{"title":"血清骨膜蛋白和癌胚抗原对变应性支气管肺曲霉病的诊断和评价。","authors":"Renu Sah, Valliappan Muthu, Parul Kamboj, Arnab Pal, Shivaprakash M Rudramurthy, Sahajal Dhooria, Inderpaul Singh Sehgal, Kuruswamy Thurai Prasad, Mandeep Garg, Ashutosh N Aggarwal, Ritesh Agarwal","doi":"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_32_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Serum periostin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are markers of type 2 inflammation. However, their role in diagnosing and monitoring treatment responses in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) remains uncertain. The objective of the study was to assess the diagnostic performance of serum CEA and periostin in distinguishing ABPA from asthma. We also evaluate their usefulness in monitoring treatment responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled consecutive subjects with ABPA (cases) and asthmatic patients without ABPA (controls). Serum periostin and CEA levels were measured at baseline and again 2 months after oral prednisolone. We constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and determined sensitivity and specificity using the optimal cut-off derived from Youden's index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 112 and 108 subjects with ABPA and asthma (median age: 34 years) respectively. At baseline, the median serum periostin (22.03 vs 16.36 ng/mL; P < 0.001) and CEA levels (4.80 vs 2.35 ng/mL; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the ABPA group than in the controls. CEA (AUROC = 0.77) showed better diagnostic accuracy than serum periostin (AUROC = 0.64) in differentiating asthma from ABPA. After 2 months of treatment, median serum CEA (4.8 ng/mL vs 3.7 ng/mL) and periostin levels (22.03 vs 17.74 ng/mL) declined significantly. However, 34% and 30% of subjects exhibited increased periostin and CEA levels following treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While serum CEA and periostin exhibit modest diagnostic performance in differentiating ABPA from asthma, they are suboptimal for monitoring treatment responses. Further studies are required to validate our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47462,"journal":{"name":"Lung India","volume":"42 4","pages":"309-314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serum periostin and carcinoembryonic antigen for diagnosing and assessing response in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.\",\"authors\":\"Renu Sah, Valliappan Muthu, Parul Kamboj, Arnab Pal, Shivaprakash M Rudramurthy, Sahajal Dhooria, Inderpaul Singh Sehgal, Kuruswamy Thurai Prasad, Mandeep Garg, Ashutosh N Aggarwal, Ritesh Agarwal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_32_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Serum periostin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are markers of type 2 inflammation. However, their role in diagnosing and monitoring treatment responses in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) remains uncertain. The objective of the study was to assess the diagnostic performance of serum CEA and periostin in distinguishing ABPA from asthma. We also evaluate their usefulness in monitoring treatment responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled consecutive subjects with ABPA (cases) and asthmatic patients without ABPA (controls). Serum periostin and CEA levels were measured at baseline and again 2 months after oral prednisolone. We constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and determined sensitivity and specificity using the optimal cut-off derived from Youden's index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 112 and 108 subjects with ABPA and asthma (median age: 34 years) respectively. At baseline, the median serum periostin (22.03 vs 16.36 ng/mL; P < 0.001) and CEA levels (4.80 vs 2.35 ng/mL; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the ABPA group than in the controls. CEA (AUROC = 0.77) showed better diagnostic accuracy than serum periostin (AUROC = 0.64) in differentiating asthma from ABPA. After 2 months of treatment, median serum CEA (4.8 ng/mL vs 3.7 ng/mL) and periostin levels (22.03 vs 17.74 ng/mL) declined significantly. However, 34% and 30% of subjects exhibited increased periostin and CEA levels following treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While serum CEA and periostin exhibit modest diagnostic performance in differentiating ABPA from asthma, they are suboptimal for monitoring treatment responses. Further studies are required to validate our findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung India\",\"volume\":\"42 4\",\"pages\":\"309-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342213/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_32_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_32_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的:血清骨膜蛋白和癌胚抗原(CEA)是2型炎症的标志物。然而,它们在过敏性支气管肺曲霉病(ABPA)的诊断和治疗反应监测中的作用仍不确定。本研究的目的是评估血清CEA和骨膜蛋白在鉴别ABPA和哮喘中的诊断作用。我们还评估了它们在监测治疗反应方面的有用性。方法:连续招募ABPA患者(病例)和无ABPA的哮喘患者(对照组)。在基线和口服强的松龙2个月后再次测量血清骨膜蛋白和CEA水平。我们构建了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并使用由约登指数得出的最佳截止值确定了灵敏度和特异性。结果:我们分别纳入112例和108例ABPA和哮喘患者(中位年龄:34岁)。基线时,血清骨膜素中位数(22.03 vs 16.36 ng/mL;P < 0.001)和CEA水平(4.80 vs 2.35 ng/mL;P < 0.001), ABPA组显著高于对照组。CEA (AUROC = 0.77)对哮喘与ABPA的鉴别诊断准确率高于血清骨膜蛋白(AUROC = 0.64)。治疗2个月后,血清CEA中位数(4.8 ng/mL vs 3.7 ng/mL)和骨膜素水平(22.03 vs 17.74 ng/mL)显著下降。然而,34%和30%的受试者在治疗后表现出骨膜蛋白和CEA水平升高。结论:虽然血清CEA和骨膜蛋白在鉴别ABPA与哮喘方面表现出适度的诊断作用,但它们在监测治疗反应方面并不理想。需要进一步的研究来验证我们的发现。
Serum periostin and carcinoembryonic antigen for diagnosing and assessing response in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.
Background and objective: Serum periostin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are markers of type 2 inflammation. However, their role in diagnosing and monitoring treatment responses in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) remains uncertain. The objective of the study was to assess the diagnostic performance of serum CEA and periostin in distinguishing ABPA from asthma. We also evaluate their usefulness in monitoring treatment responses.
Methods: We enrolled consecutive subjects with ABPA (cases) and asthmatic patients without ABPA (controls). Serum periostin and CEA levels were measured at baseline and again 2 months after oral prednisolone. We constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and determined sensitivity and specificity using the optimal cut-off derived from Youden's index.
Results: We enrolled 112 and 108 subjects with ABPA and asthma (median age: 34 years) respectively. At baseline, the median serum periostin (22.03 vs 16.36 ng/mL; P < 0.001) and CEA levels (4.80 vs 2.35 ng/mL; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the ABPA group than in the controls. CEA (AUROC = 0.77) showed better diagnostic accuracy than serum periostin (AUROC = 0.64) in differentiating asthma from ABPA. After 2 months of treatment, median serum CEA (4.8 ng/mL vs 3.7 ng/mL) and periostin levels (22.03 vs 17.74 ng/mL) declined significantly. However, 34% and 30% of subjects exhibited increased periostin and CEA levels following treatment.
Conclusion: While serum CEA and periostin exhibit modest diagnostic performance in differentiating ABPA from asthma, they are suboptimal for monitoring treatment responses. Further studies are required to validate our findings.