Maryline Krummenacher, Mika Tarvainen, Estelle Montet, Michelle C Turner, Irina Guseva Canu
{"title":"哪种设备最适合现场测量心率变异性？两种主要选择的比较评价。","authors":"Maryline Krummenacher, Mika Tarvainen, Estelle Montet, Michelle C Turner, Irina Guseva Canu","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the Polar H10 and Bittium Faros™ HRV monitors for use in occupational and environmental health research, considering data collection, storage, transfer, resource needs, and limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review, device testing, and expert interviews were conducted to assess device performance and usability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Polar H10 is affordable, records RR intervals for up to 20 hours offline, and requires a smartwatch and app for extended storage. Bittium Faros™ is a certified ECG monitor that records full waveforms, supports long measurements, and enables automatic data transfer. Both devices can be worn with a chest strap, but placement issues may affect data quality. Patch electrodes improve stability but may cause skin irritation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This assessment highlights key device differences to guide HRV monitor selection for occupational and environmental epidemiological studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WHICH DEVICE IS MOST SUITABLE FOR MEASURING HEART RATE VARIABILITY IN THE FIELD? A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TWO LEADING OPTIONS.\",\"authors\":\"Maryline Krummenacher, Mika Tarvainen, Estelle Montet, Michelle C Turner, Irina Guseva Canu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the Polar H10 and Bittium Faros™ HRV monitors for use in occupational and environmental health research, considering data collection, storage, transfer, resource needs, and limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review, device testing, and expert interviews were conducted to assess device performance and usability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Polar H10 is affordable, records RR intervals for up to 20 hours offline, and requires a smartwatch and app for extended storage. Bittium Faros™ is a certified ECG monitor that records full waveforms, supports long measurements, and enables automatic data transfer. Both devices can be worn with a chest strap, but placement issues may affect data quality. Patch electrodes improve stability but may cause skin irritation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This assessment highlights key device differences to guide HRV monitor selection for occupational and environmental epidemiological studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003479\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
WHICH DEVICE IS MOST SUITABLE FOR MEASURING HEART RATE VARIABILITY IN THE FIELD? A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TWO LEADING OPTIONS.
Objective: To compare the Polar H10 and Bittium Faros™ HRV monitors for use in occupational and environmental health research, considering data collection, storage, transfer, resource needs, and limitations.
Methods: A literature review, device testing, and expert interviews were conducted to assess device performance and usability.
Results: Polar H10 is affordable, records RR intervals for up to 20 hours offline, and requires a smartwatch and app for extended storage. Bittium Faros™ is a certified ECG monitor that records full waveforms, supports long measurements, and enables automatic data transfer. Both devices can be worn with a chest strap, but placement issues may affect data quality. Patch electrodes improve stability but may cause skin irritation.
Conclusions: This assessment highlights key device differences to guide HRV monitor selection for occupational and environmental epidemiological studies.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
