四肢瘫痪性脑瘫患儿躯干控制、平衡及上肢功能的比较研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Burcin Ugur Tosun, Ozge Gokalp, Gulhan Yilmaz Gokmen, Emine Handan Tuzun
{"title":"四肢瘫痪性脑瘫患儿躯干控制、平衡及上肢功能的比较研究。","authors":"Burcin Ugur Tosun, Ozge Gokalp, Gulhan Yilmaz Gokmen, Emine Handan Tuzun","doi":"10.1159/000547129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to investigate trunk control, balance, and upper extremity skills quality in ambulatory children with diplegic cerebral palsy (CP) classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)-I and -II, as well as to compare the GMFCS groups among themselves and with healthy children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five children with spastic diplegic CP (11.80 ± 2.66 years) and 30 healthy children (13.57 ± 3.48 years) were included. Functional levels were classified with the GMFCS, with 13 children classified as GMFCS-I and 12 as GMFCS-II, while trunk control was assessed with the Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS), balance with the Single-Leg Stance and Four Square Step Tests, and upper extremity functionality with the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in age, body mass index, or gender distribution between the CP and control groups (p > 0.05). The healthy group outperformed both CP groups in all clinical evaluations. No significant differences were found between GMFCS-I and GMFCS-II groups in the Single-Leg Stance Test, Four Square Step Test, and QUEST parameters (p > 0.05). However, TCMS subdomains-static sitting (p = 0.009), dynamic reaching (p = 0.018), selective movement control (p = 0.012), and total scores (p = 0.006) were significantly higher in the GMFCS-I group. A moderate positive correlation and a 54% regression rate were observed between the QUEST and TCMS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trunk control is a key determinant of upper extremity skill quality in children with CP. Core stabilization should be prioritized to improve upper extremity functionality and manage disability levels effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":50585,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TRUNK CONTROL BALANCE AND UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION IN AMBULATORY CHILDREN WITH DIPLEGIC CEREBRAL PALSY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY.\",\"authors\":\"Burcin Ugur Tosun, Ozge Gokalp, Gulhan Yilmaz Gokmen, Emine Handan Tuzun\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000547129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to investigate trunk control, balance, and upper extremity skills quality in ambulatory children with diplegic cerebral palsy (CP) classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)-I and -II, as well as to compare the GMFCS groups among themselves and with healthy children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five children with spastic diplegic CP (11.80 ± 2.66 years) and 30 healthy children (13.57 ± 3.48 years) were included. Functional levels were classified with the GMFCS, with 13 children classified as GMFCS-I and 12 as GMFCS-II, while trunk control was assessed with the Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS), balance with the Single-Leg Stance and Four Square Step Tests, and upper extremity functionality with the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in age, body mass index, or gender distribution between the CP and control groups (p > 0.05). The healthy group outperformed both CP groups in all clinical evaluations. No significant differences were found between GMFCS-I and GMFCS-II groups in the Single-Leg Stance Test, Four Square Step Test, and QUEST parameters (p > 0.05). However, TCMS subdomains-static sitting (p = 0.009), dynamic reaching (p = 0.018), selective movement control (p = 0.012), and total scores (p = 0.006) were significantly higher in the GMFCS-I group. A moderate positive correlation and a 54% regression rate were observed between the QUEST and TCMS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trunk control is a key determinant of upper extremity skill quality in children with CP. Core stabilization should be prioritized to improve upper extremity functionality and manage disability levels effectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547129\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究旨在探讨大运动功能分类系统(GMFCS) i级和-II级双瘫性脑瘫(CP)患儿的躯干控制、平衡和上肢技能质量,并将GMFCS组与健康儿童进行比较。方法:选取25例痉挛性双瘫儿童(11.80±2.66岁)和30例健康儿童(13.57±3.48岁)。使用GMFCS对功能水平进行分类,其中13名儿童被分类为GMFCS- i, 12名儿童被分类为GMFCS- ii,同时使用躯干控制量表(TCMS)评估躯干控制,使用单腿站立和四方步测试评估平衡,使用上肢技能质量测试(QUEST)评估上肢功能。结果:CP组与对照组在年龄、体重指数、性别分布上无显著差异(p < 0.05)。健康组在所有临床评价中均优于两组。GMFCS-I组与GMFCS-II组在单腿站立检验、四方步检验、QUEST参数上无显著差异(p < 0.05)。然而,TCMS子域-静态坐姿(p = 0.009)、动态伸展(p = 0.018)、选择性运动控制(p = 0.012)和总分(p = 0.006)在GMFCS-I组显著更高。在QUEST和TCMS评分之间观察到中度正相关和54%的回归率。结论:躯干控制是CP患儿上肢技能质量的关键决定因素,应优先进行核心稳定治疗,以改善上肢功能,有效控制残疾水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TRUNK CONTROL BALANCE AND UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION IN AMBULATORY CHILDREN WITH DIPLEGIC CEREBRAL PALSY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY.

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate trunk control, balance, and upper extremity skills quality in ambulatory children with diplegic cerebral palsy (CP) classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)-I and -II, as well as to compare the GMFCS groups among themselves and with healthy children.

Methods: Twenty-five children with spastic diplegic CP (11.80 ± 2.66 years) and 30 healthy children (13.57 ± 3.48 years) were included. Functional levels were classified with the GMFCS, with 13 children classified as GMFCS-I and 12 as GMFCS-II, while trunk control was assessed with the Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS), balance with the Single-Leg Stance and Four Square Step Tests, and upper extremity functionality with the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST).

Results: There was no significant difference in age, body mass index, or gender distribution between the CP and control groups (p > 0.05). The healthy group outperformed both CP groups in all clinical evaluations. No significant differences were found between GMFCS-I and GMFCS-II groups in the Single-Leg Stance Test, Four Square Step Test, and QUEST parameters (p > 0.05). However, TCMS subdomains-static sitting (p = 0.009), dynamic reaching (p = 0.018), selective movement control (p = 0.012), and total scores (p = 0.006) were significantly higher in the GMFCS-I group. A moderate positive correlation and a 54% regression rate were observed between the QUEST and TCMS scores.

Conclusion: Trunk control is a key determinant of upper extremity skill quality in children with CP. Core stabilization should be prioritized to improve upper extremity functionality and manage disability levels effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Developmental Neuroscience
Developmental Neuroscience 医学-发育生物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Developmental Neuroscience'' is a multidisciplinary journal publishing papers covering all stages of invertebrate, vertebrate and human brain development. Emphasis is placed on publishing fundamental as well as translational studies that contribute to our understanding of mechanisms of normal development as well as genetic and environmental causes of abnormal brain development. The journal thus provides valuable information for both physicians and biologists. To meet the rapidly expanding information needs of its readers, the journal combines original papers that report on progress and advances in developmental neuroscience with concise mini-reviews that provide a timely overview of key topics, new insights and ongoing controversies. The editorial standards of ''Developmental Neuroscience'' are high. We are committed to publishing only high quality, complete papers that make significant contributions to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信