两种盲臂丛神经阻滞在山羊尸体中的比较。

IF 1.5 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.5455/javar.2025.l872
Sunisa Sirimongkolvorakul, Tanasid Sornphu
{"title":"两种盲臂丛神经阻滞在山羊尸体中的比较。","authors":"Sunisa Sirimongkolvorakul, Tanasid Sornphu","doi":"10.5455/javar.2025.l872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare two approaches to the brachial plexus: the traditional blind method and an additional technique, both of which use anatomical landmarks to guide needle insertion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The traditional and additional approaches were performed on both thoracic limbs of 24 cadavers (24 for each approach). Methylene dye is used for injection and nerve staining. We counted the nerves that successfully stained (staining less than 1 cm). The Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test was used to compare approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings indicated that all cadavers were successfully used. The traditional approach and the additional approach revealed success rates of 45.83% and 54.17%, respectively. We found no significant differences between the two techniques (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The additional approach presents a viable alternative to the traditional method for performing the brachial plexus block in goats. Further research into the clinical differences between these techniques could lead to useful insights that help make them more accurate and useful.</p>","PeriodicalId":14892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"64-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two blind brachial plexus blocks in goat cadavers.\",\"authors\":\"Sunisa Sirimongkolvorakul, Tanasid Sornphu\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/javar.2025.l872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare two approaches to the brachial plexus: the traditional blind method and an additional technique, both of which use anatomical landmarks to guide needle insertion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The traditional and additional approaches were performed on both thoracic limbs of 24 cadavers (24 for each approach). Methylene dye is used for injection and nerve staining. We counted the nerves that successfully stained (staining less than 1 cm). The Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test was used to compare approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings indicated that all cadavers were successfully used. The traditional approach and the additional approach revealed success rates of 45.83% and 54.17%, respectively. We found no significant differences between the two techniques (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The additional approach presents a viable alternative to the traditional method for performing the brachial plexus block in goats. Further research into the clinical differences between these techniques could lead to useful insights that help make them more accurate and useful.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"64-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186784/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2025.l872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2025.l872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较两种进入臂丛的方法:传统的盲法和一种附加技术,这两种方法都是利用解剖标志来引导针的插入。材料和方法:对24具尸体的双胸肢行传统入路和附加入路(每种入路24例)。亚甲基染料用于注射和神经染色。我们统计染色成功的神经(染色小于1 cm)。曼-惠特尼U检验用于比较方法。结果:所有尸体均被成功利用。传统入路和附加入路的成功率分别为45.83%和54.17%。我们发现两种技术之间无显著差异(p < 0.05)。结论:在山羊臂丛神经阻滞手术中,附加入路是一种可行的替代方法。进一步研究这些技术之间的临床差异可能会带来有用的见解,有助于使它们更加准确和有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of two blind brachial plexus blocks in goat cadavers.

Comparison of two blind brachial plexus blocks in goat cadavers.

Comparison of two blind brachial plexus blocks in goat cadavers.

Objective: This study aimed to compare two approaches to the brachial plexus: the traditional blind method and an additional technique, both of which use anatomical landmarks to guide needle insertion.

Materials and methods: The traditional and additional approaches were performed on both thoracic limbs of 24 cadavers (24 for each approach). Methylene dye is used for injection and nerve staining. We counted the nerves that successfully stained (staining less than 1 cm). The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare approaches.

Results: The findings indicated that all cadavers were successfully used. The traditional approach and the additional approach revealed success rates of 45.83% and 54.17%, respectively. We found no significant differences between the two techniques (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The additional approach presents a viable alternative to the traditional method for performing the brachial plexus block in goats. Further research into the clinical differences between these techniques could lead to useful insights that help make them more accurate and useful.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
41
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research (JAVAR) - is an open access, international, peer-reviewed, quarterly, highly-indexed scientific journal publishing original research findings and reviews on all aspects of veterinary and animal sciences. Basic and applied researches on- - Anatomy & histology - Animal health economics - Animal nutrition - Animal reproduction - Animal science - Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) - Biochemistry - Biotechnology - Dairy science - Epidemiology - Food hygiene and technology - Genetics and breeding - Immunology - Microbiology - Parasitology - Pathology - Pharmacology & toxicology - Physiology - Poultry science - Preventive veterinary medicine - Public health - Surgery & obstetrics - Veterinary extension studies - Wildlife & aquatic medicine - Zoo animal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信