Brian Hitsman , Michael D’Eletto , Jacqueline K. Gollan , Robert A. Schnoll , George D. Papandonatos
{"title":"用伐尼克兰和强化行为治疗后,当前或过去患有重度抑郁症的个体戒烟的基线预测因素","authors":"Brian Hitsman , Michael D’Eletto , Jacqueline K. Gollan , Robert A. Schnoll , George D. Papandonatos","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In a 2 × 2 factorial clinical trial with 300 individuals with current or past major depressive disorder (MDD), varenicline significantly increased smoking cessation, compared to placebo, whereas behavioral activation for smoking cessation yielded similar quit rates compared to standard behavioral treatment. In this secondary analysis, we evaluated whether participant characteristics at baseline predicted abstinence or moderated the effects of behavioral treatment or pharmacotherapy on abstinence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The sample was racially and socioeconomically diverse and spanned varied psychiatric presentations: 49 % of participants had current MDD, 44 % had other mental health disorders, and only 27 % were being treated for their depression. Self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence at end-of-treatment (EOT; Week 14) and long-term follow-up (Week 27) was confirmed using breath carbon monoxide (≤6 parts per million). <em>Results</em>: In a logistic regression model, greater likelihood of abstinence at EOT was associated with varenicline vs. placebo (OR=5.52, 95 % CI=2.62–11.60), lower cigarette dependence (OR=0.42, 95 % CI=0.19–0.90), and fast nicotine metabolism (OR=1.64, 95 % CI=1.06–2.54). In second logistic regression model, greater likelihood of Week 27 abstinence was associated with varenicline vs placebo (OR=3.06, 95 % CI=1.32–7.07) and fast nicotine metabolism (OR=2.06, 95 % CI=1.20–3.54). None of the baseline factors interacted with behavioral or pharmacological treatment to predict abstinence at either time point.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Varenicline should be a primary treatment consideration for individuals with MDD. Stable psychiatric status is not required for favorable treatment outcome. Further effort is needed to identify behavioral interventions that can be added to varenicline to improve quit rates for individuals with MDD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":"274 ","pages":"Article 112761"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Baseline predictors of smoking cessation among individuals with current or past major depressive disorder following treatment with varenicline and intensive behavioral treatment\",\"authors\":\"Brian Hitsman , Michael D’Eletto , Jacqueline K. Gollan , Robert A. Schnoll , George D. Papandonatos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In a 2 × 2 factorial clinical trial with 300 individuals with current or past major depressive disorder (MDD), varenicline significantly increased smoking cessation, compared to placebo, whereas behavioral activation for smoking cessation yielded similar quit rates compared to standard behavioral treatment. In this secondary analysis, we evaluated whether participant characteristics at baseline predicted abstinence or moderated the effects of behavioral treatment or pharmacotherapy on abstinence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The sample was racially and socioeconomically diverse and spanned varied psychiatric presentations: 49 % of participants had current MDD, 44 % had other mental health disorders, and only 27 % were being treated for their depression. Self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence at end-of-treatment (EOT; Week 14) and long-term follow-up (Week 27) was confirmed using breath carbon monoxide (≤6 parts per million). <em>Results</em>: In a logistic regression model, greater likelihood of abstinence at EOT was associated with varenicline vs. placebo (OR=5.52, 95 % CI=2.62–11.60), lower cigarette dependence (OR=0.42, 95 % CI=0.19–0.90), and fast nicotine metabolism (OR=1.64, 95 % CI=1.06–2.54). In second logistic regression model, greater likelihood of Week 27 abstinence was associated with varenicline vs placebo (OR=3.06, 95 % CI=1.32–7.07) and fast nicotine metabolism (OR=2.06, 95 % CI=1.20–3.54). None of the baseline factors interacted with behavioral or pharmacological treatment to predict abstinence at either time point.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Varenicline should be a primary treatment consideration for individuals with MDD. Stable psychiatric status is not required for favorable treatment outcome. Further effort is needed to identify behavioral interventions that can be added to varenicline to improve quit rates for individuals with MDD.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence\",\"volume\":\"274 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871625002145\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871625002145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Baseline predictors of smoking cessation among individuals with current or past major depressive disorder following treatment with varenicline and intensive behavioral treatment
Introduction
In a 2 × 2 factorial clinical trial with 300 individuals with current or past major depressive disorder (MDD), varenicline significantly increased smoking cessation, compared to placebo, whereas behavioral activation for smoking cessation yielded similar quit rates compared to standard behavioral treatment. In this secondary analysis, we evaluated whether participant characteristics at baseline predicted abstinence or moderated the effects of behavioral treatment or pharmacotherapy on abstinence.
Methods
The sample was racially and socioeconomically diverse and spanned varied psychiatric presentations: 49 % of participants had current MDD, 44 % had other mental health disorders, and only 27 % were being treated for their depression. Self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence at end-of-treatment (EOT; Week 14) and long-term follow-up (Week 27) was confirmed using breath carbon monoxide (≤6 parts per million). Results: In a logistic regression model, greater likelihood of abstinence at EOT was associated with varenicline vs. placebo (OR=5.52, 95 % CI=2.62–11.60), lower cigarette dependence (OR=0.42, 95 % CI=0.19–0.90), and fast nicotine metabolism (OR=1.64, 95 % CI=1.06–2.54). In second logistic regression model, greater likelihood of Week 27 abstinence was associated with varenicline vs placebo (OR=3.06, 95 % CI=1.32–7.07) and fast nicotine metabolism (OR=2.06, 95 % CI=1.20–3.54). None of the baseline factors interacted with behavioral or pharmacological treatment to predict abstinence at either time point.
Conclusions
Varenicline should be a primary treatment consideration for individuals with MDD. Stable psychiatric status is not required for favorable treatment outcome. Further effort is needed to identify behavioral interventions that can be added to varenicline to improve quit rates for individuals with MDD.
期刊介绍:
Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.