加州烟草税的增加与戒烟的增加有关

Shu-Hong Zhu, Christopher M Anderson, Yue-Lin Zhuang, Hai-Yen Sung, Anthony C Gamst
{"title":"加州烟草税的增加与戒烟的增加有关","authors":"Shu-Hong Zhu, Christopher M Anderson, Yue-Lin Zhuang, Hai-Yen Sung, Anthony C Gamst","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background In November 2016, California voters approved Proposition 56, increasing the cigarette tax by $2.00 per pack and nearly tripling spending on tobacco prevention. This study examined whether the initiative was associated with increased smoking cessation. Methods States in the United States were categorized into 3 groups: California, 18 other states (including the District of Columbia) that raised taxes, and 32 states that did not raise taxes. Tax and price increases, tobacco prevention spending per capita, 3-month smoking cessation rates using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (N = 443 054), and the proportion of daily smoking were compared for 2014-2016 and 2017-2019 for these groups. Results California had the largest increases in cigarette price (30.8%) and tobacco prevention spending (271.9%), both adjusted for inflation. Other states that raised taxes experienced price increases of 6.3% on average. The 3-month smoking cessation rate in California increased from 11.5% in 2014-2016 to 14.2% in 2017-2019 (P = .005). Among other states that raised taxes in that timeframe, cessation rates did not change significantly, from 8.6% to 8.7% (P = .755). Among states that did not raise taxes, cessation rates declined significantly, from 9.5% to 9.0% (P = .026). California also had a significant reduction in the proportion of daily smokers among those who did not quit (from 60.4% to 56.4%, P = .012). Conclusions A major cigarette tax increase was associated with increased smoking cessation in California. Policies increasing tobacco taxes and re-investing new revenue in tobacco prevention can increase population cessation.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of a major tobacco tax increase in California with increased smoking cessation\",\"authors\":\"Shu-Hong Zhu, Christopher M Anderson, Yue-Lin Zhuang, Hai-Yen Sung, Anthony C Gamst\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnci/djaf121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background In November 2016, California voters approved Proposition 56, increasing the cigarette tax by $2.00 per pack and nearly tripling spending on tobacco prevention. This study examined whether the initiative was associated with increased smoking cessation. Methods States in the United States were categorized into 3 groups: California, 18 other states (including the District of Columbia) that raised taxes, and 32 states that did not raise taxes. Tax and price increases, tobacco prevention spending per capita, 3-month smoking cessation rates using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (N = 443 054), and the proportion of daily smoking were compared for 2014-2016 and 2017-2019 for these groups. Results California had the largest increases in cigarette price (30.8%) and tobacco prevention spending (271.9%), both adjusted for inflation. Other states that raised taxes experienced price increases of 6.3% on average. The 3-month smoking cessation rate in California increased from 11.5% in 2014-2016 to 14.2% in 2017-2019 (P = .005). Among other states that raised taxes in that timeframe, cessation rates did not change significantly, from 8.6% to 8.7% (P = .755). Among states that did not raise taxes, cessation rates declined significantly, from 9.5% to 9.0% (P = .026). California also had a significant reduction in the proportion of daily smokers among those who did not quit (from 60.4% to 56.4%, P = .012). Conclusions A major cigarette tax increase was associated with increased smoking cessation in California. Policies increasing tobacco taxes and re-investing new revenue in tobacco prevention can increase population cessation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2016年11月,加州选民通过了第56号提案,将每包卷烟税提高2美元,并将烟草预防支出增加了近两倍。这项研究调查了这项倡议是否与戒烟增加有关。方法将美国各州分为3组:加利福尼亚州,其他18个州(包括哥伦比亚特区)增加税收,32个州不增加税收。比较了2014-2016年和2017-2019年这些群体的税收和价格上涨、人均烟草预防支出、使用行为风险因素监测系统数据的3个月戒烟率(N = 443 054)以及每日吸烟比例。结果加州的卷烟价格增幅最大(30.8%),烟草预防支出增幅最大(271.9%),两者均经通胀调整。其他提高税收的州平均价格上涨了6.3%。加州3个月戒烟率从2014-2016年的11.5%上升到2017-2019年的14.2% (P = 0.005)。在这段时间内提高税收的其他州中,戒烟率没有显著变化,从8.6%到8.7% (P = 0.755)。在没有提高税收的州,戒烟率显著下降,从9.5%降至9.0% (P = 0.026)。加州每日吸烟者在未戒烟者中的比例也显著下降(从60.4%降至56.4%,P = 0.012)。结论:在加州,烟草税的大幅增加与戒烟人数的增加有关。增加烟草税和将新收入再投资于烟草预防的政策可促进人口戒烟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of a major tobacco tax increase in California with increased smoking cessation
Background In November 2016, California voters approved Proposition 56, increasing the cigarette tax by $2.00 per pack and nearly tripling spending on tobacco prevention. This study examined whether the initiative was associated with increased smoking cessation. Methods States in the United States were categorized into 3 groups: California, 18 other states (including the District of Columbia) that raised taxes, and 32 states that did not raise taxes. Tax and price increases, tobacco prevention spending per capita, 3-month smoking cessation rates using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (N = 443 054), and the proportion of daily smoking were compared for 2014-2016 and 2017-2019 for these groups. Results California had the largest increases in cigarette price (30.8%) and tobacco prevention spending (271.9%), both adjusted for inflation. Other states that raised taxes experienced price increases of 6.3% on average. The 3-month smoking cessation rate in California increased from 11.5% in 2014-2016 to 14.2% in 2017-2019 (P = .005). Among other states that raised taxes in that timeframe, cessation rates did not change significantly, from 8.6% to 8.7% (P = .755). Among states that did not raise taxes, cessation rates declined significantly, from 9.5% to 9.0% (P = .026). California also had a significant reduction in the proportion of daily smokers among those who did not quit (from 60.4% to 56.4%, P = .012). Conclusions A major cigarette tax increase was associated with increased smoking cessation in California. Policies increasing tobacco taxes and re-investing new revenue in tobacco prevention can increase population cessation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信