尼泊尔Bardiya地区农民安全使用农药的知识和做法:一项横断面研究。

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health Research Pub Date : 2025-06-24 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1177/22799036251350211
Rajesh Karki, Naresh Tharu, Maheshor Kaphle
{"title":"尼泊尔Bardiya地区农民安全使用农药的知识和做法:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Rajesh Karki, Naresh Tharu, Maheshor Kaphle","doi":"10.1177/22799036251350211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Improper pesticide handling poses immediate and long-term health risks. This is particularly true in developing countries, where these chemicals are often used with minimal protection. This study aimed to assess farmers' knowledge and practices regarding safe pesticide use in Nepal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among 287 farmers in Rajapur Municipality, Nepal, in 2024. The respondents were selected using systematic random sampling. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a validated questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize categorical variables, Pearson's correlation was used to analyze the relationship between knowledge and practice, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify significant factors associated with adequate knowledge and practice (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents had a mean age of 42.1 years (SD ± 10.8). Most farmers (86.8%) demonstrated adequate overall practices. However, only 2.1% used a complete set of personal protective equipment, 97.9% prepared pesticides in the field, and only 5.2% received training, indicating critical gaps in safe practice. Similarly, only 34.5% of respondents had adequate knowledge, particularly farmers' knowledge of reading instructions (20.2%), and symptom recognition (21.3%) was poor. A moderate positive correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.458, <i>p</i> < 0.001) was observed between knowledge and practice. Factors significantly associated with knowledge included years of pesticide use, social media exposure, and training. Ethnicity and family type were associated with adequate practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite adequate overall practices, significant knowledge gaps and poor safety practices were identified. Targeted educational interventions and training programs are crucial to enhance knowledge and promote safe behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"14 2","pages":"22799036251350211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and practices regarding safe pesticide use among farmers in the Bardiya District, Nepal: A cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Rajesh Karki, Naresh Tharu, Maheshor Kaphle\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22799036251350211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Improper pesticide handling poses immediate and long-term health risks. This is particularly true in developing countries, where these chemicals are often used with minimal protection. This study aimed to assess farmers' knowledge and practices regarding safe pesticide use in Nepal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among 287 farmers in Rajapur Municipality, Nepal, in 2024. The respondents were selected using systematic random sampling. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a validated questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize categorical variables, Pearson's correlation was used to analyze the relationship between knowledge and practice, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify significant factors associated with adequate knowledge and practice (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents had a mean age of 42.1 years (SD ± 10.8). Most farmers (86.8%) demonstrated adequate overall practices. However, only 2.1% used a complete set of personal protective equipment, 97.9% prepared pesticides in the field, and only 5.2% received training, indicating critical gaps in safe practice. Similarly, only 34.5% of respondents had adequate knowledge, particularly farmers' knowledge of reading instructions (20.2%), and symptom recognition (21.3%) was poor. A moderate positive correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.458, <i>p</i> < 0.001) was observed between knowledge and practice. Factors significantly associated with knowledge included years of pesticide use, social media exposure, and training. Ethnicity and family type were associated with adequate practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite adequate overall practices, significant knowledge gaps and poor safety practices were identified. Targeted educational interventions and training programs are crucial to enhance knowledge and promote safe behaviors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Research\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"22799036251350211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188041/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036251350211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036251350211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:不当的农药处理会造成即时和长期的健康风险。在发展中国家尤其如此,在这些国家,这些化学品的使用往往没有什么保护。本研究旨在评估尼泊尔农民关于安全使用农药的知识和做法。方法:对尼泊尔拉贾布尔市287名农民于2024年进行了横断面研究。调查对象采用系统随机抽样的方式进行选择。数据收集通过面对面访谈使用有效的问卷。采用描述性统计对分类变量进行总结,采用Pearson相关分析知识与实践的关系,采用多因素logistic回归分析知识与实践是否充足的相关因素(p)。结果:受访患者平均年龄为42.1岁(SD±10.8)。大多数农民(86.8%)表现出适当的总体做法。然而,只有2.1%的人使用了全套个人防护装备,97.9%的人在田间配制农药,只有5.2%的人接受过培训,表明安全实践存在严重差距。同样,只有34.5%的受访者有足够的知识,特别是农民的阅读说明知识(20.2%),症状识别(21.3%)较差。中度正相关(r = 0.458, p)结论:尽管有充分的总体实践,但仍存在显著的知识差距和较差的安全实践。有针对性的教育干预和培训计划对于增强知识和促进安全行为至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge and practices regarding safe pesticide use among farmers in the Bardiya District, Nepal: A cross-sectional study.

Introduction: Improper pesticide handling poses immediate and long-term health risks. This is particularly true in developing countries, where these chemicals are often used with minimal protection. This study aimed to assess farmers' knowledge and practices regarding safe pesticide use in Nepal.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 287 farmers in Rajapur Municipality, Nepal, in 2024. The respondents were selected using systematic random sampling. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a validated questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize categorical variables, Pearson's correlation was used to analyze the relationship between knowledge and practice, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify significant factors associated with adequate knowledge and practice (p < 0.05).

Results: Respondents had a mean age of 42.1 years (SD ± 10.8). Most farmers (86.8%) demonstrated adequate overall practices. However, only 2.1% used a complete set of personal protective equipment, 97.9% prepared pesticides in the field, and only 5.2% received training, indicating critical gaps in safe practice. Similarly, only 34.5% of respondents had adequate knowledge, particularly farmers' knowledge of reading instructions (20.2%), and symptom recognition (21.3%) was poor. A moderate positive correlation (r = 0.458, p < 0.001) was observed between knowledge and practice. Factors significantly associated with knowledge included years of pesticide use, social media exposure, and training. Ethnicity and family type were associated with adequate practices.

Conclusion: Despite adequate overall practices, significant knowledge gaps and poor safety practices were identified. Targeted educational interventions and training programs are crucial to enhance knowledge and promote safe behaviors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Research
Journal of Public Health Research PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信