静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)发生在住院患者接受预防性无分离肝素每日两次vs.每日三次的系统评价

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Stephanie H Flint, Ashley E Woodruff, Molly K Maloney, Maya R Chilbert
{"title":"静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)发生在住院患者接受预防性无分离肝素每日两次vs.每日三次的系统评价","authors":"Stephanie H Flint, Ashley E Woodruff, Molly K Maloney, Maya R Chilbert","doi":"10.1007/s11239-025-03137-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guidelines recommend 5000U subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UFH) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized adults, but data comparing dosing frequencies is limited. This systematic review aimed to compare VTE and bleeding outcomes between twice daily (BID) and three times daily (TID) UFH regimens. A literature search was completed on 3/7/2024. The primary outcome was VTE occurrence (deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE)). Secondary outcomes included bleeding events. Studies reporting any relevant outcomes were included, while non-human studies, reviews, non-English texts, and high VTE risk populations were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias or Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form. Data were synthesized using Covidence and Excel. After screening, 24 studies were included: 9 observational and 15 randomized studies. Regimens with TID UFH had a 3.1% VTE occurrence (12 studies, n = 145/4653) compared to 4.0% with BID regimens (9 studies, n = 218/5426). Three times daily regimens demonstrated 4.8% DVTs (11 studies, n = 244/5102) and 0.4% PEs (11 studies, n = 24/5372), compared to 9.7% DVTs (11 studies, n = 199/2062) and 0.9% PEs (9 studies, n = 17/1974) with BID regimens. Bleeding events occurred in 3.2% of patients with BID (9 studies, n = 196/6080) and 4.3% with TID regimens (13 studies, n = 393/9044). Three times daily UFH regimens led to fewer VTE, DVT, and PE events but more bleeding compared to BID. Newer data suggests BID dosing may be more appropriate for general medical populations. Limitations include variability in data quality and publication dates. Registered with PROSPERO. No funding was received.</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review of venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurrence in hospitalized patients receiving prophylactic unfractionated heparin twice vs. three times daily.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie H Flint, Ashley E Woodruff, Molly K Maloney, Maya R Chilbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11239-025-03137-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Guidelines recommend 5000U subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UFH) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized adults, but data comparing dosing frequencies is limited. This systematic review aimed to compare VTE and bleeding outcomes between twice daily (BID) and three times daily (TID) UFH regimens. A literature search was completed on 3/7/2024. The primary outcome was VTE occurrence (deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE)). Secondary outcomes included bleeding events. Studies reporting any relevant outcomes were included, while non-human studies, reviews, non-English texts, and high VTE risk populations were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias or Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form. Data were synthesized using Covidence and Excel. After screening, 24 studies were included: 9 observational and 15 randomized studies. Regimens with TID UFH had a 3.1% VTE occurrence (12 studies, n = 145/4653) compared to 4.0% with BID regimens (9 studies, n = 218/5426). Three times daily regimens demonstrated 4.8% DVTs (11 studies, n = 244/5102) and 0.4% PEs (11 studies, n = 24/5372), compared to 9.7% DVTs (11 studies, n = 199/2062) and 0.9% PEs (9 studies, n = 17/1974) with BID regimens. Bleeding events occurred in 3.2% of patients with BID (9 studies, n = 196/6080) and 4.3% with TID regimens (13 studies, n = 393/9044). Three times daily UFH regimens led to fewer VTE, DVT, and PE events but more bleeding compared to BID. Newer data suggests BID dosing may be more appropriate for general medical populations. Limitations include variability in data quality and publication dates. Registered with PROSPERO. No funding was received.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-025-03137-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-025-03137-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

指南推荐5000U皮下未分割肝素(UFH)用于急性住院成人静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)预防,但比较剂量频率的数据有限。本系统综述旨在比较每日两次(BID)和每日三次(TID) UFH方案之间的静脉血栓栓塞和出血结局。文献检索于2024年3月7日完成。主要结局是静脉血栓形成(深静脉血栓形成(DVT)或肺栓塞(PE))。次要结局包括出血事件。报告任何相关结果的研究被纳入,而非人类研究、综述、非英语文本和静脉血栓栓塞高风险人群被排除。偏倚风险采用Cochrane偏倚风险评估表或Newcastle-Ottawa质量评估表进行评估。使用covid和Excel对数据进行综合。筛选后纳入24项研究:9项观察性研究和15项随机研究。TID UFH方案的VTE发生率为3.1%(12项研究,n = 145/4653),而BID方案为4.0%(9项研究,n = 218/5426)。每日三次方案的dvt为4.8%(11项研究,n = 244/5102), pe为0.4%(11项研究,n = 24/5372),而BID方案的dvt为9.7%(11项研究,n = 199/2062), pe为0.9%(9项研究,n = 17/1974)。3.2%的BID患者(9项研究,n = 196/6080)和4.3%的TID患者(13项研究,n = 393/9044)发生了出血事件。与BID相比,每日三次UFH方案可减少静脉血栓栓塞、DVT和PE事件,但出血较多。最新数据表明,BID剂量可能更适合一般医疗人群。限制包括数据质量和出版日期的可变性。在普洛斯彼罗注册。没有收到任何资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic review of venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurrence in hospitalized patients receiving prophylactic unfractionated heparin twice vs. three times daily.

Guidelines recommend 5000U subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UFH) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized adults, but data comparing dosing frequencies is limited. This systematic review aimed to compare VTE and bleeding outcomes between twice daily (BID) and three times daily (TID) UFH regimens. A literature search was completed on 3/7/2024. The primary outcome was VTE occurrence (deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE)). Secondary outcomes included bleeding events. Studies reporting any relevant outcomes were included, while non-human studies, reviews, non-English texts, and high VTE risk populations were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias or Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form. Data were synthesized using Covidence and Excel. After screening, 24 studies were included: 9 observational and 15 randomized studies. Regimens with TID UFH had a 3.1% VTE occurrence (12 studies, n = 145/4653) compared to 4.0% with BID regimens (9 studies, n = 218/5426). Three times daily regimens demonstrated 4.8% DVTs (11 studies, n = 244/5102) and 0.4% PEs (11 studies, n = 24/5372), compared to 9.7% DVTs (11 studies, n = 199/2062) and 0.9% PEs (9 studies, n = 17/1974) with BID regimens. Bleeding events occurred in 3.2% of patients with BID (9 studies, n = 196/6080) and 4.3% with TID regimens (13 studies, n = 393/9044). Three times daily UFH regimens led to fewer VTE, DVT, and PE events but more bleeding compared to BID. Newer data suggests BID dosing may be more appropriate for general medical populations. Limitations include variability in data quality and publication dates. Registered with PROSPERO. No funding was received.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care. The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信