阿姆斯特丹拔牙自我效能量表(ASES-TR)。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Maaike G Beuling, Jason Nak, Jens Kober, Jean Pierre T F Ho, Jan de Lange, Raoul P P P Grasman, Tom C T van Riet
{"title":"阿姆斯特丹拔牙自我效能量表(ASES-TR)。","authors":"Maaike G Beuling, Jason Nak, Jens Kober, Jean Pierre T F Ho, Jan de Lange, Raoul P P P Grasman, Tom C T van Riet","doi":"10.1111/eje.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a questionnaire on dental students' self-efficacy with tooth removal, suitable for measuring the effectiveness of training methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To prepare and validate this questionnaire, we used the Association of Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) stepwise guide for developing questionnaires for educational research. In the validation process, our study group conducted two pilot studies, the first for an exploratory factor analysis and the second for a confirmatory factor analysis. In addition, the questionnaire was tested for convergence with the neuroticism subscale of the NEO-Personality Inventory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After an exploratory factor analysis, which used a total of 137 responses on 33 items, 15 items were left for confirmatory factor analysis. A total of 118 responses were available for the confirmatory factor analysis. Model fitness was tested using tests for exact fitness and fit indices such as the goodness of fit index (GFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and standardised root mean squared residual (SRMR). An acceptable fit was found for 11 items divided over three factors: 'self-perceived skill', 'tension' and 'dedication'. These 11 items did not converge with the neuroticism scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed the development steps and initial validation of a psychometric instrument, the Amsterdam Self-Efficacy Scale for Tooth Removal (ASES-TR), consisting of 11 items for testing dental students' self-efficacy in performing tooth removal procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amsterdam Self-Efficacy Scale for Tooth Removal (ASES-TR).\",\"authors\":\"Maaike G Beuling, Jason Nak, Jens Kober, Jean Pierre T F Ho, Jan de Lange, Raoul P P P Grasman, Tom C T van Riet\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eje.70007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a questionnaire on dental students' self-efficacy with tooth removal, suitable for measuring the effectiveness of training methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To prepare and validate this questionnaire, we used the Association of Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) stepwise guide for developing questionnaires for educational research. In the validation process, our study group conducted two pilot studies, the first for an exploratory factor analysis and the second for a confirmatory factor analysis. In addition, the questionnaire was tested for convergence with the neuroticism subscale of the NEO-Personality Inventory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After an exploratory factor analysis, which used a total of 137 responses on 33 items, 15 items were left for confirmatory factor analysis. A total of 118 responses were available for the confirmatory factor analysis. Model fitness was tested using tests for exact fitness and fit indices such as the goodness of fit index (GFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and standardised root mean squared residual (SRMR). An acceptable fit was found for 11 items divided over three factors: 'self-perceived skill', 'tension' and 'dedication'. These 11 items did not converge with the neuroticism scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed the development steps and initial validation of a psychometric instrument, the Amsterdam Self-Efficacy Scale for Tooth Removal (ASES-TR), consisting of 11 items for testing dental students' self-efficacy in performing tooth removal procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Dental Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Dental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.70007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.70007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:编制并验证一份关于牙科学生拔牙自我效能感的问卷,用于衡量培训方法的有效性。方法:采用欧洲医学教育协会(AMEE)分步编制教育研究问卷指南,编制并验证本问卷。在验证过程中,我们的研究组进行了两个先导研究,第一个用于探索性因素分析,第二个用于验证性因素分析。并与新人格量表神经质量表进行收敛性检验。结果:经过探索性因子分析,共使用137个回答,共33个项目,留下15个项目进行验证性因子分析。共有118份回复可用于验证性因子分析。采用拟合优度指数(GFI)、近似均方根误差(RMSEA)和标准化均方根残差(SRMR)等精确适应度和拟合指标检验模型适应度。有11个项目被分为三个因素:“自我感觉的技能”、“紧张感”和“奉献精神”。这11项与神经质量表不一致。结论:本研究显示了一种心理测量工具——阿姆斯特丹拔牙自我效能量表(asas - tr)的开发步骤和初步验证,该量表由11个项目组成,用于测试牙科学生在拔牙过程中的自我效能感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Amsterdam Self-Efficacy Scale for Tooth Removal (ASES-TR).

Objectives: To develop and validate a questionnaire on dental students' self-efficacy with tooth removal, suitable for measuring the effectiveness of training methods.

Methods: To prepare and validate this questionnaire, we used the Association of Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) stepwise guide for developing questionnaires for educational research. In the validation process, our study group conducted two pilot studies, the first for an exploratory factor analysis and the second for a confirmatory factor analysis. In addition, the questionnaire was tested for convergence with the neuroticism subscale of the NEO-Personality Inventory.

Results: After an exploratory factor analysis, which used a total of 137 responses on 33 items, 15 items were left for confirmatory factor analysis. A total of 118 responses were available for the confirmatory factor analysis. Model fitness was tested using tests for exact fitness and fit indices such as the goodness of fit index (GFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and standardised root mean squared residual (SRMR). An acceptable fit was found for 11 items divided over three factors: 'self-perceived skill', 'tension' and 'dedication'. These 11 items did not converge with the neuroticism scale.

Conclusion: This study showed the development steps and initial validation of a psychometric instrument, the Amsterdam Self-Efficacy Scale for Tooth Removal (ASES-TR), consisting of 11 items for testing dental students' self-efficacy in performing tooth removal procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the European Journal of Dental Education is to publish original topical and review articles of the highest quality in the field of Dental Education. The Journal seeks to disseminate widely the latest information on curriculum development teaching methodologies assessment techniques and quality assurance in the fields of dental undergraduate and postgraduate education and dental auxiliary personnel training. The scope includes the dental educational aspects of the basic medical sciences the behavioural sciences the interface with medical education information technology and distance learning and educational audit. Papers embodying the results of high-quality educational research of relevance to dentistry are particularly encouraged as are evidence-based reports of novel and established educational programmes and their outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信