横断面研究:新一代测序在三级重症监护病房的诊断准确性。

IF 1.5 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Mihika Sawale, Rishabh Raj, Mugdha Bhide, Gunjan Chanchalani
{"title":"横断面研究:新一代测序在三级重症监护病房的诊断准确性。","authors":"Mihika Sawale, Rishabh Raj, Mugdha Bhide, Gunjan Chanchalani","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Infectious diseases are a major cause of intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, where rapid pathogen identification is crucial. Traditional culture methods are slow and may miss fastidious organisms. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers rapid, comprehensive pathogen detection. This study assessed NGS accuracy compared to culture in a tertiary care ICU in India.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective observational analysis of 187 ICU patients with suspected infections was conducted with IRB approval. Paired samples from blood, urine, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and other body fluids underwent NGS and culture testing. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using culture as the reference. Concordance was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Next-generation sequencing demonstrated a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 59.6%, PPV of 62.23%, and NPV of 72.84%. It detected pathogens in 56.68% of cases vs 47.06% by culture, identifying 17 atypical organisms in culture-negative cases. Sensitivity was highest in CSF (100%) and BALF (87.5%), while specificity was highest in pleural fluid (100%) and blood (87.5%). Overall concordance was 57.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Next-generation sequencing has improved pathogen detection, identifying organisms missed by culture. High sensitivity across sample types suggests its value in ICU diagnostics. However, lower specificity, high cost, and standardization challenges limit standalone use.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Next-generation sequencing facilitates an earlier ICU infection diagnosis, allowing for prompt targeted treatment and potentially reducing antimicrobial resistance. However, false positives and cost remain barriers. Combining NGS with conventional culture techniques could improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes in the right subset of patients.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Sawale M, Raj R, Bhide M, Chanchalani G. Cross-sectional Study: Diagnostic Accuracy of Next-generation Sequencing in a Tertiary Care Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(6):498-503.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"29 6","pages":"498-503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-sectional Study: Diagnostic Accuracy of Next-generation Sequencing in a Tertiary Care Intensive Care Unit.\",\"authors\":\"Mihika Sawale, Rishabh Raj, Mugdha Bhide, Gunjan Chanchalani\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Infectious diseases are a major cause of intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, where rapid pathogen identification is crucial. Traditional culture methods are slow and may miss fastidious organisms. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers rapid, comprehensive pathogen detection. This study assessed NGS accuracy compared to culture in a tertiary care ICU in India.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective observational analysis of 187 ICU patients with suspected infections was conducted with IRB approval. Paired samples from blood, urine, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and other body fluids underwent NGS and culture testing. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using culture as the reference. Concordance was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Next-generation sequencing demonstrated a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 59.6%, PPV of 62.23%, and NPV of 72.84%. It detected pathogens in 56.68% of cases vs 47.06% by culture, identifying 17 atypical organisms in culture-negative cases. Sensitivity was highest in CSF (100%) and BALF (87.5%), while specificity was highest in pleural fluid (100%) and blood (87.5%). Overall concordance was 57.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Next-generation sequencing has improved pathogen detection, identifying organisms missed by culture. High sensitivity across sample types suggests its value in ICU diagnostics. However, lower specificity, high cost, and standardization challenges limit standalone use.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Next-generation sequencing facilitates an earlier ICU infection diagnosis, allowing for prompt targeted treatment and potentially reducing antimicrobial resistance. However, false positives and cost remain barriers. Combining NGS with conventional culture techniques could improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes in the right subset of patients.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Sawale M, Raj R, Bhide M, Chanchalani G. Cross-sectional Study: Diagnostic Accuracy of Next-generation Sequencing in a Tertiary Care Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(6):498-503.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"498-503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186076/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24987\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:传染病是重症监护病房(ICU)死亡的主要原因,其中快速鉴定病原体至关重要。传统的培养方法是缓慢的,可能会错过挑剔的有机体。下一代测序(NGS)提供快速、全面的病原体检测。本研究评估了印度三级护理ICU中NGS与培养的准确性。患者和方法:经IRB批准,对187例ICU疑似感染患者进行回顾性观察分析。血液、尿液、支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)、脑脊液(CSF)和其他体液的配对样本进行了NGS和培养试验。以培养物为参照,计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。同时对一致性进行评估。结果:新一代测序的敏感性为75%,特异性为59.6%,PPV为62.23%,NPV为72.84%。病原菌检出率为56.68%,培养检出率为47.06%,培养阴性病例中检出非典型菌17种。CSF(100%)和BALF(87.5%)敏感性最高,而胸膜液(100%)和血液(87.5%)特异性最高。总体一致性为57.2%。结论:新一代测序技术提高了病原菌的检测水平,能够识别培养中遗漏的微生物。样品类型的高灵敏度表明其在ICU诊断中的价值。然而,低特异性、高成本和标准化挑战限制了独立使用。临床意义:下一代测序有助于早期ICU感染诊断,允许及时靶向治疗,并可能减少抗菌素耐药性。然而,误报和成本仍然是障碍。将NGS与传统培养技术相结合可以提高诊断准确性和患者预后。sawaale M, Raj R, Bhide M, Chanchalani G.新一代测序在三级监护病房诊断准确性的横断面研究。中华检验医学杂志;2015;29(6):498-503。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cross-sectional Study: Diagnostic Accuracy of Next-generation Sequencing in a Tertiary Care Intensive Care Unit.

Cross-sectional Study: Diagnostic Accuracy of Next-generation Sequencing in a Tertiary Care Intensive Care Unit.

Cross-sectional Study: Diagnostic Accuracy of Next-generation Sequencing in a Tertiary Care Intensive Care Unit.

Background and aims: Infectious diseases are a major cause of intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, where rapid pathogen identification is crucial. Traditional culture methods are slow and may miss fastidious organisms. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers rapid, comprehensive pathogen detection. This study assessed NGS accuracy compared to culture in a tertiary care ICU in India.

Patients and methods: A retrospective observational analysis of 187 ICU patients with suspected infections was conducted with IRB approval. Paired samples from blood, urine, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and other body fluids underwent NGS and culture testing. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using culture as the reference. Concordance was also assessed.

Results: Next-generation sequencing demonstrated a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 59.6%, PPV of 62.23%, and NPV of 72.84%. It detected pathogens in 56.68% of cases vs 47.06% by culture, identifying 17 atypical organisms in culture-negative cases. Sensitivity was highest in CSF (100%) and BALF (87.5%), while specificity was highest in pleural fluid (100%) and blood (87.5%). Overall concordance was 57.2%.

Conclusion: Next-generation sequencing has improved pathogen detection, identifying organisms missed by culture. High sensitivity across sample types suggests its value in ICU diagnostics. However, lower specificity, high cost, and standardization challenges limit standalone use.

Clinical significance: Next-generation sequencing facilitates an earlier ICU infection diagnosis, allowing for prompt targeted treatment and potentially reducing antimicrobial resistance. However, false positives and cost remain barriers. Combining NGS with conventional culture techniques could improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes in the right subset of patients.

How to cite this article: Sawale M, Raj R, Bhide M, Chanchalani G. Cross-sectional Study: Diagnostic Accuracy of Next-generation Sequencing in a Tertiary Care Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(6):498-503.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信