply the sole Li mine through evaporative concentration. High water usage in this method has led to research and development of DLE methods that may enable lithium recovery from geothermal brines and oilfield brines (11 % and 6 % of resources respectively). A summary conceptual diagram of the lithium landscape, highlights interconnected global, domestic, and site-specific factors necessary for responsible U.S. lithium production. This work illuminates how resource availability, technology, and social dynamics converge to shape the outcomes of lithium development and U.S. supply security.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105599\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725001412\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725001412","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lithium production in the United States: Socio-technical review of sites, environmental impacts, and social acceptance
The low-carbon transition has motivated a global exploration and development surge for lithium (Li). The United States has only one Li mine and commercial refinery, and one Li-byproduct producer in 2024. Projects from exploration to production are classified in four production types: hard-rock mining of Li pegmatites, soft-rock mining of Li clays and sediments, and solution mining of Li brines through evaporative concentration or direct lithium extraction (DLE). This contribution reviews all major U.S. lithium projects to total known (mid 2024) reserves of 0.71 Mt and resources of 27.8 Mt (million metric tonnes contained lithium). Upon this foundation, the political ecology of Li development is analyzed, focused on interconnected environmental impacts and social perceptions. Lithium pegmatite deposits (12 % of reserves; 2 % of resources) have seen open pit mining proposals raise concerns over water quality and landscape disruption. From Li clays and sediments (71 % of reserves; 74 % of resources) controversies have developed over Tribal cultural resources and potential impacts on desert playa ecosystems. Salar-type brines (10 % of reserves; 1 % of resources) supply the sole Li mine through evaporative concentration. High water usage in this method has led to research and development of DLE methods that may enable lithium recovery from geothermal brines and oilfield brines (11 % and 6 % of resources respectively). A summary conceptual diagram of the lithium landscape, highlights interconnected global, domestic, and site-specific factors necessary for responsible U.S. lithium production. This work illuminates how resource availability, technology, and social dynamics converge to shape the outcomes of lithium development and U.S. supply security.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.