COVID-19大流行期间电休克治疗实践的演变:系统综述

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Josh Martin, Argyrios Perivolaris, Nadeen M Tantash, Ilya Demchenko, Haochen Yu, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Karen Foley, Keyvan Karkouti, Sidney H Kennedy, Akash Goel, Jamie Robertson, Alon Vaisman, David Koczerginski, Benoit H Mulsant, Sagar V Parikh, Daniel M Blumberger, Alastair J Flint, Venkat Bhat
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间电休克治疗实践的演变:系统综述","authors":"Josh Martin, Argyrios Perivolaris, Nadeen M Tantash, Ilya Demchenko, Haochen Yu, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Karen Foley, Keyvan Karkouti, Sidney H Kennedy, Akash Goel, Jamie Robertson, Alon Vaisman, David Koczerginski, Benoit H Mulsant, Sagar V Parikh, Daniel M Blumberger, Alastair J Flint, Venkat Bhat","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the provision of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) across the globe, challenging ECT services to develop protocols that preserve access to this life-saving treatment. This systematic review maps the literature on global ECT practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The English-language literature was searched through OVID (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase) on August 7, 2024. Included articles described ECT practice at ECT-providing centers anywhere in the world during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies were critically appraised, and descriptive synthesis focused on ECT capacity, decision making, hospital resources, procedural modifications, and patient outcomes. Of the 297 identified articles, 61 met the inclusion criteria. In the published articles, 90.7% of articles reported a reduced treatment volume. ECT services were also shifted to prioritize inpatient treatments. Decision making was balanced between administrators and ECT unit staff, although only 2 articles (3.2%) reported the involvement of clinical ethicists in decision making. Other common challenges included staff shortages or redeployment (39.3%), personal protective equipment shortages (18.0%), and limited space availability (11.5%). Among studies that reported on it, relapse occurred in 85.0% articles due to ECT service disruptions. Significant variation in procedural modifications and mitigation strategies were observed, with limited consensus on best practices. To better understand these variations, we developed a decision matrix categorizing ECT service based on the transmission risks and resource availability. This review highlights the importance of evaluating long-term ECT disruptions and developing policies ensuring service continuity in future public health emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ect","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution of Electroconvulsive Therapy Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Josh Martin, Argyrios Perivolaris, Nadeen M Tantash, Ilya Demchenko, Haochen Yu, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Karen Foley, Keyvan Karkouti, Sidney H Kennedy, Akash Goel, Jamie Robertson, Alon Vaisman, David Koczerginski, Benoit H Mulsant, Sagar V Parikh, Daniel M Blumberger, Alastair J Flint, Venkat Bhat\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the provision of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) across the globe, challenging ECT services to develop protocols that preserve access to this life-saving treatment. This systematic review maps the literature on global ECT practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The English-language literature was searched through OVID (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase) on August 7, 2024. Included articles described ECT practice at ECT-providing centers anywhere in the world during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies were critically appraised, and descriptive synthesis focused on ECT capacity, decision making, hospital resources, procedural modifications, and patient outcomes. Of the 297 identified articles, 61 met the inclusion criteria. In the published articles, 90.7% of articles reported a reduced treatment volume. ECT services were also shifted to prioritize inpatient treatments. Decision making was balanced between administrators and ECT unit staff, although only 2 articles (3.2%) reported the involvement of clinical ethicists in decision making. Other common challenges included staff shortages or redeployment (39.3%), personal protective equipment shortages (18.0%), and limited space availability (11.5%). Among studies that reported on it, relapse occurred in 85.0% articles due to ECT service disruptions. Significant variation in procedural modifications and mitigation strategies were observed, with limited consensus on best practices. To better understand these variations, we developed a decision matrix categorizing ECT service based on the transmission risks and resource availability. This review highlights the importance of evaluating long-term ECT disruptions and developing policies ensuring service continuity in future public health emergencies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ect\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001174\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ect","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行扰乱了全球电休克治疗(ECT)的提供,给ECT服务机构制定方案以保障这种救命疗法的可及性带来了挑战。本系统综述绘制了COVID-19大流行期间全球ECT实践的文献图。在2024年8月7日通过OVID (MEDLINE, PsycINFO和Embase)检索英语文献。纳入的文章描述了在COVID-19大流行期间世界各地提供ECT的中心的ECT实践。对研究进行了严格的评价,描述性综合侧重于ECT能力、决策、医院资源、程序修改和患者预后。在确定的297篇文章中,61篇符合纳入标准。在已发表的文章中,90.7%的文章报告了治疗量的减少。ECT服务也被转移到住院治疗的优先级。尽管只有2篇文章(3.2%)报道了临床伦理学家参与决策,但行政人员和ECT单位工作人员之间的决策是平衡的。其他常见挑战包括工作人员短缺或重新部署(39.3%)、个人防护装备短缺(18.0%)和可用空间有限(11.5%)。在相关研究中,85.0%的文章因电痉挛治疗中断而复发。在程序修改和缓解战略方面存在重大差异,对最佳做法的共识有限。为了更好地理解这些变化,我们开发了一个基于传输风险和资源可用性对ECT服务进行分类的决策矩阵。这一综述强调了评估长期电痉挛治疗中断和制定政策以确保在未来突发公共卫生事件中服务连续性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evolution of Electroconvulsive Therapy Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the provision of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) across the globe, challenging ECT services to develop protocols that preserve access to this life-saving treatment. This systematic review maps the literature on global ECT practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The English-language literature was searched through OVID (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase) on August 7, 2024. Included articles described ECT practice at ECT-providing centers anywhere in the world during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies were critically appraised, and descriptive synthesis focused on ECT capacity, decision making, hospital resources, procedural modifications, and patient outcomes. Of the 297 identified articles, 61 met the inclusion criteria. In the published articles, 90.7% of articles reported a reduced treatment volume. ECT services were also shifted to prioritize inpatient treatments. Decision making was balanced between administrators and ECT unit staff, although only 2 articles (3.2%) reported the involvement of clinical ethicists in decision making. Other common challenges included staff shortages or redeployment (39.3%), personal protective equipment shortages (18.0%), and limited space availability (11.5%). Among studies that reported on it, relapse occurred in 85.0% articles due to ECT service disruptions. Significant variation in procedural modifications and mitigation strategies were observed, with limited consensus on best practices. To better understand these variations, we developed a decision matrix categorizing ECT service based on the transmission risks and resource availability. This review highlights the importance of evaluating long-term ECT disruptions and developing policies ensuring service continuity in future public health emergencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ect
Journal of Ect 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of ECT covers all aspects of contemporary electroconvulsive therapy, reporting on major clinical and research developments worldwide. Leading clinicians and researchers examine the effects of induced seizures on behavior and on organ systems; review important research results on the mode of induction, occurrence, and propagation of seizures; and explore the difficult sociological, ethical, and legal issues concerning the use of ECT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信