Connor Luke Allen, Luke Muschialli, Åsa Nihlén, Anna Coates, Lianne M Gonsalves
{"title":"跨性别者和性别多样化者在性健康和生殖健康方面面临的障碍:系统回顾。","authors":"Connor Luke Allen, Luke Muschialli, Åsa Nihlén, Anna Coates, Lianne M Gonsalves","doi":"10.1186/s12978-025-02038-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transgender (trans) and gender diverse people face significant obstacles when accessing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. This review aims to systematically identify and characterise the specific barriers to SRH barriers across a range of service domains.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was carried across MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo and Global Index Medicus for studies published up until Aug 17, 2023. We included qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies that illustrated which barriers to SRH services trans and gender diverse people face. Relevant data were extracted and examined using an inductive approach by which organic themes emerged across the SRH service domains. Quality assessment was carried out using the Critical Appraisal Skill Programme (CASP) checklists.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 53 studies examining barriers to SRH services were deemed eligible for inclusion. This consisted of 20 studies relating to fertility care, two to abortion care, four to contraception, 15 to reproductive cancer screening, nine to antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal care and three spanning multiple domains of SRH. Eight studies were deemed to be moderate quality, the remaining 45 were high quality. 49 of the included studies were conducted exclusively in high-income countries. 40 studies were conducted from the perspectives of trans and gender diverse people, 10 from that of health providers whilst three incorporated both. Participants included for analysis ranged in age from 18 to 78 years. Domain specific and cross-cutting barriers were described throughout the included studies, including financial accessibility, lack of provider knowledge and education, limited information availability, systemic and interpersonal discrimination, cis-normative and gender biased health system practices and dysphoria associated with treatments and procedures.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Trans and gender diverse people face substantial barriers to SRH services that prohibit them from fully exercising their reproductive rights. The evidence collated by this review demonstrates that whilst some barriers are shared with cisgender women, trans and gender diverse people face unique barriers to accessing SRH services. Both systems- and individual-level reform is necessary to improve not only gender responsiveness but also gender-inclusivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":"22 1","pages":"115"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to sexual and reproductive health care faced by transgender and gender diverse people: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Connor Luke Allen, Luke Muschialli, Åsa Nihlén, Anna Coates, Lianne M Gonsalves\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12978-025-02038-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transgender (trans) and gender diverse people face significant obstacles when accessing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. This review aims to systematically identify and characterise the specific barriers to SRH barriers across a range of service domains.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was carried across MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo and Global Index Medicus for studies published up until Aug 17, 2023. We included qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies that illustrated which barriers to SRH services trans and gender diverse people face. Relevant data were extracted and examined using an inductive approach by which organic themes emerged across the SRH service domains. Quality assessment was carried out using the Critical Appraisal Skill Programme (CASP) checklists.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 53 studies examining barriers to SRH services were deemed eligible for inclusion. This consisted of 20 studies relating to fertility care, two to abortion care, four to contraception, 15 to reproductive cancer screening, nine to antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal care and three spanning multiple domains of SRH. Eight studies were deemed to be moderate quality, the remaining 45 were high quality. 49 of the included studies were conducted exclusively in high-income countries. 40 studies were conducted from the perspectives of trans and gender diverse people, 10 from that of health providers whilst three incorporated both. Participants included for analysis ranged in age from 18 to 78 years. Domain specific and cross-cutting barriers were described throughout the included studies, including financial accessibility, lack of provider knowledge and education, limited information availability, systemic and interpersonal discrimination, cis-normative and gender biased health system practices and dysphoria associated with treatments and procedures.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Trans and gender diverse people face substantial barriers to SRH services that prohibit them from fully exercising their reproductive rights. The evidence collated by this review demonstrates that whilst some barriers are shared with cisgender women, trans and gender diverse people face unique barriers to accessing SRH services. Both systems- and individual-level reform is necessary to improve not only gender responsiveness but also gender-inclusivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Health\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188679/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-025-02038-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-025-02038-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:跨性别者(trans)和性别多样化者在获得性健康和生殖健康服务时面临重大障碍。本综述旨在系统地识别和描述跨一系列服务领域的SRH障碍的具体障碍。方法:系统检索MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase、PsycInfo和Global Index Medicus,检索截至2023年8月17日已发表的研究。我们纳入了定性、定量和混合方法的研究,这些研究说明了变性人和性别多样化的人在获得性健康和生殖健康服务时面临的障碍。使用归纳方法提取和检查相关数据,通过该方法,有机主题出现在SRH服务领域。使用关键评估技能计划(CASP)清单进行质量评估。研究结果:总共有53项研究检查了性生殖健康服务的障碍,被认为符合纳入条件。这包括20项与生育护理有关的研究,2项与堕胎护理有关,4项与避孕有关,15项与生殖癌症筛查有关,9项与产前、产时和产后护理有关,3项涉及生殖健康的多个领域。8项研究被认为是中等质量,其余45项为高质量。纳入的研究中有49项完全在高收入国家进行。从跨性别者和性别多样化者的角度进行了40项研究,从保健提供者的角度进行了10项研究,同时将两者结合起来进行了3项研究。纳入分析的参与者年龄从18岁到78岁不等。在所有纳入的研究中都描述了特定领域和跨领域的障碍,包括经济可及性、缺乏提供者知识和教育、有限的信息可得性、系统和人际歧视、顺式规范和性别偏见的卫生系统做法以及与治疗和程序相关的焦虑。解释:跨性别者和性别多样化者在获得性健康和生殖健康服务方面面临巨大障碍,这些障碍使他们无法充分行使其生殖权利。本综述整理的证据表明,虽然一些障碍与顺性妇女相同,但变性人和性别多样化的人在获得性健康和生殖健康服务方面面临独特的障碍。系统和个人层面的改革对于提高性别反应能力和性别包容性都是必要的。
Barriers to sexual and reproductive health care faced by transgender and gender diverse people: a systematic review.
Background: Transgender (trans) and gender diverse people face significant obstacles when accessing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. This review aims to systematically identify and characterise the specific barriers to SRH barriers across a range of service domains.
Methods: A systematic literature search was carried across MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo and Global Index Medicus for studies published up until Aug 17, 2023. We included qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies that illustrated which barriers to SRH services trans and gender diverse people face. Relevant data were extracted and examined using an inductive approach by which organic themes emerged across the SRH service domains. Quality assessment was carried out using the Critical Appraisal Skill Programme (CASP) checklists.
Findings: A total of 53 studies examining barriers to SRH services were deemed eligible for inclusion. This consisted of 20 studies relating to fertility care, two to abortion care, four to contraception, 15 to reproductive cancer screening, nine to antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal care and three spanning multiple domains of SRH. Eight studies were deemed to be moderate quality, the remaining 45 were high quality. 49 of the included studies were conducted exclusively in high-income countries. 40 studies were conducted from the perspectives of trans and gender diverse people, 10 from that of health providers whilst three incorporated both. Participants included for analysis ranged in age from 18 to 78 years. Domain specific and cross-cutting barriers were described throughout the included studies, including financial accessibility, lack of provider knowledge and education, limited information availability, systemic and interpersonal discrimination, cis-normative and gender biased health system practices and dysphoria associated with treatments and procedures.
Interpretation: Trans and gender diverse people face substantial barriers to SRH services that prohibit them from fully exercising their reproductive rights. The evidence collated by this review demonstrates that whilst some barriers are shared with cisgender women, trans and gender diverse people face unique barriers to accessing SRH services. Both systems- and individual-level reform is necessary to improve not only gender responsiveness but also gender-inclusivity.
期刊介绍:
Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access.
Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.