未充分调查和低估:美国成人样本中厕所和卫生不安全的差异。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Neurourology and Urodynamics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-25 DOI:10.1002/nau.70109
William Furuyama, Roger Dmochowski, Elisabeth Sebesta
{"title":"未充分调查和低估:美国成人样本中厕所和卫生不安全的差异。","authors":"William Furuyama, Roger Dmochowski, Elisabeth Sebesta","doi":"10.1002/nau.70109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most estimates of toilet and sanitation access in the United States rely on limited data from the US Census that examine the presence or absence of plumbing. This study aims to understand the prevalence of toilet and sanitation insecurity using a broader definition that considers issues of accessibility and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited from an electronic research database between September 2021 and January 2022 and identified participants at risk for toilet and sanitation insecurity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 4218 participants completed the study and 725 (17%) were identified as at-risk for home toilet and sanitation insecurity. The at-risk population was more likely to be younger, be of nonwhite race and ethnicity, live in rural or urban communities, have lower socioeconomic status, have less education, be unemployed, use a septic sewage system, and be non-homeowners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant percentage of people with toilets and plumbing experience home toilet and sanitation insecurity, demonstrating the inadequacy of measures that rely on the presence or absence of plumbing. Methods to estimate toilet and sanitation insecurity should account for accessibility and reliability. Understanding more about those affected by home toilet and sanitation insecurity using this broader definition may also have implications for managing bladder health and urinary symptoms.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This study was not a clinical trial and did not require clinical trial registration.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":"1432-1438"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12319484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Under-Investigated and Underestimated: Disparities in Toilet and Sanitation Insecurity in a Sample of United States Adults.\",\"authors\":\"William Furuyama, Roger Dmochowski, Elisabeth Sebesta\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nau.70109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most estimates of toilet and sanitation access in the United States rely on limited data from the US Census that examine the presence or absence of plumbing. This study aims to understand the prevalence of toilet and sanitation insecurity using a broader definition that considers issues of accessibility and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited from an electronic research database between September 2021 and January 2022 and identified participants at risk for toilet and sanitation insecurity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 4218 participants completed the study and 725 (17%) were identified as at-risk for home toilet and sanitation insecurity. The at-risk population was more likely to be younger, be of nonwhite race and ethnicity, live in rural or urban communities, have lower socioeconomic status, have less education, be unemployed, use a septic sewage system, and be non-homeowners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant percentage of people with toilets and plumbing experience home toilet and sanitation insecurity, demonstrating the inadequacy of measures that rely on the presence or absence of plumbing. Methods to estimate toilet and sanitation insecurity should account for accessibility and reliability. Understanding more about those affected by home toilet and sanitation insecurity using this broader definition may also have implications for managing bladder health and urinary symptoms.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This study was not a clinical trial and did not require clinical trial registration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurourology and Urodynamics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1432-1438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12319484/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurourology and Urodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70109\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70109","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,大多数关于厕所和卫生设施的估计依赖于美国人口普查的有限数据,这些数据检查了管道的存在与否。本研究旨在通过考虑可及性和可靠性问题的更广泛定义来了解厕所和卫生不安全的普遍程度。方法:我们在2021年9月至2022年1月期间从电子研究数据库中招募人员,并确定有厕所和卫生不安全风险的参与者。结果:约4218名参与者完成了研究,其中725人(17%)被确定为家庭厕所和卫生不安全的风险人群。高危人群更可能是年轻人,非白人种族,居住在农村或城市社区,社会经济地位较低,受教育程度较低,失业,使用化粪池污水系统,无房。结论:在有厕所和管道的人群中,有相当大比例的人经历过家庭厕所和卫生不安全,这表明依赖于是否有管道的措施是不充分的。估计厕所和卫生不安全的方法应考虑可及性和可靠性。利用这一更广泛的定义,更多地了解那些受家庭厕所和卫生不安全影响的人,也可能对管理膀胱健康和泌尿系统症状产生影响。临床试验注册:本研究不是临床试验,不需要临床试验注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Under-Investigated and Underestimated: Disparities in Toilet and Sanitation Insecurity in a Sample of United States Adults.

Introduction: Most estimates of toilet and sanitation access in the United States rely on limited data from the US Census that examine the presence or absence of plumbing. This study aims to understand the prevalence of toilet and sanitation insecurity using a broader definition that considers issues of accessibility and reliability.

Methods: We recruited from an electronic research database between September 2021 and January 2022 and identified participants at risk for toilet and sanitation insecurity.

Results: About 4218 participants completed the study and 725 (17%) were identified as at-risk for home toilet and sanitation insecurity. The at-risk population was more likely to be younger, be of nonwhite race and ethnicity, live in rural or urban communities, have lower socioeconomic status, have less education, be unemployed, use a septic sewage system, and be non-homeowners.

Conclusions: A significant percentage of people with toilets and plumbing experience home toilet and sanitation insecurity, demonstrating the inadequacy of measures that rely on the presence or absence of plumbing. Methods to estimate toilet and sanitation insecurity should account for accessibility and reliability. Understanding more about those affected by home toilet and sanitation insecurity using this broader definition may also have implications for managing bladder health and urinary symptoms.

Clinical trial registration: This study was not a clinical trial and did not require clinical trial registration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Neurourology and Urodynamics 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurourology and Urodynamics welcomes original scientific contributions from all parts of the world on topics related to urinary tract function, urinary and fecal continence and pelvic floor function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信