局部晚期低位直肠癌放疗的最佳选择:来自三级癌症中心的短期放疗与长期放化疗的倾向匹配分析

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Tejas Vispute, Devesh S Ballal, Raj Kapadia, Ashwin Desouza, Ankit Sharma, Mufaddal Kazi, Akshay Baheti, Vikas Ostwal, Avanish P Saklani
{"title":"局部晚期低位直肠癌放疗的最佳选择:来自三级癌症中心的短期放疗与长期放化疗的倾向匹配分析","authors":"Tejas Vispute, Devesh S Ballal, Raj Kapadia, Ashwin Desouza, Ankit Sharma, Mufaddal Kazi, Akshay Baheti, Vikas Ostwal, Avanish P Saklani","doi":"10.1002/jso.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare oncological outcomes of short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) versus long-course chemoradiation (LCRT) in patients with low rectal cancer, particularly in a high-volume center with expertise in extended total mesorectal excision (TME).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-institution, retrospective propensity-matched study using a prospectively maintained database. Patients with low rectal cancer (≤ 5 cm from the anal verge) who underwent neoadjuvant radiation (SCRT or LCRT) followed by TME between January 2014 and January 2021 were included. A 3:1 propensity score match was performed based on key clinical variables. Patients with metastatic disease or prior pelvic radiation were excluded. SCRT (25 Gy in 5 fractions) ± chemotherapy was followed by immediate or delayed surgery, while LCRT (50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions) was given with capecitabine ± chemotherapy, followed by surgery. Extended resections were performed as indicated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 466 LCRT and 157 SCRT patients were analyzed. Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) was similar (62% LCRT vs. 64% SCRT, p = 0.8), with no significant differences in overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), pathological complete response (pCR: 18% vs. 20%, p = 0.5), or circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity (6.4% vs. 10%, p = 0.12). Complication rates and local recurrence were also comparable. However, among clinical T4 tumors, SCRT was associated with significantly lower 2-year DFS (41.2% vs. 58.7%, p = 0.03) and a trend toward worse OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCRT provides comparable oncological outcomes to LCRT in low rectal cancer when appropriately selected. However, in clinical T4 tumors, LCRT appears.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Choice of Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced, Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Matched Analysis Comparing Short-Course Radiation With Long-Course Chemoradiation From a Tertiary Cancer Center.\",\"authors\":\"Tejas Vispute, Devesh S Ballal, Raj Kapadia, Ashwin Desouza, Ankit Sharma, Mufaddal Kazi, Akshay Baheti, Vikas Ostwal, Avanish P Saklani\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.70019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare oncological outcomes of short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) versus long-course chemoradiation (LCRT) in patients with low rectal cancer, particularly in a high-volume center with expertise in extended total mesorectal excision (TME).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-institution, retrospective propensity-matched study using a prospectively maintained database. Patients with low rectal cancer (≤ 5 cm from the anal verge) who underwent neoadjuvant radiation (SCRT or LCRT) followed by TME between January 2014 and January 2021 were included. A 3:1 propensity score match was performed based on key clinical variables. Patients with metastatic disease or prior pelvic radiation were excluded. SCRT (25 Gy in 5 fractions) ± chemotherapy was followed by immediate or delayed surgery, while LCRT (50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions) was given with capecitabine ± chemotherapy, followed by surgery. Extended resections were performed as indicated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 466 LCRT and 157 SCRT patients were analyzed. Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) was similar (62% LCRT vs. 64% SCRT, p = 0.8), with no significant differences in overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), pathological complete response (pCR: 18% vs. 20%, p = 0.5), or circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity (6.4% vs. 10%, p = 0.12). Complication rates and local recurrence were also comparable. However, among clinical T4 tumors, SCRT was associated with significantly lower 2-year DFS (41.2% vs. 58.7%, p = 0.03) and a trend toward worse OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCRT provides comparable oncological outcomes to LCRT in low rectal cancer when appropriately selected. However, in clinical T4 tumors, LCRT appears.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较低直肠癌患者的短期放射治疗(SCRT)与长期放化疗(LCRT)的肿瘤学结果,特别是在具有扩展全肠系膜切除术(TME)专业知识的大容量中心。方法:这是一项单机构、回顾性倾向匹配研究,使用前瞻性维护的数据库。纳入2014年1月至2021年1月期间接受新辅助放疗(SCRT或LCRT)后TME的低位直肠癌(距肛缘≤5cm)患者。根据关键临床变量进行3:1倾向评分匹配。排除有转移性疾病或既往盆腔放疗的患者。SCRT (25 Gy / 5次)±化疗后立即或延迟手术,LCRT (50-50.4 Gy / 25-28次)给予卡培他滨±化疗后手术。按照指示进行大面积切除。结果:配对后,对466例LCRT和157例SCRT患者进行分析。三年无病生存率(DFS)相似(62% LCRT vs 64% SCRT, p = 0.8),总生存率(OS)、局部无复发生存率(LRFS)、病理完全缓解(pCR: 18% vs 20%, p = 0.5)或环切缘(CRM)阳性(6.4% vs 10%, p = 0.12)无显著差异。并发症发生率和局部复发率也具有可比性。然而,在临床T4肿瘤中,SCRT与较低的2年DFS (41.2% vs. 58.7%, p = 0.03)和更差的OS相关。结论:在低位直肠癌中,如果选择适当,SCRT可提供与LCRT相当的肿瘤预后。然而,在临床T4肿瘤中出现LCRT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal Choice of Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced, Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Matched Analysis Comparing Short-Course Radiation With Long-Course Chemoradiation From a Tertiary Cancer Center.

Aim: To compare oncological outcomes of short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) versus long-course chemoradiation (LCRT) in patients with low rectal cancer, particularly in a high-volume center with expertise in extended total mesorectal excision (TME).

Methods: This was a single-institution, retrospective propensity-matched study using a prospectively maintained database. Patients with low rectal cancer (≤ 5 cm from the anal verge) who underwent neoadjuvant radiation (SCRT or LCRT) followed by TME between January 2014 and January 2021 were included. A 3:1 propensity score match was performed based on key clinical variables. Patients with metastatic disease or prior pelvic radiation were excluded. SCRT (25 Gy in 5 fractions) ± chemotherapy was followed by immediate or delayed surgery, while LCRT (50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions) was given with capecitabine ± chemotherapy, followed by surgery. Extended resections were performed as indicated.

Results: After matching, 466 LCRT and 157 SCRT patients were analyzed. Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) was similar (62% LCRT vs. 64% SCRT, p = 0.8), with no significant differences in overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), pathological complete response (pCR: 18% vs. 20%, p = 0.5), or circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity (6.4% vs. 10%, p = 0.12). Complication rates and local recurrence were also comparable. However, among clinical T4 tumors, SCRT was associated with significantly lower 2-year DFS (41.2% vs. 58.7%, p = 0.03) and a trend toward worse OS.

Conclusion: SCRT provides comparable oncological outcomes to LCRT in low rectal cancer when appropriately selected. However, in clinical T4 tumors, LCRT appears.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信