Ibrahim O Sawaid, Zohar Din, Efrat Golan, Eytan Ruppin, Avivit Golan-Cohen, Ilan Green, Eugene Merzon, Shlomo Vinker, Abraham O Samson, Ariel Israel
{"title":"质子泵抑制剂和上消化道癌症:一项匹配的病例对照研究,解决了适应症的混淆。","authors":"Ibrahim O Sawaid, Zohar Din, Efrat Golan, Eytan Ruppin, Avivit Golan-Cohen, Ilan Green, Eugene Merzon, Shlomo Vinker, Abraham O Samson, Ariel Israel","doi":"10.1101/2025.06.13.25329558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer while addressing potential confounding by indication.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Matched case-control study using multivariable conditional logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Electronic health records from a national health provider.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients diagnosed with upper GI cancer (n=875), each matched with 10 cancer-free controls (n=8750) by age, sex, and ethnic group.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for upper GI cancer associated with prior exposure to PPIs, H2 receptor antagonists, or antacids, with medication exposure modelled as multiple binary variables corresponding to distinct time windows before the index date. Additional models adjusted for GI-related diagnoses recorded prior to the index date (e.g., gastritis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PPI use in the five years before the index date was initially associated with increased odds of upper GI malignancy (e.g., esomeprazole aOR 3.90 [95% CI 3.14 to 4.84]; omeprazole aOR 2.60 [2.22 to 3.06]). However, when exposure was modelled as separate binary variables for each time window, the association was strongest for use within six months of diagnosis and was not observed-or reversed-for more remote exposures. After excluding the final year before diagnosis and adjusting for symptom-related diagnoses, no positive association remained. Remote PPI use was associated with reduced risk (e.g., omeprazole more than 3 years before the index date: aOR 0.62 [0.51 to 0.75]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The association between PPI use and upper GI malignancy appears to reflect confounding by indication, with PPIs prescribed in response to early symptoms associated with increased cancer risk. After accounting for timing of use and underlying GI diagnoses, no harmful association remained. These findings suggest that new-onset upper GI symptoms warrant investigation for malignancy, rather than attribution of risk to acid-suppressive therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proton pump inhibitors and upper gastrointestinal cancer: a matched case-control study addressing confounding by indication.\",\"authors\":\"Ibrahim O Sawaid, Zohar Din, Efrat Golan, Eytan Ruppin, Avivit Golan-Cohen, Ilan Green, Eugene Merzon, Shlomo Vinker, Abraham O Samson, Ariel Israel\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2025.06.13.25329558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer while addressing potential confounding by indication.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Matched case-control study using multivariable conditional logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Electronic health records from a national health provider.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients diagnosed with upper GI cancer (n=875), each matched with 10 cancer-free controls (n=8750) by age, sex, and ethnic group.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for upper GI cancer associated with prior exposure to PPIs, H2 receptor antagonists, or antacids, with medication exposure modelled as multiple binary variables corresponding to distinct time windows before the index date. Additional models adjusted for GI-related diagnoses recorded prior to the index date (e.g., gastritis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PPI use in the five years before the index date was initially associated with increased odds of upper GI malignancy (e.g., esomeprazole aOR 3.90 [95% CI 3.14 to 4.84]; omeprazole aOR 2.60 [2.22 to 3.06]). However, when exposure was modelled as separate binary variables for each time window, the association was strongest for use within six months of diagnosis and was not observed-or reversed-for more remote exposures. After excluding the final year before diagnosis and adjusting for symptom-related diagnoses, no positive association remained. Remote PPI use was associated with reduced risk (e.g., omeprazole more than 3 years before the index date: aOR 0.62 [0.51 to 0.75]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The association between PPI use and upper GI malignancy appears to reflect confounding by indication, with PPIs prescribed in response to early symptoms associated with increased cancer risk. After accounting for timing of use and underlying GI diagnoses, no harmful association remained. These findings suggest that new-onset upper GI symptoms warrant investigation for malignancy, rather than attribution of risk to acid-suppressive therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191108/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.13.25329558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.13.25329558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的使用与上胃肠道(GI)癌症之间的关系,同时解决潜在的适应症混淆。设计:采用多变量条件逻辑回归的匹配病例对照研究。设置:来自国家医疗服务提供者的电子健康记录。参与者:诊断为上消化道癌症的患者(n=875),根据年龄,性别和种族分组,每个患者与10名无癌症对照(n=8750)相匹配。主要结局指标:与既往暴露于PPIs、H2受体拮抗剂或抗酸剂相关的上消化道癌症的调整优势比(aORs),药物暴露建模为多个二元变量,对应于索引日期之前不同的时间窗口。根据索引日期之前记录的gi相关诊断(如胃炎、胃食管反流病、消化性溃疡疾病)调整的其他模型。结果:在指标日期前5年内使用PPI最初与上消化道恶性肿瘤的几率增加相关(例如,埃索美拉唑的or为3.90 [95% CI 3.14至4.84];奥美拉唑or 2.60[2.22 ~ 3.06])。然而,当暴露作为每个时间窗口的单独二元变量建模时,这种关联在诊断后6个月内是最强的,而在更遥远的暴露中没有观察到-或相反。在排除诊断前的最后一年并调整症状相关诊断后,没有正相关存在。远程使用PPI与风险降低相关(例如,在指标日期前3年以上使用奥美拉唑:aOR为0.62[0.51 - 0.75])。结论和相关性:PPI使用与上消化道恶性肿瘤之间的关联似乎反映了适应症的混淆,使用PPI是对与癌症风险增加相关的早期症状的反应。在考虑了使用时间和潜在的GI诊断后,没有有害的关联。这些发现表明,新发的上消化道症状需要对恶性肿瘤进行调查,而不是将风险归因于抑酸治疗。
Proton pump inhibitors and upper gastrointestinal cancer: a matched case-control study addressing confounding by indication.
Objectives: To assess the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer while addressing potential confounding by indication.
Design: Matched case-control study using multivariable conditional logistic regression.
Setting: Electronic health records from a national health provider.
Participants: Patients diagnosed with upper GI cancer (n=875), each matched with 10 cancer-free controls (n=8750) by age, sex, and ethnic group.
Main outcome measures: Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for upper GI cancer associated with prior exposure to PPIs, H2 receptor antagonists, or antacids, with medication exposure modelled as multiple binary variables corresponding to distinct time windows before the index date. Additional models adjusted for GI-related diagnoses recorded prior to the index date (e.g., gastritis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease).
Results: PPI use in the five years before the index date was initially associated with increased odds of upper GI malignancy (e.g., esomeprazole aOR 3.90 [95% CI 3.14 to 4.84]; omeprazole aOR 2.60 [2.22 to 3.06]). However, when exposure was modelled as separate binary variables for each time window, the association was strongest for use within six months of diagnosis and was not observed-or reversed-for more remote exposures. After excluding the final year before diagnosis and adjusting for symptom-related diagnoses, no positive association remained. Remote PPI use was associated with reduced risk (e.g., omeprazole more than 3 years before the index date: aOR 0.62 [0.51 to 0.75]).
Conclusions and relevance: The association between PPI use and upper GI malignancy appears to reflect confounding by indication, with PPIs prescribed in response to early symptoms associated with increased cancer risk. After accounting for timing of use and underlying GI diagnoses, no harmful association remained. These findings suggest that new-onset upper GI symptoms warrant investigation for malignancy, rather than attribution of risk to acid-suppressive therapy.