2005年至2023年全球精神疾病患者自我耻辱感的变化:一项跨时间元分析和系统回顾。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Xianying Lu, Huan Chen, Dingxi Bai, Xinyu Chen, Wenting Ji, Huiting Gao, Yijia Yuan, Chaoming Hou, Jing Gao
{"title":"2005年至2023年全球精神疾病患者自我耻辱感的变化:一项跨时间元分析和系统回顾。","authors":"Xianying Lu, Huan Chen, Dingxi Bai, Xinyu Chen, Wenting Ji, Huiting Gao, Yijia Yuan, Chaoming Hou, Jing Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-stigma in mental illness constitutes a growing public health imperative, with limited longitudinal data available to characterize its evolution over time. Here, we employed cross-temporal meta-analysis to systematically assess whether self-stigma levels have escalated, leveraging standardized measurement tools to quantify potential changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched six databases (inception to July 2024) for studies measuring self-stigma using the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Inventory (ISMI). Two researchers independently screened studies and extracted data. SPSS 25.0 and R 4.4.2 were used for correlation, regression, and quantification of self-stigma differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>179 articles involving 33,046 people were identified. Self-stigma levels increased across all ISMI dimensions from 2005 to 2023 (β = 0.086-0.283), corresponding to small-to-large effect size (d = 0.30-0.89). Notably, stigma resilience increased significantly (d = 0.89), which is a noteworthy observation, suggesting a positive shift in their ability to cope with stigmatizing experiences. Subgroup analyses further revealed that people with mild mental illnesses experienced more severe and frequent self-stigma (d = 1.07-2.80) than those with severe mental illnesses (d = 0.13-1.02). Geographically, self-stigma increased in Asian regions (d > 0), while trends in other regions were mixed (d > 0 or < 0). Importantly, statistically significant differences (P<sup>a</sup> <0.05 in ISMI and its dimensions) across illness severities and continents mental illness located further validated these subgroup findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-stigma within the studied age group has indeed increased from 2005 to 2023, underscoring an immediate need for intervention. Consequentially, continuous data is essential to monitor its persistence. Moreover, exploring self-stigma's social determinants to provide effective intervention strategies is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":14368,"journal":{"name":"International psychogeriatrics","volume":" ","pages":"100106"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Worldwide changes in self-stigma among people with mental illness from 2005 to 2023: A cross-temporal meta-analysis and systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Xianying Lu, Huan Chen, Dingxi Bai, Xinyu Chen, Wenting Ji, Huiting Gao, Yijia Yuan, Chaoming Hou, Jing Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-stigma in mental illness constitutes a growing public health imperative, with limited longitudinal data available to characterize its evolution over time. Here, we employed cross-temporal meta-analysis to systematically assess whether self-stigma levels have escalated, leveraging standardized measurement tools to quantify potential changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched six databases (inception to July 2024) for studies measuring self-stigma using the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Inventory (ISMI). Two researchers independently screened studies and extracted data. SPSS 25.0 and R 4.4.2 were used for correlation, regression, and quantification of self-stigma differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>179 articles involving 33,046 people were identified. Self-stigma levels increased across all ISMI dimensions from 2005 to 2023 (β = 0.086-0.283), corresponding to small-to-large effect size (d = 0.30-0.89). Notably, stigma resilience increased significantly (d = 0.89), which is a noteworthy observation, suggesting a positive shift in their ability to cope with stigmatizing experiences. Subgroup analyses further revealed that people with mild mental illnesses experienced more severe and frequent self-stigma (d = 1.07-2.80) than those with severe mental illnesses (d = 0.13-1.02). Geographically, self-stigma increased in Asian regions (d > 0), while trends in other regions were mixed (d > 0 or < 0). Importantly, statistically significant differences (P<sup>a</sup> <0.05 in ISMI and its dimensions) across illness severities and continents mental illness located further validated these subgroup findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-stigma within the studied age group has indeed increased from 2005 to 2023, underscoring an immediate need for intervention. Consequentially, continuous data is essential to monitor its persistence. Moreover, exploring self-stigma's social determinants to provide effective intervention strategies is necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International psychogeriatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International psychogeriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100106\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:精神疾病的自我污名化日益成为公共卫生的当务之急,但可用于表征其随时间演变的纵向数据有限。在这里,我们采用跨时间元分析来系统评估自我耻辱水平是否已经升级,利用标准化测量工具来量化潜在的变化。方法:我们检索了6个数据库(从创建到2024年7月),用于使用精神疾病内化耻辱量表(ISMI)测量自我耻辱的研究。两名研究人员独立筛选研究并提取数据。采用SPSS 25.0和r4.4.2对自我耻感差异进行相关、回归和量化。结果:共检索到179篇文献,涉及33046人。从2005年到2023年,所有ISMI维度的自我耻辱感水平都有所增加(β = 0.086-0.283),对应于小到大的效应量(d = 0.30-0.89)。值得注意的是,污名复原力显著增加(d = 0.89),这是一个值得注意的观察结果,表明他们应对污名化经历的能力发生了积极的转变。亚组分析进一步显示,轻度精神疾病患者比重度精神疾病患者(d = 0.13-1.02)经历更严重、更频繁的自我耻辱(d = 1.07-2.80)。从地理上看,亚洲地区的自我耻辱感增加(d > 0),而其他地区的趋势则喜忧参半(d > 0或< 0)。重要的是,统计上的显著差异(Pa结论:从2005年到2023年,研究年龄组的自我耻辱感确实有所增加,强调了迫切需要干预。因此,连续数据对于监视其持久性至关重要。此外,探索自我耻辱的社会决定因素以提供有效的干预策略是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Worldwide changes in self-stigma among people with mental illness from 2005 to 2023: A cross-temporal meta-analysis and systematic review.

Background: Self-stigma in mental illness constitutes a growing public health imperative, with limited longitudinal data available to characterize its evolution over time. Here, we employed cross-temporal meta-analysis to systematically assess whether self-stigma levels have escalated, leveraging standardized measurement tools to quantify potential changes.

Methods: We searched six databases (inception to July 2024) for studies measuring self-stigma using the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Inventory (ISMI). Two researchers independently screened studies and extracted data. SPSS 25.0 and R 4.4.2 were used for correlation, regression, and quantification of self-stigma differences.

Results: 179 articles involving 33,046 people were identified. Self-stigma levels increased across all ISMI dimensions from 2005 to 2023 (β = 0.086-0.283), corresponding to small-to-large effect size (d = 0.30-0.89). Notably, stigma resilience increased significantly (d = 0.89), which is a noteworthy observation, suggesting a positive shift in their ability to cope with stigmatizing experiences. Subgroup analyses further revealed that people with mild mental illnesses experienced more severe and frequent self-stigma (d = 1.07-2.80) than those with severe mental illnesses (d = 0.13-1.02). Geographically, self-stigma increased in Asian regions (d > 0), while trends in other regions were mixed (d > 0 or < 0). Importantly, statistically significant differences (Pa <0.05 in ISMI and its dimensions) across illness severities and continents mental illness located further validated these subgroup findings.

Conclusions: Self-stigma within the studied age group has indeed increased from 2005 to 2023, underscoring an immediate need for intervention. Consequentially, continuous data is essential to monitor its persistence. Moreover, exploring self-stigma's social determinants to provide effective intervention strategies is necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International psychogeriatrics
International psychogeriatrics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: A highly respected, multidisciplinary journal, International Psychogeriatrics publishes high quality original research papers in the field of psychogeriatrics. The journal aims to be the leading peer reviewed journal dealing with all aspects of the mental health of older people throughout the world. Circulated to over 1,000 members of the International Psychogeriatric Association, International Psychogeriatrics also features important editorials, provocative debates, literature reviews, book reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信