收缩左心经皮导管VAD的混合生物物理联合模拟。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Greg W Burgreen, James F Antaki
{"title":"收缩左心经皮导管VAD的混合生物物理联合模拟。","authors":"Greg W Burgreen, James F Antaki","doi":"10.1007/s13239-025-00788-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are most often computationally evaluated as isolated devices subjected to idealized steady-state blood flow conditions. In clinical practice, these devices are connected to, or within, diseased pulsatile ventricles of the heart, which can dramatically affect the hemodynamics, hence hemocompatibility-related adverse events such as hemolysis, bleeding, and thrombosis. Therefore, improved simulations are needed to more realistically represent the coupling of devices to the assisted ventricle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this need, we present a hybrid biophysics co-simulation strategy to evaluate the blood flow dynamics of a percutaneous catheter VAD in-situ within a pulsatile ventricle coupled to the circulation. Our hybrid strategy utilizes a computationally inexpensive lumped parameter network (LPN) to compute cardiac dynamics and provide one-way coupled physiologically-realistic boundary conditions to a high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model to simulate detailed hemodynamics of the VAD and the VAD-assisted left heart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Numerical simulation of a high-speed rotodynamic catheter pump configured as a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) generated a realistic reproduction of the unsteady blood velocity field over one complete cardiac cycle. The biophysics co-simulation strategy resulted in approximately one order of magnitude speed-up compared to a bidirectionally coupled CFD co-simulation. The simulated flow fields revealed persistent swirling blood flow within the ventricle, unsteady flow discharged to aorta by the pump, and significant variations of surface washing around the pump housing during the cardiac cycle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study represents a stepping stone toward physiologically and anatomically realistic evaluation of mechanical circulatory support devices that directly complements and reduces extensive in-vivo studies to mitigates risk of adverse events in the clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":54322,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid Biophysics Co-Simulation of a Percutaneous Catheter VAD within a Contractile Left Heart.\",\"authors\":\"Greg W Burgreen, James F Antaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13239-025-00788-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are most often computationally evaluated as isolated devices subjected to idealized steady-state blood flow conditions. In clinical practice, these devices are connected to, or within, diseased pulsatile ventricles of the heart, which can dramatically affect the hemodynamics, hence hemocompatibility-related adverse events such as hemolysis, bleeding, and thrombosis. Therefore, improved simulations are needed to more realistically represent the coupling of devices to the assisted ventricle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this need, we present a hybrid biophysics co-simulation strategy to evaluate the blood flow dynamics of a percutaneous catheter VAD in-situ within a pulsatile ventricle coupled to the circulation. Our hybrid strategy utilizes a computationally inexpensive lumped parameter network (LPN) to compute cardiac dynamics and provide one-way coupled physiologically-realistic boundary conditions to a high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model to simulate detailed hemodynamics of the VAD and the VAD-assisted left heart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Numerical simulation of a high-speed rotodynamic catheter pump configured as a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) generated a realistic reproduction of the unsteady blood velocity field over one complete cardiac cycle. The biophysics co-simulation strategy resulted in approximately one order of magnitude speed-up compared to a bidirectionally coupled CFD co-simulation. The simulated flow fields revealed persistent swirling blood flow within the ventricle, unsteady flow discharged to aorta by the pump, and significant variations of surface washing around the pump housing during the cardiac cycle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study represents a stepping stone toward physiologically and anatomically realistic evaluation of mechanical circulatory support devices that directly complements and reduces extensive in-vivo studies to mitigates risk of adverse events in the clinical setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-025-00788-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-025-00788-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:心室辅助装置(VADs)通常作为孤立装置在理想稳态血流条件下进行计算评估。在临床实践中,这些装置与患病的心脏搏动心室相连或在其内部,这可能会显著影响血液动力学,从而导致与血液相容性相关的不良事件,如溶血、出血和血栓形成。因此,需要改进模拟,以更真实地表示设备与辅助心室的耦合。方法:为了满足这一需求,我们提出了一种混合生物物理联合模拟策略来评估搏动心室内经皮导管VAD原位与循环耦合的血流动力学。我们的混合策略利用计算成本低廉的集总参数网络(LPN)来计算心脏动力学,并为高保真计算流体动力学(CFD)模型提供单向耦合的生理现实边界条件,以模拟VAD和VAD辅助左心的详细血流动力学。结果:对配置为左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的高速旋转动力导管泵进行数值模拟,生成了一个完整心脏周期内不稳定血流场的真实再现。与双向耦合CFD联合模拟相比,生物物理联合模拟策略的速度提高了大约一个数量级。模拟的流场显示心室内持续旋转的血流,泵向主动脉排出的不稳定血流,以及在心脏周期内泵壳周围表面洗涤的显著变化。结论:本研究为机械循环支持装置的生理学和解剖学上的现实评估奠定了基础,直接补充和减少了广泛的体内研究,以减轻临床环境中不良事件的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hybrid Biophysics Co-Simulation of a Percutaneous Catheter VAD within a Contractile Left Heart.

Purpose: Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are most often computationally evaluated as isolated devices subjected to idealized steady-state blood flow conditions. In clinical practice, these devices are connected to, or within, diseased pulsatile ventricles of the heart, which can dramatically affect the hemodynamics, hence hemocompatibility-related adverse events such as hemolysis, bleeding, and thrombosis. Therefore, improved simulations are needed to more realistically represent the coupling of devices to the assisted ventricle.

Methods: To address this need, we present a hybrid biophysics co-simulation strategy to evaluate the blood flow dynamics of a percutaneous catheter VAD in-situ within a pulsatile ventricle coupled to the circulation. Our hybrid strategy utilizes a computationally inexpensive lumped parameter network (LPN) to compute cardiac dynamics and provide one-way coupled physiologically-realistic boundary conditions to a high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model to simulate detailed hemodynamics of the VAD and the VAD-assisted left heart.

Results: Numerical simulation of a high-speed rotodynamic catheter pump configured as a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) generated a realistic reproduction of the unsteady blood velocity field over one complete cardiac cycle. The biophysics co-simulation strategy resulted in approximately one order of magnitude speed-up compared to a bidirectionally coupled CFD co-simulation. The simulated flow fields revealed persistent swirling blood flow within the ventricle, unsteady flow discharged to aorta by the pump, and significant variations of surface washing around the pump housing during the cardiac cycle.

Conclusions: This study represents a stepping stone toward physiologically and anatomically realistic evaluation of mechanical circulatory support devices that directly complements and reduces extensive in-vivo studies to mitigates risk of adverse events in the clinical setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology
Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology is a journal publishing the spectrum of basic to translational research in all aspects of cardiovascular physiology and medical treatment. It is the forum for academic and industrial investigators to disseminate research that utilizes engineering principles and methods to advance fundamental knowledge and technological solutions related to the cardiovascular system. Manuscripts spanning from subcellular to systems level topics are invited, including but not limited to implantable medical devices, hemodynamics and tissue biomechanics, functional imaging, surgical devices, electrophysiology, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, diagnostic instruments, transport and delivery of biologics, and sensors. In addition to manuscripts describing the original publication of research, manuscripts reviewing developments in these topics or their state-of-art are also invited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信