青少年娱乐板手身体素质的比较研究。

IF 2.6 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Ana Pereira, Luis Leitão, Diogo L Marques, Daniel A Marinho, Henrique P Neiva
{"title":"青少年娱乐板手身体素质的比较研究。","authors":"Ana Pereira, Luis Leitão, Diogo L Marques, Daniel A Marinho, Henrique P Neiva","doi":"10.3390/jfmk10020214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In recent years, padel-based interventions have been widely applied in junior and elite players of both genders concerning athletic performance, whereas evidence of their efficacy in trials that use simple randomization has not been well established. This study aimed to compare the effects of 8 weeks of padel training (PD) on the strength and power of untrained healthy children. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-five children aged 11-15 years (12.36 ± 1.15 years) were randomly assigned into experimental (PD) (nine boys and five girls: 1.58 ± 0.04 m; 50.00 ± 6.75 kg; and 19.96 ± 1.95 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and control (CT) (seven boys and four girls: 1.60 ± 0.05 m; 56.92 ± 2.75 kg; and 21.61 ± 1.02 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) groups. The PD group trained twice a week for 8 weeks, and the CT group did not follow any training program and did not participate in regular exercise or sports. Countermovement jump, medicine ball throw, handgrip, and 5 m sprint test results were measured at baseline and after the intervention in the padel sport group. <b>Results:</b> The results showed a significant interaction for training-induced responses in the sprint test (T5) (F = 10.55, <i>p</i> = 0.004, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.31). No significant interactions were observed for handgrip strength (HG) (F = 3.90, p=0.06), the medicine ball throw (MBT) (F = 0.851, <i>p</i> = 0.37, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.04), and the countermovement jump (F = 1.04, <i>p</i> =0.32, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.04), with clear improvements from pre- to post-training in the PD group. After 8 weeks of training, the PD group showed increased performance in handgrip strength (<i>p</i> = 0.004), while the CT group had decreased velocity post-training (<i>p</i> = 0.011). <b>Conclusions:</b> The individual results in the PD group showed an improvement, which suggests that the practice of padel seems to be a good strategy for improving one's fitness. It is suggested that 8 weeks of PD seem to be effective in improving strength- and power-related variables in healthy, untrained children. This could be considered an alternative to traditional sports to improve the body fitness of young children and should be applied in school-based programs and the sports club community. Also, more high-quality RCTs are needed in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12193966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study in Physical Fitness in Recreative Young Padel Players.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Pereira, Luis Leitão, Diogo L Marques, Daniel A Marinho, Henrique P Neiva\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jfmk10020214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In recent years, padel-based interventions have been widely applied in junior and elite players of both genders concerning athletic performance, whereas evidence of their efficacy in trials that use simple randomization has not been well established. This study aimed to compare the effects of 8 weeks of padel training (PD) on the strength and power of untrained healthy children. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-five children aged 11-15 years (12.36 ± 1.15 years) were randomly assigned into experimental (PD) (nine boys and five girls: 1.58 ± 0.04 m; 50.00 ± 6.75 kg; and 19.96 ± 1.95 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and control (CT) (seven boys and four girls: 1.60 ± 0.05 m; 56.92 ± 2.75 kg; and 21.61 ± 1.02 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) groups. The PD group trained twice a week for 8 weeks, and the CT group did not follow any training program and did not participate in regular exercise or sports. Countermovement jump, medicine ball throw, handgrip, and 5 m sprint test results were measured at baseline and after the intervention in the padel sport group. <b>Results:</b> The results showed a significant interaction for training-induced responses in the sprint test (T5) (F = 10.55, <i>p</i> = 0.004, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.31). No significant interactions were observed for handgrip strength (HG) (F = 3.90, p=0.06), the medicine ball throw (MBT) (F = 0.851, <i>p</i> = 0.37, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.04), and the countermovement jump (F = 1.04, <i>p</i> =0.32, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.04), with clear improvements from pre- to post-training in the PD group. After 8 weeks of training, the PD group showed increased performance in handgrip strength (<i>p</i> = 0.004), while the CT group had decreased velocity post-training (<i>p</i> = 0.011). <b>Conclusions:</b> The individual results in the PD group showed an improvement, which suggests that the practice of padel seems to be a good strategy for improving one's fitness. It is suggested that 8 weeks of PD seem to be effective in improving strength- and power-related variables in healthy, untrained children. This could be considered an alternative to traditional sports to improve the body fitness of young children and should be applied in school-based programs and the sports club community. Also, more high-quality RCTs are needed in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12193966/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10020214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10020214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,基于挡板的干预措施已被广泛应用于男女青少年和精英运动员的运动表现,然而,在使用简单随机化的试验中,其有效性的证据尚未得到很好的确立。本研究旨在比较8周的模式训练(PD)对未训练的健康儿童力量和力量的影响。方法:25例11 ~ 15岁(12.36±1.15岁)儿童随机分为实验组(PD),男9例,女5例:1.58±0.04 m;50.00±6.75 kg;19.96±1.95 kg/m2)和对照组(CT)(7男4女:1.60±0.05 m;56.92±2.75 kg;21.61±1.02 kg/m2组。PD组每周训练2次,持续8周,CT组不遵循任何训练计划,不参加定期锻炼和运动。模型运动组在基线时和干预后进行反动作跳跃、实心球投掷、握拍和5米冲刺测试。结果:在冲刺测试(T5)中,训练诱导反应存在显著的交互作用(F = 10.55, p = 0.004, η2 = 0.31)。PD组握力(HG) (F = 3.90, p=0.06)、实心球投掷(MBT) (F = 0.851, p= 0.37, η2 = 0.04)、反动作跳跃(F = 1.04, p= 0.32, η2 = 0.04)无显著交互作用,PD组训练前后有明显改善。训练8周后,PD组握力增强(p = 0.004),而CT组训练后速度下降(p = 0.011)。结论:PD组的个体结果有所改善,提示模型练习似乎是一种改善健康的好策略。这表明,8周的PD似乎可以有效地改善健康的、未经训练的儿童的力量和力量相关变量。这可以被认为是传统体育的一种替代,以提高幼儿的身体素质,并应应用于学校为基础的项目和体育俱乐部社区。未来还需要更多高质量的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study in Physical Fitness in Recreative Young Padel Players.

Background: In recent years, padel-based interventions have been widely applied in junior and elite players of both genders concerning athletic performance, whereas evidence of their efficacy in trials that use simple randomization has not been well established. This study aimed to compare the effects of 8 weeks of padel training (PD) on the strength and power of untrained healthy children. Methods: Twenty-five children aged 11-15 years (12.36 ± 1.15 years) were randomly assigned into experimental (PD) (nine boys and five girls: 1.58 ± 0.04 m; 50.00 ± 6.75 kg; and 19.96 ± 1.95 kg/m2) and control (CT) (seven boys and four girls: 1.60 ± 0.05 m; 56.92 ± 2.75 kg; and 21.61 ± 1.02 kg/m2) groups. The PD group trained twice a week for 8 weeks, and the CT group did not follow any training program and did not participate in regular exercise or sports. Countermovement jump, medicine ball throw, handgrip, and 5 m sprint test results were measured at baseline and after the intervention in the padel sport group. Results: The results showed a significant interaction for training-induced responses in the sprint test (T5) (F = 10.55, p = 0.004, η2 = 0.31). No significant interactions were observed for handgrip strength (HG) (F = 3.90, p=0.06), the medicine ball throw (MBT) (F = 0.851, p = 0.37, η2 = 0.04), and the countermovement jump (F = 1.04, p =0.32, η2 = 0.04), with clear improvements from pre- to post-training in the PD group. After 8 weeks of training, the PD group showed increased performance in handgrip strength (p = 0.004), while the CT group had decreased velocity post-training (p = 0.011). Conclusions: The individual results in the PD group showed an improvement, which suggests that the practice of padel seems to be a good strategy for improving one's fitness. It is suggested that 8 weeks of PD seem to be effective in improving strength- and power-related variables in healthy, untrained children. This could be considered an alternative to traditional sports to improve the body fitness of young children and should be applied in school-based programs and the sports club community. Also, more high-quality RCTs are needed in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信