Karen S. Fiano , Lynn Kassel , Mary Barna Bridgeman , Angela Maria McBride , Katherine Lampman , Rachel Antypas , Winter J. Smith , Elizabeth Ferro , Jason S. Sprouse , Brianna Lewis , Robert C. Brucia
{"title":"NAPLEX实践分析和确定初级药剂师的知识和技能。","authors":"Karen S. Fiano , Lynn Kassel , Mary Barna Bridgeman , Angela Maria McBride , Katherine Lampman , Rachel Antypas , Winter J. Smith , Elizabeth Ferro , Jason S. Sprouse , Brianna Lewis , Robert C. Brucia","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe the results of a practice analysis defining the knowledge, skills, and abilities expected of entry-level pharmacists and the development of the resultant North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) content outline (CO).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The National Association of Boards of Pharmacy convened a representative panel of pharmacists (<em>n</em> = 14) to create a practice analysis document and CO. Panel experience, current NAPLEX competency statements, and guiding documents were used in the process. A survey was administered to a large sample of practicing pharmacists to validate the CO and determine final weights for each domain. Respondents selected a relevance rating for the lowest content domain level on a four-point Likert scale (1 = not at all relevant; 4 = very relevant). Survey results were used to develop the final CO, which was approved by the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy to guide NAPLEX development.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A practice analysis document was created listing 5 content domains along with the tasks, knowledge, and skills associated with each domain. A total of 1950 pharmacists fully or partially completed the survey and provided relevance ratings for the lowest level of each content domain (<em>n</em> = 54). The mean relevance rating was 3.25 (SD = 0.42; range 2.22 to 3.85), indicating a high degree of relevance for each content domain to practice. A final CO was created, which is used to define content areas to be assessed on the NAPLEX.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A practice analysis process produced valuable resources for defining the expected knowledge, skills, and abilities for entry-level pharmacists. These resources can be utilized by educators to prepare graduates for the NAPLEX.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 8","pages":"Article 101438"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NAPLEX Practice Analysis and Determining the Knowledge and Skills Expected of an Entry-Level Pharmacist\",\"authors\":\"Karen S. Fiano , Lynn Kassel , Mary Barna Bridgeman , Angela Maria McBride , Katherine Lampman , Rachel Antypas , Winter J. Smith , Elizabeth Ferro , Jason S. Sprouse , Brianna Lewis , Robert C. Brucia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe the results of a practice analysis defining the knowledge, skills, and abilities expected of entry-level pharmacists and the development of the resultant North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) content outline (CO).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The National Association of Boards of Pharmacy convened a representative panel of pharmacists (<em>n</em> = 14) to create a practice analysis document and CO. Panel experience, current NAPLEX competency statements, and guiding documents were used in the process. A survey was administered to a large sample of practicing pharmacists to validate the CO and determine final weights for each domain. Respondents selected a relevance rating for the lowest content domain level on a four-point Likert scale (1 = not at all relevant; 4 = very relevant). Survey results were used to develop the final CO, which was approved by the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy to guide NAPLEX development.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A practice analysis document was created listing 5 content domains along with the tasks, knowledge, and skills associated with each domain. A total of 1950 pharmacists fully or partially completed the survey and provided relevance ratings for the lowest level of each content domain (<em>n</em> = 54). The mean relevance rating was 3.25 (SD = 0.42; range 2.22 to 3.85), indicating a high degree of relevance for each content domain to practice. A final CO was created, which is used to define content areas to be assessed on the NAPLEX.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A practice analysis process produced valuable resources for defining the expected knowledge, skills, and abilities for entry-level pharmacists. These resources can be utilized by educators to prepare graduates for the NAPLEX.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\"89 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 101438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000294592500083X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000294592500083X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
NAPLEX Practice Analysis and Determining the Knowledge and Skills Expected of an Entry-Level Pharmacist
Objective
To describe the results of a practice analysis defining the knowledge, skills, and abilities expected of entry-level pharmacists and the development of the resultant North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) content outline (CO).
Methods
The National Association of Boards of Pharmacy convened a representative panel of pharmacists (n = 14) to create a practice analysis document and CO. Panel experience, current NAPLEX competency statements, and guiding documents were used in the process. A survey was administered to a large sample of practicing pharmacists to validate the CO and determine final weights for each domain. Respondents selected a relevance rating for the lowest content domain level on a four-point Likert scale (1 = not at all relevant; 4 = very relevant). Survey results were used to develop the final CO, which was approved by the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy to guide NAPLEX development.
Results
A practice analysis document was created listing 5 content domains along with the tasks, knowledge, and skills associated with each domain. A total of 1950 pharmacists fully or partially completed the survey and provided relevance ratings for the lowest level of each content domain (n = 54). The mean relevance rating was 3.25 (SD = 0.42; range 2.22 to 3.85), indicating a high degree of relevance for each content domain to practice. A final CO was created, which is used to define content areas to be assessed on the NAPLEX.
Conclusion
A practice analysis process produced valuable resources for defining the expected knowledge, skills, and abilities for entry-level pharmacists. These resources can be utilized by educators to prepare graduates for the NAPLEX.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.