换位思考与自我反思之家的三扇门——健康教育导览式叙述者探索的经验。

IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jussi Valtonen, Elina Renko
{"title":"换位思考与自我反思之家的三扇门——健康教育导览式叙述者探索的经验。","authors":"Jussi Valtonen, Elina Renko","doi":"10.1007/s10459-025-10450-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior research shows that writing interventions can foster perspective-taking, the ability to imagine how other people would experience things. An aspect that is not well understood concerns the experienced effects of such writing for healthcare practitioners. How do clinicians experience the relevance and effects of personal reflective/creative writing from different points of view for their clinical practice? To investigate clinicians' experienced effects of personal writing on perspective-taking and ethical patient-centered practice, we administered weekly writing interventions to healthcare and social work professionals over a 7-week course that followed the narrative medicine model. We guided participants to explore three narrator choices in their personal writing: The autobiographical first person; the autobiographical third person; and the fictional first person (i.e., a patient's/client's POV). Interviews with course participants (n = 14), analyzed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis, generated three themes reflecting experienced effects of personal writing from different points of view: (1) The familiar seen in a new light, the experience that the writing helped participants to see their clinical work and their own role with new acuity; (2) Transformations of emotions and relationships through the reframing and reinterpretation of experienced events, experienced changes in perspective and reoriented interpretations of clinical encounters and relationships; and (3) Questioning the objectivity of one's observations and assumptions, questions related to epistemic humility inspired by the writing. The results illustrate the experienced relevance of personal reflective/creative writing for healthcare practitioners and show that narrator choice is relevant for the experienced effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three doors to the house of perspective-taking and self-reflection: Experiences of guided narrator exploration for healthcare education.\",\"authors\":\"Jussi Valtonen, Elina Renko\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10459-025-10450-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prior research shows that writing interventions can foster perspective-taking, the ability to imagine how other people would experience things. An aspect that is not well understood concerns the experienced effects of such writing for healthcare practitioners. How do clinicians experience the relevance and effects of personal reflective/creative writing from different points of view for their clinical practice? To investigate clinicians' experienced effects of personal writing on perspective-taking and ethical patient-centered practice, we administered weekly writing interventions to healthcare and social work professionals over a 7-week course that followed the narrative medicine model. We guided participants to explore three narrator choices in their personal writing: The autobiographical first person; the autobiographical third person; and the fictional first person (i.e., a patient's/client's POV). Interviews with course participants (n = 14), analyzed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis, generated three themes reflecting experienced effects of personal writing from different points of view: (1) The familiar seen in a new light, the experience that the writing helped participants to see their clinical work and their own role with new acuity; (2) Transformations of emotions and relationships through the reframing and reinterpretation of experienced events, experienced changes in perspective and reoriented interpretations of clinical encounters and relationships; and (3) Questioning the objectivity of one's observations and assumptions, questions related to epistemic humility inspired by the writing. The results illustrate the experienced relevance of personal reflective/creative writing for healthcare practitioners and show that narrator choice is relevant for the experienced effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Health Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Health Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10450-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10450-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究表明,写作干预可以培养换位思考的能力,即想象别人会如何经历事情的能力。一个方面,是不太清楚的关切,这种写作经验的影响,为医疗从业人员。临床医生如何从临床实践的不同角度体验个人反思/创造性写作的相关性和效果?为了调查临床医生对个人写作对换位思考和以病人为中心的道德实践的影响,我们对医疗保健和社会工作专业人员进行了为期7周的写作干预,这些课程遵循叙事医学模型。我们引导参与者在他们的个人写作中探索三种叙述者的选择:自传体第一人称;自传体第三人称;以及虚构的第一人称(即患者/客户的视角)。对课程参与者的访谈(n = 14)采用归纳反身性主题分析法进行分析,得出三个主题,从不同的角度反映了个人写作的体验效果:(1)以新的视角看待熟悉的事物,写作帮助参与者以新的敏切度看待临床工作和自身角色的体验;(2)通过对经历事件的重构和重新解释、经历的视角变化和对临床遭遇和关系的重新定向解释来实现情绪和关系的转变;(3)质疑个人观察和假设的客观性,这些问题与受写作启发的认知谦卑有关。结果说明了个人反思/创造性写作对医疗从业人员的经验相关性,并表明叙述者的选择与经验效果相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three doors to the house of perspective-taking and self-reflection: Experiences of guided narrator exploration for healthcare education.

Prior research shows that writing interventions can foster perspective-taking, the ability to imagine how other people would experience things. An aspect that is not well understood concerns the experienced effects of such writing for healthcare practitioners. How do clinicians experience the relevance and effects of personal reflective/creative writing from different points of view for their clinical practice? To investigate clinicians' experienced effects of personal writing on perspective-taking and ethical patient-centered practice, we administered weekly writing interventions to healthcare and social work professionals over a 7-week course that followed the narrative medicine model. We guided participants to explore three narrator choices in their personal writing: The autobiographical first person; the autobiographical third person; and the fictional first person (i.e., a patient's/client's POV). Interviews with course participants (n = 14), analyzed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis, generated three themes reflecting experienced effects of personal writing from different points of view: (1) The familiar seen in a new light, the experience that the writing helped participants to see their clinical work and their own role with new acuity; (2) Transformations of emotions and relationships through the reframing and reinterpretation of experienced events, experienced changes in perspective and reoriented interpretations of clinical encounters and relationships; and (3) Questioning the objectivity of one's observations and assumptions, questions related to epistemic humility inspired by the writing. The results illustrate the experienced relevance of personal reflective/creative writing for healthcare practitioners and show that narrator choice is relevant for the experienced effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信