术后康复在TM关节关节炎中的作用:间置梯形切除术与假体的功能结局。

IF 2.6 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Camillo Fulchignoni, Silvia Pietramala, Leopoldo Arioli, Emanuele Gerace, Domenico De Mauro, Giulia Frittella, Elisa Di Dio, Mirko Grauso, Gianfranco Merendi, Lorenzo Rocchi
{"title":"术后康复在TM关节关节炎中的作用:间置梯形切除术与假体的功能结局。","authors":"Camillo Fulchignoni, Silvia Pietramala, Leopoldo Arioli, Emanuele Gerace, Domenico De Mauro, Giulia Frittella, Elisa Di Dio, Mirko Grauso, Gianfranco Merendi, Lorenzo Rocchi","doi":"10.3390/jfmk10020198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Trapeziometacarpal (TM) joint arthritis is a common condition causing pain and functional limitations, particularly in activities requiring pinch and grip strength. Surgical options such as interposition trapeziectomy and prosthetic joint replacement have demonstrated varying degrees of success. However, the role of post-operative rehabilitation in optimizing outcomes for these procedures remains underexplored. Effective rehabilitation may be critical for restoring strength, range of motion (ROM), and overall hand function; yet, no consensus exists on the best approach for either surgical modality. This study aims to evaluate the impact of post-operative rehabilitation on functional and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing interposition trapeziectomy versus prosthetic replacement for TM joint arthritis. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients treated for TM joint arthritis between November 2023 and October 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical procedure: interposition trapeziectomy and prosthetic replacement. Patients randomly followed post-operative rehabilitation protocols, auto-assisted exercises, or no type of rehabilitation. The outcomes assessed included pain (VAS), return to work or heavy activities, post-operative complications, hand function (DASH score), and patient satisfaction at 1 and 6 months after surgery. <b>Results</b>: The prosthesis group consisted of 30 patients, while 31 patients underwent interposition trapeziectomy. Patients in both groups showed good improvements in pain, ROM, and hand function post rehabilitation. The prosthetic group demonstrated a faster recovery of strength and higher early satisfaction scores, but in the long term, the results were overlapping. No significant differences were observed in long-term functional outcomes or patient satisfaction at 6 months. In the trapeziectomy group, for patients who followed a rehabilitation program, no significant differences were found. <b>Conclusions</b>: Post-operative rehabilitation finds its place in recovery after both interposition trapeziectomy and prosthetic replacement for TM joint arthritis. While prosthetic replacement allows for quicker functional recovery, interposition trapeziectomy offers comparable long-term results with a lower complication profile. Tailored rehabilitation protocols may enhance outcomes and should be considered an integral part of TM joint arthritis management in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12193712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Post-Operative Rehabilitation in TM Joint Arthritis: Functional Outcomes of Interposition Trapeziectomy vs. Prosthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Camillo Fulchignoni, Silvia Pietramala, Leopoldo Arioli, Emanuele Gerace, Domenico De Mauro, Giulia Frittella, Elisa Di Dio, Mirko Grauso, Gianfranco Merendi, Lorenzo Rocchi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jfmk10020198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Trapeziometacarpal (TM) joint arthritis is a common condition causing pain and functional limitations, particularly in activities requiring pinch and grip strength. Surgical options such as interposition trapeziectomy and prosthetic joint replacement have demonstrated varying degrees of success. However, the role of post-operative rehabilitation in optimizing outcomes for these procedures remains underexplored. Effective rehabilitation may be critical for restoring strength, range of motion (ROM), and overall hand function; yet, no consensus exists on the best approach for either surgical modality. This study aims to evaluate the impact of post-operative rehabilitation on functional and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing interposition trapeziectomy versus prosthetic replacement for TM joint arthritis. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients treated for TM joint arthritis between November 2023 and October 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical procedure: interposition trapeziectomy and prosthetic replacement. Patients randomly followed post-operative rehabilitation protocols, auto-assisted exercises, or no type of rehabilitation. The outcomes assessed included pain (VAS), return to work or heavy activities, post-operative complications, hand function (DASH score), and patient satisfaction at 1 and 6 months after surgery. <b>Results</b>: The prosthesis group consisted of 30 patients, while 31 patients underwent interposition trapeziectomy. Patients in both groups showed good improvements in pain, ROM, and hand function post rehabilitation. The prosthetic group demonstrated a faster recovery of strength and higher early satisfaction scores, but in the long term, the results were overlapping. No significant differences were observed in long-term functional outcomes or patient satisfaction at 6 months. In the trapeziectomy group, for patients who followed a rehabilitation program, no significant differences were found. <b>Conclusions</b>: Post-operative rehabilitation finds its place in recovery after both interposition trapeziectomy and prosthetic replacement for TM joint arthritis. While prosthetic replacement allows for quicker functional recovery, interposition trapeziectomy offers comparable long-term results with a lower complication profile. Tailored rehabilitation protocols may enhance outcomes and should be considered an integral part of TM joint arthritis management in selected patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12193712/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10020198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10020198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:梯形腕关节(TM)关节炎是一种常见的疾病,引起疼痛和功能限制,特别是在需要握力和握力的活动中。手术选择,如插入式梯形切除术和假体关节置换术已经证明了不同程度的成功。然而,术后康复在优化这些手术结果中的作用仍未得到充分探讨。有效的康复可能对恢复力量、活动范围(ROM)和整体手部功能至关重要;然而,对于两种手术方式的最佳方法尚无共识。本研究旨在评估介入斜方椎体切除术与人工关节置换术对TM关节关节炎患者术后康复对功能和临床结果的影响。方法:对2023年11月至2024年10月期间治疗的TM关节关节炎患者进行回顾性队列研究。患者根据手术方式分为两组:间置梯形切除术和假体置换术。患者随机接受术后康复方案、自动辅助训练或不接受任何类型的康复治疗。评估的结果包括疼痛(VAS)、恢复工作或重活动、术后并发症、手功能(DASH评分)以及术后1个月和6个月的患者满意度。结果:假体组30例,行间置梯形切除术31例。两组患者康复后疼痛、ROM和手部功能均有良好改善。假体组表现出更快的力量恢复和更高的早期满意度得分,但从长期来看,结果是重叠的。在6个月的长期功能结局或患者满意度方面没有观察到显著差异。在梯形切除术组中,遵循康复计划的患者没有发现显著差异。结论:TM关节关节炎介入式斜方切除术和人工关节置换术后,术后康复均有重要作用。虽然假体置换术允许更快的功能恢复,但插入式梯形切除术提供了类似的长期结果,并发症更低。量身定制的康复方案可提高治疗效果,应将其视为选定患者TM关节关节炎治疗的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of Post-Operative Rehabilitation in TM Joint Arthritis: Functional Outcomes of Interposition Trapeziectomy vs. Prosthesis.

Background: Trapeziometacarpal (TM) joint arthritis is a common condition causing pain and functional limitations, particularly in activities requiring pinch and grip strength. Surgical options such as interposition trapeziectomy and prosthetic joint replacement have demonstrated varying degrees of success. However, the role of post-operative rehabilitation in optimizing outcomes for these procedures remains underexplored. Effective rehabilitation may be critical for restoring strength, range of motion (ROM), and overall hand function; yet, no consensus exists on the best approach for either surgical modality. This study aims to evaluate the impact of post-operative rehabilitation on functional and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing interposition trapeziectomy versus prosthetic replacement for TM joint arthritis. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients treated for TM joint arthritis between November 2023 and October 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical procedure: interposition trapeziectomy and prosthetic replacement. Patients randomly followed post-operative rehabilitation protocols, auto-assisted exercises, or no type of rehabilitation. The outcomes assessed included pain (VAS), return to work or heavy activities, post-operative complications, hand function (DASH score), and patient satisfaction at 1 and 6 months after surgery. Results: The prosthesis group consisted of 30 patients, while 31 patients underwent interposition trapeziectomy. Patients in both groups showed good improvements in pain, ROM, and hand function post rehabilitation. The prosthetic group demonstrated a faster recovery of strength and higher early satisfaction scores, but in the long term, the results were overlapping. No significant differences were observed in long-term functional outcomes or patient satisfaction at 6 months. In the trapeziectomy group, for patients who followed a rehabilitation program, no significant differences were found. Conclusions: Post-operative rehabilitation finds its place in recovery after both interposition trapeziectomy and prosthetic replacement for TM joint arthritis. While prosthetic replacement allows for quicker functional recovery, interposition trapeziectomy offers comparable long-term results with a lower complication profile. Tailored rehabilitation protocols may enhance outcomes and should be considered an integral part of TM joint arthritis management in selected patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信