Matteo Vitarelli, Francesco Laterza, Saúl Peñín-Grandes, Marco Alfonso Perrone, Alejandro Santos-Lozano, Maurizio Volterrani, Giuseppe Marazzi, Vincenzo Manzi, Elvira Padua, Barbara Sposato, Valentina Morsella, Ferdinando Iellamo, Giuseppe Caminiti
{"title":"缺血性心脏病高血压患者短时间等长运动与联合运动诱导的运动后低血压:一项初步研究","authors":"Matteo Vitarelli, Francesco Laterza, Saúl Peñín-Grandes, Marco Alfonso Perrone, Alejandro Santos-Lozano, Maurizio Volterrani, Giuseppe Marazzi, Vincenzo Manzi, Elvira Padua, Barbara Sposato, Valentina Morsella, Ferdinando Iellamo, Giuseppe Caminiti","doi":"10.3390/jfmk10020189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Short sessions of isometric exercise have been shown to reduce blood pressure (BP) in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. However, there are few data in hypertensive patients with underlying ischemic heart disease (IHD). In the present study, we compared post-exercise hypotension (PEH) induced by isometric versus combined, aerobic plus dynamic resistance exercise in IHD patients. <b>Methods</b>: Twenty-five stable patients with established IHD and with treated hypertension were enrolled. The study had a cross-over design. All patients performed in a random order and on different days: (1) isometric exercise session (IES) consisting of bilateral knee extension, performed at 20% of maximal voluntary contraction and lasting 20 min; (2) combined exercise session (CES) including moderate-intensity continuous exercise at and dynamic resistance exercise performed at 60% of one repetition maximum, and lasting 60 min and (3) control session (no exercise). BP was measured at rest, immediately after the training and then every 15 min up to 90 min. <b>Results:</b> The repeated measures ANOVA analysis showed that systolic BP significantly decreased after the CES session compared to the control (F = 6.2; <i>p</i> 0.001) and IES (F = 4.4; <i>p</i> 0.004). Systolic BP significantly decreased after IES compared to the control (F = 3.6; <i>p</i> 0.036). Diastolic BP did not show significant changes after CES and IES compared to the control (CES vs. control: F = 2.2; <i>p</i> 0.142; IES vs. control (F = 2.5; <i>p</i> 0.062). There were no significant differences in diastolic BP changes between CES and IES (CES vs. IES: F = 1.8; <i>p</i> 0.156). <b>Conclusions:</b> We observed that CES was more effective than IES in reducing systolic BP; IES was as effective as CES in inducing diastolic PEH in hypertensive patients with underlying IHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-Exercise Hypotension Induced by a Short Isometric Exercise Session Versus Combined Exercise in Hypertensive Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Vitarelli, Francesco Laterza, Saúl Peñín-Grandes, Marco Alfonso Perrone, Alejandro Santos-Lozano, Maurizio Volterrani, Giuseppe Marazzi, Vincenzo Manzi, Elvira Padua, Barbara Sposato, Valentina Morsella, Ferdinando Iellamo, Giuseppe Caminiti\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jfmk10020189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Short sessions of isometric exercise have been shown to reduce blood pressure (BP) in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. However, there are few data in hypertensive patients with underlying ischemic heart disease (IHD). In the present study, we compared post-exercise hypotension (PEH) induced by isometric versus combined, aerobic plus dynamic resistance exercise in IHD patients. <b>Methods</b>: Twenty-five stable patients with established IHD and with treated hypertension were enrolled. The study had a cross-over design. All patients performed in a random order and on different days: (1) isometric exercise session (IES) consisting of bilateral knee extension, performed at 20% of maximal voluntary contraction and lasting 20 min; (2) combined exercise session (CES) including moderate-intensity continuous exercise at and dynamic resistance exercise performed at 60% of one repetition maximum, and lasting 60 min and (3) control session (no exercise). BP was measured at rest, immediately after the training and then every 15 min up to 90 min. <b>Results:</b> The repeated measures ANOVA analysis showed that systolic BP significantly decreased after the CES session compared to the control (F = 6.2; <i>p</i> 0.001) and IES (F = 4.4; <i>p</i> 0.004). Systolic BP significantly decreased after IES compared to the control (F = 3.6; <i>p</i> 0.036). Diastolic BP did not show significant changes after CES and IES compared to the control (CES vs. control: F = 2.2; <i>p</i> 0.142; IES vs. control (F = 2.5; <i>p</i> 0.062). There were no significant differences in diastolic BP changes between CES and IES (CES vs. IES: F = 1.8; <i>p</i> 0.156). <b>Conclusions:</b> We observed that CES was more effective than IES in reducing systolic BP; IES was as effective as CES in inducing diastolic PEH in hypertensive patients with underlying IHD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194243/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10020189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10020189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:短时间的等长运动已被证明可以降低正常血压和高血压患者的血压。然而,高血压合并缺血性心脏病(IHD)患者的相关资料很少。在本研究中,我们比较了IHD患者运动后低血压(PEH)由等长运动与有氧加动态阻力运动联合引起。方法:纳入25例稳定的IHD患者和治疗高血压患者。该研究采用交叉设计。所有患者按随机顺序在不同日期进行:(1)等长运动(IES),包括双侧膝关节伸展,以最大自愿收缩的20%进行,持续20分钟;(2)联合运动组(CES),包括中等强度的连续运动和动态阻力运动,每次最多重复60%,持续60分钟;(3)对照组(不运动)。在休息时测量血压,训练后立即测量血压,然后每15分钟测量一次,直到90分钟。结果:重复测量方差分析显示,与对照组相比,CES训练后收缩压显著降低(F = 6.2;p 0.001)和IES (F = 4.4;p 0.004)。与对照组相比,IES后收缩压显著降低(F = 3.6;p 0.036)。与对照组相比,CES和IES后舒张压没有明显变化(CES vs. control: F = 2.2;p 0.142;IES vs.对照组(F = 2.5;p 0.062)。CES组与IES组舒张压变化无显著差异(CES vs. IES: F = 1.8;p 0.156)。结论:我们观察到CES在降低收缩压方面比IES更有效;在合并IHD的高血压患者中,IES与CES在诱导舒张性PEH方面同样有效。
Post-Exercise Hypotension Induced by a Short Isometric Exercise Session Versus Combined Exercise in Hypertensive Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease: A Pilot Study.
Background: Short sessions of isometric exercise have been shown to reduce blood pressure (BP) in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. However, there are few data in hypertensive patients with underlying ischemic heart disease (IHD). In the present study, we compared post-exercise hypotension (PEH) induced by isometric versus combined, aerobic plus dynamic resistance exercise in IHD patients. Methods: Twenty-five stable patients with established IHD and with treated hypertension were enrolled. The study had a cross-over design. All patients performed in a random order and on different days: (1) isometric exercise session (IES) consisting of bilateral knee extension, performed at 20% of maximal voluntary contraction and lasting 20 min; (2) combined exercise session (CES) including moderate-intensity continuous exercise at and dynamic resistance exercise performed at 60% of one repetition maximum, and lasting 60 min and (3) control session (no exercise). BP was measured at rest, immediately after the training and then every 15 min up to 90 min. Results: The repeated measures ANOVA analysis showed that systolic BP significantly decreased after the CES session compared to the control (F = 6.2; p 0.001) and IES (F = 4.4; p 0.004). Systolic BP significantly decreased after IES compared to the control (F = 3.6; p 0.036). Diastolic BP did not show significant changes after CES and IES compared to the control (CES vs. control: F = 2.2; p 0.142; IES vs. control (F = 2.5; p 0.062). There were no significant differences in diastolic BP changes between CES and IES (CES vs. IES: F = 1.8; p 0.156). Conclusions: We observed that CES was more effective than IES in reducing systolic BP; IES was as effective as CES in inducing diastolic PEH in hypertensive patients with underlying IHD.