Filippo Russo , Michele Morosato , Alice Sacco , Mario Iannaccone , Claudia Colombo , Giuliano Chizzola , Giacomo Giovanni Boccuzzi , Marianna Adamo , Nicolo' Capsoni , Ilaria Emanuela Bossi , Lorenzo Cianfanelli , Marco Solcia , Federica Fumarola , Daniele Savio , Barbara Bellini , Silvia Ajello , Mario Galli , Fabrizio Oliva , Alaide Chieffo , Matteo Montorfano
{"title":"急性肺栓塞导管治疗的临床特征和结果的性别差异。","authors":"Filippo Russo , Michele Morosato , Alice Sacco , Mario Iannaccone , Claudia Colombo , Giuliano Chizzola , Giacomo Giovanni Boccuzzi , Marianna Adamo , Nicolo' Capsoni , Ilaria Emanuela Bossi , Lorenzo Cianfanelli , Marco Solcia , Federica Fumarola , Daniele Savio , Barbara Bellini , Silvia Ajello , Mario Galli , Fabrizio Oliva , Alaide Chieffo , Matteo Montorfano","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) represents a cardiovascular emergency with increasing incidence. Catheter-directed treatments (CDTs) are increasingly used for high-risk or intermediate-high-risk PE patients when surgical embolectomy or systemic thrombolysis (ST) is contraindicated or ineffective. Although prior research suggests poorer outcomes in women with PE, sex-specific differences in CDTs outcomes remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To investigate the influence of sex on clinical characteristics, procedural complications, and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing CDTs for acute PE.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective multicenter study included consecutive high-risk and intermediate-high-risk PE patients treated with CDTs across five Italian Centers. Clinical data, procedural complications and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Bleeding events were classified according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 191 patients (101 women, 53 %; 90 men, 47 %) treated primarily with ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT, 69 %), with no sex-based differences in device allocation. Compared with men, women more frequently experienced cardiac arrest (11 % vs. 3 %, <em>p</em> = 0.04), had fewer absolute contraindications to ST (23 % vs. 42 %, <em>p</em> = 0.004), and lower rates of recent major surgery (9 % vs. 22 %, <em>p</em> = 0.01). Women experienced significantly higher in-hospital mortality (20 % vs. 9 %, OR 2.53, 95 % CI 1.09–6.41, <em>p</em> = 0.037), higher bleeding rates (22 % vs. 10 %, OR 2.53, 95 % CI 1.13–6.13, <em>p</em> = 0.029), and higher 1-year all-cause mortality (29.1 % vs. 12.7 %, aHR 2.37, 95 % CI 1.12–5.04, <em>p</em> = 0.024).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Women undergoing CDTs for PE present with greater clinical severity, experienced more procedural complications, and had worse early and mid-term outcomes, underscoring the need for sex-specific management strategies in patients undergoing CDTs for PE.</div></div><div><h3>Condensed abstract</h3><div>Catheter-Directed Treatments (CDTs) are emerging therapeutic options for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) patients with contraindications or inadequate response to standard therapies. In this multicenter study, we analyzed sex-specific differences in clinical presentation and outcomes of patients with high and intermediate-high risk PE treated with CDTs. Among 191 patients enrolled, 53 % were women. Most patients presented with intermediate-high risk PE and were treated with ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT). Women presented with more severe clinical profiles, had higher procedural complication rates, and experienced significantly greater bleeding and in-hospital mortality compared with men. Female sex was an independent predictor of 1-year all-cause mortality. These findings highlight the importance of sex-specific management strategies for patients undergoing CTDs for acute PE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"438 ","pages":"Article 133550"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex-specific disparities in clinical characteristics and outcomes of catheter-directed treatments for acute pulmonary embolism\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Russo , Michele Morosato , Alice Sacco , Mario Iannaccone , Claudia Colombo , Giuliano Chizzola , Giacomo Giovanni Boccuzzi , Marianna Adamo , Nicolo' Capsoni , Ilaria Emanuela Bossi , Lorenzo Cianfanelli , Marco Solcia , Federica Fumarola , Daniele Savio , Barbara Bellini , Silvia Ajello , Mario Galli , Fabrizio Oliva , Alaide Chieffo , Matteo Montorfano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) represents a cardiovascular emergency with increasing incidence. Catheter-directed treatments (CDTs) are increasingly used for high-risk or intermediate-high-risk PE patients when surgical embolectomy or systemic thrombolysis (ST) is contraindicated or ineffective. Although prior research suggests poorer outcomes in women with PE, sex-specific differences in CDTs outcomes remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To investigate the influence of sex on clinical characteristics, procedural complications, and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing CDTs for acute PE.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective multicenter study included consecutive high-risk and intermediate-high-risk PE patients treated with CDTs across five Italian Centers. Clinical data, procedural complications and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Bleeding events were classified according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 191 patients (101 women, 53 %; 90 men, 47 %) treated primarily with ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT, 69 %), with no sex-based differences in device allocation. Compared with men, women more frequently experienced cardiac arrest (11 % vs. 3 %, <em>p</em> = 0.04), had fewer absolute contraindications to ST (23 % vs. 42 %, <em>p</em> = 0.004), and lower rates of recent major surgery (9 % vs. 22 %, <em>p</em> = 0.01). Women experienced significantly higher in-hospital mortality (20 % vs. 9 %, OR 2.53, 95 % CI 1.09–6.41, <em>p</em> = 0.037), higher bleeding rates (22 % vs. 10 %, OR 2.53, 95 % CI 1.13–6.13, <em>p</em> = 0.029), and higher 1-year all-cause mortality (29.1 % vs. 12.7 %, aHR 2.37, 95 % CI 1.12–5.04, <em>p</em> = 0.024).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Women undergoing CDTs for PE present with greater clinical severity, experienced more procedural complications, and had worse early and mid-term outcomes, underscoring the need for sex-specific management strategies in patients undergoing CDTs for PE.</div></div><div><h3>Condensed abstract</h3><div>Catheter-Directed Treatments (CDTs) are emerging therapeutic options for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) patients with contraindications or inadequate response to standard therapies. In this multicenter study, we analyzed sex-specific differences in clinical presentation and outcomes of patients with high and intermediate-high risk PE treated with CDTs. Among 191 patients enrolled, 53 % were women. Most patients presented with intermediate-high risk PE and were treated with ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT). Women presented with more severe clinical profiles, had higher procedural complication rates, and experienced significantly greater bleeding and in-hospital mortality compared with men. Female sex was an independent predictor of 1-year all-cause mortality. These findings highlight the importance of sex-specific management strategies for patients undergoing CTDs for acute PE.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":\"438 \",\"pages\":\"Article 133550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527325005935\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527325005935","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sex-specific disparities in clinical characteristics and outcomes of catheter-directed treatments for acute pulmonary embolism
Background
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) represents a cardiovascular emergency with increasing incidence. Catheter-directed treatments (CDTs) are increasingly used for high-risk or intermediate-high-risk PE patients when surgical embolectomy or systemic thrombolysis (ST) is contraindicated or ineffective. Although prior research suggests poorer outcomes in women with PE, sex-specific differences in CDTs outcomes remain unclear.
Aims
To investigate the influence of sex on clinical characteristics, procedural complications, and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing CDTs for acute PE.
Methods
This retrospective multicenter study included consecutive high-risk and intermediate-high-risk PE patients treated with CDTs across five Italian Centers. Clinical data, procedural complications and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Bleeding events were classified according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria.
Results
We included 191 patients (101 women, 53 %; 90 men, 47 %) treated primarily with ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT, 69 %), with no sex-based differences in device allocation. Compared with men, women more frequently experienced cardiac arrest (11 % vs. 3 %, p = 0.04), had fewer absolute contraindications to ST (23 % vs. 42 %, p = 0.004), and lower rates of recent major surgery (9 % vs. 22 %, p = 0.01). Women experienced significantly higher in-hospital mortality (20 % vs. 9 %, OR 2.53, 95 % CI 1.09–6.41, p = 0.037), higher bleeding rates (22 % vs. 10 %, OR 2.53, 95 % CI 1.13–6.13, p = 0.029), and higher 1-year all-cause mortality (29.1 % vs. 12.7 %, aHR 2.37, 95 % CI 1.12–5.04, p = 0.024).
Conclusions
Women undergoing CDTs for PE present with greater clinical severity, experienced more procedural complications, and had worse early and mid-term outcomes, underscoring the need for sex-specific management strategies in patients undergoing CDTs for PE.
Condensed abstract
Catheter-Directed Treatments (CDTs) are emerging therapeutic options for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) patients with contraindications or inadequate response to standard therapies. In this multicenter study, we analyzed sex-specific differences in clinical presentation and outcomes of patients with high and intermediate-high risk PE treated with CDTs. Among 191 patients enrolled, 53 % were women. Most patients presented with intermediate-high risk PE and were treated with ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT). Women presented with more severe clinical profiles, had higher procedural complication rates, and experienced significantly greater bleeding and in-hospital mortality compared with men. Female sex was an independent predictor of 1-year all-cause mortality. These findings highlight the importance of sex-specific management strategies for patients undergoing CTDs for acute PE.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers.
In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.