Michele W Marenus, Mary Marzec, Amy Kilbourne, Natalie Colabianchi, Weiyun Chen
{"title":"职场健康文化、远程工作和员工幸福感:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Michele W Marenus, Mary Marzec, Amy Kilbourne, Natalie Colabianchi, Weiyun Chen","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the differences in perceptions of workplace culture of health, physical activity (PA), psychological well-being, and work productivity among three workforce settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods study design was utilized, including data from a questionnaire ( n = 520) and from interviews ( n = 20). Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, and multivariate analysis of variance, while qualitative data was analyzed using thematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Onsite employees had higher levels of total PA than both hybrid and remote employees ( P < 0.05). Additionally, hybrid employees reported higher levels of self-acceptance than both onsite and remote employees ( P < 0.05). Qualitative findings highlighted remote work's autonomy and flexibility, leadership's role, and work-from-home challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remote and hybrid work is associated with both positive and negative well-being outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":"813-822"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workplace Culture of Health, Remote Work, and Employee Well-being: A Mixed-Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Michele W Marenus, Mary Marzec, Amy Kilbourne, Natalie Colabianchi, Weiyun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the differences in perceptions of workplace culture of health, physical activity (PA), psychological well-being, and work productivity among three workforce settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods study design was utilized, including data from a questionnaire ( n = 520) and from interviews ( n = 20). Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, and multivariate analysis of variance, while qualitative data was analyzed using thematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Onsite employees had higher levels of total PA than both hybrid and remote employees ( P < 0.05). Additionally, hybrid employees reported higher levels of self-acceptance than both onsite and remote employees ( P < 0.05). Qualitative findings highlighted remote work's autonomy and flexibility, leadership's role, and work-from-home challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remote and hybrid work is associated with both positive and negative well-being outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"813-822\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Workplace Culture of Health, Remote Work, and Employee Well-being: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Objective: This study explored the differences in perceptions of workplace culture of health, physical activity (PA), psychological well-being, and work productivity among three workforce settings.
Methods: A mixed methods study design was utilized, including data from a questionnaire ( n = 520) and from interviews ( n = 20). Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, and multivariate analysis of variance, while qualitative data was analyzed using thematic content analysis.
Results: Onsite employees had higher levels of total PA than both hybrid and remote employees ( P < 0.05). Additionally, hybrid employees reported higher levels of self-acceptance than both onsite and remote employees ( P < 0.05). Qualitative findings highlighted remote work's autonomy and flexibility, leadership's role, and work-from-home challenges.
Conclusions: Remote and hybrid work is associated with both positive and negative well-being outcomes.