准备实习的护理医生-准备实习的护士：行动的号召

IF 4.1 2区医学 Q1 NURSING

Nursing Outlook Pub Date : 2025-06-28 DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102469

Julee Briscoe Waldrop DNP, FAANP, FAAN , Jayne Jennings Dunlap DNP, FNP-C, EBP-C , Anne Derouin DNP, CPNP-PC, FAANP

{"title":"准备实习的护理医生-准备实习的护士：行动的号召","authors":"Julee Briscoe Waldrop DNP, FAANP, FAAN , Jayne Jennings Dunlap DNP, FNP-C, EBP-C , Anne Derouin DNP, CPNP-PC, FAANP","doi":"10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>More than two decades after the inception of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree, confusion persists about the competencies that DNP-prepared nurses bring to practice. Despite growth in programs nationwide, DNP projects often lack methodological rigor, resulting in variable outcomes and unclear stakeholder value.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To ensure consistency, programs must adopt a competency-based approach that prepares nurses to lead evidence-based practice/quality improvement, program evaluation, and policy analysis initiatives.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Mountain Model provides a clear framework aligned with national standards to differentiate DNP-prepared practice from that of MSN- and PhD-prepared nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Faculty must be equipped to mentor students in high-impact projects and reevaluate curricula to support skill development relevant to practice. Without bold curricular and faculty development reforms, the DNP graduate’s value will remain questioned.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Nursing programs must prioritize clarity, accountability, and competency in preparing nurse leaders to transform healthcare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54705,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Outlook","volume":"73 5","pages":"Article 102469"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The practice ready Doctor of Nursing Practice-prepared nurse: A call to action\",\"authors\":\"Julee Briscoe Waldrop DNP, FAANP, FAAN , Jayne Jennings Dunlap DNP, FNP-C, EBP-C , Anne Derouin DNP, CPNP-PC, FAANP\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>More than two decades after the inception of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree, confusion persists about the competencies that DNP-prepared nurses bring to practice. Despite growth in programs nationwide, DNP projects often lack methodological rigor, resulting in variable outcomes and unclear stakeholder value.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To ensure consistency, programs must adopt a competency-based approach that prepares nurses to lead evidence-based practice/quality improvement, program evaluation, and policy analysis initiatives.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Mountain Model provides a clear framework aligned with national standards to differentiate DNP-prepared practice from that of MSN- and PhD-prepared nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Faculty must be equipped to mentor students in high-impact projects and reevaluate curricula to support skill development relevant to practice. Without bold curricular and faculty development reforms, the DNP graduate’s value will remain questioned.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Nursing programs must prioritize clarity, accountability, and competency in preparing nurse leaders to transform healthcare.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"volume\":\"73 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 102469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655425001228\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655425001228","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在护理实践博士（DNP）学位成立二十多年后，关于DNP准备护士在实践中所带来的能力的困惑仍然存在。尽管全国范围内的项目有所增长，但DNP项目往往缺乏方法上的严谨性，导致结果不一，利益相关者的价值也不明确。目的：为了确保一致性，项目必须采用基于能力的方法，使护士能够领导循证实践/质量改进、项目评估和政策分析举措。方法山模型提供了一个与国家标准一致的清晰框架，以区分np准备实践与MSN和博士准备护士的实践。教师必须具备在高影响力项目中指导学生的能力，并重新评估课程，以支持与实践相关的技能发展。如果没有大胆的课程和师资发展改革，DNP毕业生的价值将继续受到质疑。结论护理计划必须优先考虑清晰，问责制和能力，以准备护士领导转变医疗保健。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The practice ready Doctor of Nursing Practice-prepared nurse: A call to action

Background

More than two decades after the inception of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree, confusion persists about the competencies that DNP-prepared nurses bring to practice. Despite growth in programs nationwide, DNP projects often lack methodological rigor, resulting in variable outcomes and unclear stakeholder value.

Purpose

To ensure consistency, programs must adopt a competency-based approach that prepares nurses to lead evidence-based practice/quality improvement, program evaluation, and policy analysis initiatives.

Methods

The Mountain Model provides a clear framework aligned with national standards to differentiate DNP-prepared practice from that of MSN- and PhD-prepared nurses.

Discussion

Faculty must be equipped to mentor students in high-impact projects and reevaluate curricula to support skill development relevant to practice. Without bold curricular and faculty development reforms, the DNP graduate’s value will remain questioned.

Conclusion

Nursing programs must prioritize clarity, accountability, and competency in preparing nurse leaders to transform healthcare.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Nursing Outlook 医学-护理

CiteScore

6.20

自引率

7.00%

发文量

109

审稿时长

25 days

期刊介绍： Nursing Outlook, a bimonthly journal, provides innovative ideas for nursing leaders through peer-reviewed articles and timely reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in nursing practice, education, and research, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. Nursing Outlook is the official journal of the American Academy of Nursing and the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science and supports their mission to serve the public and the nursing profession by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. The journal is included in MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Journal Citation Reports published by Clarivate Analytics.